Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 24, 2017

And why is his exasperation, frustration, and the comments that you just mentioned, why is that? … Again, I submit that the court needs to look at this overall, the period of time, the increase in aggressive conduct toward Mr.

Oral argument — Nguyen v. Runnels

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2005

I misstated my brilliant comment. … No reasonable jury, I believe, and certainly a court, a reasonable court, could not infer that a jury would believe that this comment would suggest that Sohn was in danger and acted because of that.

Oral argument — United States v. Damaso Rivera Fonseca

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2017

at one point that it was a short time or a brief period of time there's a comment where someone says it was a few minutes and then in its brief at the motion to suppress level the government stated two … think we first have to analyze the girlfriend or the Sally port statement and then analyze the second statement which occurred I prior violation of Miranda occurring finally I'll say I think the any air

Oral argument — Dhaliwal v. Salix Pharmaceutic

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2019

Well, she, you know, there were, there was really three distinct acts of retaliation, Your Honor. There was a failure to promote. … Wasn't she out sick during this period? No, no. This was prior to her taking FMLA leave, that there was a promotion promise she didn't get.

Oral argument — Donata Hardy v. City of Los Angeles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2013

The court acted entirely appropriately in excluding that evidence, and there was no abuse of discretion. … And I guess I would appreciate your comment on whether that had any effect on the verdict, in your view, or whether it was harmless.

Oral argument — Tony Lavan v. City of Los Angeles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2012

First, not all the signs said that the street cleaning or the sidewalk cleaning would occur on the same day as in fact for the plaintiffs involved in the incident outside what's commonly referred to as … This Court is not riding on a clean slate.

Oral argument — Federal Republic of Germany v. Philipp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2020

But getting back to the issue of timing, in the Clarification Act of 2016, Congress defined the covered period as beginning in 1933. … Could you address the question that I asked earlier about the definition of a covered period in the 2016 Clarification Act?

Oral argument — Schofield v. Metropolitan Life

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2008

determined, you know, what is the clean record and what is the record we're going to go from? … Smith to go ahead and comment further on some other types of positions. I don't know what the reason was for asking for that comment. But it doesn't take away from the question. But it's not a Q&A.

Oral argument — Patricia Lacourse v. Defense Support Services LC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2020

They are Air Force Instruction 21-101 and Air Force Technical Order 1-1-300. … You have scores of cases that construe the act this way, but it seems to me like the act has just been rewritten to say that when the death occurs on the high seas, the act applies, rather than when the

Oral argument — Del Rio v. CrowdStrike

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 30, 2026

This is a case regarding the preemptive scope of the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978. The statutory text that's relevant to the issue of this case is short. The statute preempts state law claims. … Over a period of time, would that be a situation where?

Oral argument — People v. Harris

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2020

We're not challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, but that's a separate question than whether the evidence is closely balanced for plain air purposes as we're arguing here. Yeah. … And then this cryptic comment, she knows him for 10 years, she knows what he's capable of, does suggest these other bad acts that weren't proven. Okay. Fair enough. Yes.

Oral argument — Takeda Pharmaceutical Company v. Sun Pharma Global FZE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2017

However, the question is whether or not they must be chemically distinct, which is an additional requirement placed on top of the very clean language that is before the court today. … What they're trying to do is get a complete coating because you may get some air, not bubbles, but you may get some surface tension that creates an incomplete coating.

Oral argument — John Kitchin v. Bridgeton Landfill

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2021

They removed the case to the Eastern District of Missouri United States District Court on multiple grounds, including the Class Action Fairness Act, also called CAFA. … They do, at different periods of time. This waste was dumped, Your Honor, in 1973.

Oral argument — Kristine Williams v. MO Department of Corrections

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2026

Our allegations in this case are simply limited to the fact that five successive periods, five successive 30-minute periods passed while Mr. May was in his cell where zero checks were performed. … So what is the specific acts that you think, under the allegations of the complaint, are alleged to be ministerial? No discretion? One check had to be performed in a 30-minute period.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Backlund

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2011

The thrust of the argument is that their authority to make this a crime comes from the Organic Act. The Organic Act says in order to prevent fires and depredations in the forest, you can make rules. … They cleaned up the site. It was only after they finished cleaning it up that the Forest Service suddenly invented this crime to charge them with. Now, so that's the first argument.

Oral argument — ABF Freight System v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2015

Rittenberg, you pick that one right out of the air. I believe... I'll get a dictionary and find out if it says occupation. I believe it does. … pay period.

Oral argument — Illinois Crane, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2017

I'll pick up where your comments were questioning him regarding maintenance. The first time maintenance was ever mentioned was in this brief. I tried the case. I was present before trial. … Outlined in the act. Outlined in the act, yes, sir. The only evidence of a job search, if you will, was when he presented to us with a slip asking to be put back to work. He came to us. He agreed.

Oral argument — Greg Adkisson v. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2022

They cleaned up a downed power line. And here they cleaned up a huge unprecedented coal ash spill. I thought the point was they're the lead agency. They're not the lead entity. … The court instructed the jury that, uh, I have ruled that defendant would be acting contrary to the will of the government and is not immune from suit.

Oral argument — Tweed New Haven Airport Author

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2018

It's not safe, period. Therefore, you don't have commercial aviation there. … How does that have to do with air safety?

Oral argument — Jose Nazario, Jr. v. City of Riverside

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2013

Lysak flew his hot air balloon for the National Guard, and that was a covered period of time. … Essentially he decided to go fly his hot air balloon on his own, and the court said, well no, you're not covered, because that's not a covered period of time under USARA.