Documents

Oral argument — Tweed New Haven Airport Author

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2018

It's not safe, period. Therefore, you don't have commercial aviation there. … How does that have to do with air safety?

Oral argument — Zbitnoff v. James

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 28, 2017

The act 250, The vermont Supreme court Has decided not Just that the Act is preempted But doesn't Apply to this Case. … It was a Decision the Act didn't Apply. And that's Consistent with What the Air force Said in The eis About act 250. I see my Time is up. So unless The court has Any other Questions. Thank you, Mr.

Oral argument — Reed v. Army

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2008

My most important comment, and I'm very interested in it, and I hope the government counsel will address this, is this. … Well, we're talking about a seven-month period where there was no back pay, just the period of the indefinite suspension. How much money is involved? Seven months of pay, Your Honor.

Oral argument — National Hot Rod Association v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2021

We start with the fact that there was basically a 17-day window period. The ballots went out or mailed out on November the 15th. … There are just a few points I'd like to clean up based on Mr. Roberts' argument that I think could bear correcting.

Oral argument — Jacqueline Pilot v. Sean Duffy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2025

She began serving in the air traffic manager position in an acting capacity in 2018, and she served in that capacity until 2020, always receiving an exceeds performance rating. … His first opportunity would have been not to have appointed her as acting ATM.

Oral argument — Air Evac EMS, Inc. v. Ted Cheatham

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2018

Respectfully, that's not what the Reauthorization Act did. Nothing in that act speaks to the particular authorization for air taxis and air ambulances. … act.

Oral argument — United States v. Charles Soderman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2011

So that reluctance is continuing throughout this entire period, and that's why all of that inducing conduct is necessary throughout that entire period before Charles gets to the point where he actually … He made comments, and we can talk about the comments he made that suggested there may have been sexual acts at some point, but he didn't make any comments, didn't express any fantasies, had never expressed

Oral argument — People v. Robinson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2015

He told an ASA in that stipulation that he had a screwdriver in his pocket because he was cleaning up the grill from the previous time he was working, and he still had the screwdriver. … His trial court stated it didn't believe that he was simply acting as a good Samaritan and didn't provide common sense.

Oral argument — Melody Kemsley v. Megan Brennan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2020

But we don't want you to exploit it by relying upon something that was not protected under the act. … And it was air for the district court to assume that those complaints had nothing to do with title seven protected characteristics. So I'm real clear.

Oral argument — Ward v. Air Force

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2010

Secondly, we contend that the administrative judge acted arbitrarily and capriciously or not in accordance with the law by ignoring the evidence of a causal connection between Mr. … And I don't think that's what the Air Force proved. I think the Air Force proved only that he could have accessed these sites, not that he actually did.

Oral argument — Woody v. Willaredt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 1, 2015

And you should probably wash your hands and be clean and dispose of its waste properly. … Period. Oh, I agree. Okay. Go ahead. Application of the Illinois Religious Freedom and Restoration Act allows this court to affirm the hearing officer's finding that Mr.

Oral argument — In re H.L.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2015

more cases like this I'm deep are you ask you're asking us not to amend the rule are you asking it to amend it via case law in a sense and indicate that it's not preferable we want it filed during that period … their room and says you should go clean your room that kid knows they better get their butt up to the room and clean it that's what this court did and surely without using the word must but if we disagree

Oral argument — United States v. City of New York

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2023

I don't know why that's even up in the air. I mean, when you call a class, there must be all kinds of paperwork on that issue. There was evidence about how many candidates were called. … There are different wait periods here. But I take Your Honor's point that it may be a net positive or it may be a net negative.

Oral argument — Cadillac of Naperville, Inc. v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2023

I had a situation once where a guy was cleaning his rifle at his workstation. We didn't necessarily have a clean your rifle at work and pointed at your coworkers. … Here the agency acted very reasonably. I think this court would agree given the fact that this is a very unique set of circumstances.

Oral argument — United States v. Vibgyor Optical Systems Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2019

Verma's trial and Judge Bucklow did comment that she had never seen, as of yet, so many exhibits in a trial. Counsel, can I focus you a little bit here? Sure. … that profit was made so that the number fell somewhat, significantly, but this business about taking 20 percent off of that just was pulled out of thin air.

Oral argument — Minard Run Oil Companyv.United States Forest Service

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2011

No, no, no. 70% of the projects in the five-year period. Oh, 70% of all the projects in a five-year period. Yes, Your Honor. … Water Act, under the Pennsylvania Clean Streams Law, and the issues regarding erosion, which are several years old, are matters of individual enforcement of that separate state regulatory system.

Oral argument — People v. Ashby

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2010

Those are just comments. I understand what you're saying, Judge Weston. … the Illinois Sexually Dangerous Persons Act.

Oral argument — Jordan v. Air Products & Chemicals

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2005

Jordan had clocked in and then Air Products had said, Mr. … Bentubo, 160F2B-36, and this is a 1947 case, to avoid the issue of the damages running for a long period of time, what did they do?

Oral argument — Greg Adkisson v. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2022

They cleaned up a downed power line. And here they cleaned up a huge unprecedented coal ash spill. I thought the point was they're the lead agency. They're not the lead entity. … The court instructed the jury that, uh, I have ruled that defendant would be acting contrary to the will of the government and is not immune from suit.

Oral argument — Roach v. Garcia, Warden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2004

Roach does start talking very freely about the fact that he used to be clean for four years, and he had painkillers after surgery. … Regarding the get-it-off-his-chest comment that the trial court made, I believe that that comment really went to the overall nature of Mr. Roach's attitude regarding this matter.