Documents

Oral argument — Paul Melcher v. City of San Luis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2009

In making that decision, the Court in air failed to understand that evidence of proximity in time alone is sufficient to establish causation. And in the case of Ms. … Salcido, we have a period of 11 months. And in the case of Ms. Torres, it's a period of three years.

Oral argument — Miglio v. Boyle and Bolin Law Firm

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 19, 2014

Again, in a legal malpractice case, the repose period, not the statute of limitations, but the repose period begins to run with the last act of representation on which the malpractice is founded. … We think it's a clean record on the allegations of the complaint. They had no choice.

Oral argument — Bertuglia v. The City of New Y

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 30, 2016

But they were paying for cleaning services. That's, at the end of the day, the critical point. If there is a problem here, the problem is a breach of contract. … He said the court further feels the need to comment on the prosecutor's misconduct in their presentation to the grand jury. The presentation does not rise to the level, but it is very close.

Oral argument — Syed Hasan v. Eastern Washington State Unive

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2012

Well, what the complaint alleges are discrete discriminatory acts during the statute of limitations periods rather than a succession of acts amounting to a single wrong. … In addition to in the interrogatories and in the statement of material facts, paragraph 193 to 195, which is at ER 1525 to 26, they concede Provost Mason was acting in good faith with a clean slate.

Oral argument — Save Our Sound OBX, Inc. v. NC Dept of Transportation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2018

I believe some during roughly the same period where the settlement discussions were going on, but I don't want to be more specific and misstate the record, Your Honor. … So the least environmentally damaging practical alternative that is an application that is made by the Corps of Engineers in determining permits under the Clean Water Act, that decision was never made

Oral argument — Federal Express Corporation v. COMM

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2021

same acts the basis of strict liability under subsection B. … And Iran Air told us that imposing strict liability on people who act without knowledge is not uncommon.

Oral argument — Michael Brousil v. LABR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2021

He can't get up to use the clean energy, the plug-in. He can't see what he's doing. You're not supposed to operate one of these immense things without being able to see what you're doing. … So his protected activity then, your argument is, was his act of reporting both of these problems.

Oral argument — United States v. Roy Helper

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2021

Again, the government promised to recommend a sentence of five years at the sentencing period. … And also, I was assuming you were criminal justice act appointed, but apparently not.

Oral argument — Public Employees for Enviro

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2019

So, 20 years ago, Congress passed a law, the National Parks Air Tour Management Act, that was intended to either mitigate or avoid the adverse impacts of air tours on national park cultural and natural … There are two parks in the entire country out of the 25 that are now subject to the Act that have voluntary agreements. There are none that have air tour management plans.

Oral argument — Hadley v. Subscriber Doe

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2015

Well, yes, that was how the commentator signed his comment, but we never linked Subscriber Doe and Fuboy. … Versus you sue some entity that doesn't exist and never sued an actual entity within the statutory period or prior to the dismissal of that initial claim.

Oral argument — Ransom v. HBE Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2003

The wrong stems from the same conduct or stems from the same act, the disturbing of this asbestos. But the wrong isn't the same. … The environmental protection regulations would say, look, we should have clean air. That's true. But there's no affirmative duty to report that.

Oral argument — Bethany Williams v. National Union Fire Ins.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2015

Sitting in the seat for a prolonged period of time. But that's him, that's not external to him. It is external to him. … Why doesn't Air France provide persuasive guidance to us on this? Air France actually provides zero guidance to us on this.

Oral argument — State of Texas v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2021

Um, those air those air in a slightly different context. In all those cases, the plaintiffs were the detainees were bringing the challenge, and they were already in immigration proceedings. Right. … Mr Wilson says, Well, there Congress was trying that in Castle Rock Congress, excuse me, the state legislature was acting against the background of nonenforcement.

Oral argument — Lakin v. Casey's General Store, Inc. 1972

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2018

There's the question of whether or not there was a third videotape, one that would have either shown the area of the spill from a different angle or whether there would have been a longer time period involved … And in its briefs, it fails to cite to a single page of transcript or an exhibit to identify what act or omission by the plaintiff was negligent.

Oral argument — United States v. Manraksa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2003

of 2001, within that six-month period of time. … Teller talks about equity, the question is, are you allowed to present to the jury that you're clean as the driven snow? In fact, you are not.

Oral argument — Claypool Drainage & Levee District v. Hart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2012

Duck Pond Road was acting more or less as a dam, preventing the further southward movement of the stormwater. … Judge Peterson also made the comment in ruling on this motion.

Oral argument — United States v. US Stem Cell Clinic, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2021

is a totally separate section of the regulation, and that is section 1271.10 sub A, in which it is stated that certain HCTPs will be regulated, but only under section 361 of the Public Health Service Act … But assuming that it really was just some kind of basic cleaning and trimming, it would remain.

Oral argument — David Ermold v. Kim Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2025

Judge Radler, your comment about the clearly established, in this particular case, a burger fell came down the last Friday of June 2015. … And it was a very short period of time.

Oral argument — 26-1445_In Re Ligado Networks

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2026

What we negotiated for in the mediated agreement was for their support during the comment period. … We certainly could ask the FCC, but it is not our comment period. It's the FCC's comment period. And I don't even know—we certainly wouldn't have had any reason to do that.

Oral argument — United States v. Melvin Knight

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2020

So the fact that he stands and makes any comments is of what I consider to be of much less value. … So if that's a factor, then, and Judge Leon may or may not have it right, why wouldn't we remand to him to give him a chance to clean this up?