Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.38s

  • Oral argument — Fredric Eshelman v. Puma Biotechnology, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2021

    Auerbach had received compensation in a three-year period that was valued at $52 million that is in the stipulation. … It's not just looking on the internet, period. And a particular knowledge that they would be...

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Jesus Buzo-Zepeda

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2010

    And there we have comment 2, which we've already talked about. … So if I take comment 2, and I add that to 4A1.2K1, I'm left with, on the first, he was given a period of imprisonment, and whether he served at all or not, if he served any one day, I have to give it on

    14 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. WARD

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2006

    The Court THE COURT He assumed it was the government was acting in good faith. MR. SCHAFFLER That's right. THE COURT Okay. MR. … He's not a clean, perfect person. I understand that.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — ARKEMA v. HONEYWELL

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2012

    Because it's an act of indirect infringement. Ah, but don't you have to show a direct infringement before you can find an act of indirect infringement? … The only actions that actually were alleged are samples in 2009, period.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Bennie Overton

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2014

    picture because because if I don't introduce the evidence the jury will infer that my client was lying not that to corroborate his his testimony his response and that's where I say the court gave some good comments … argument because if it wasn't presented to the district court it's not right to reverse the district court unless plain-air shown we don't know that the the defense counsel wouldn't have attempted to

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Recreational Developments v. City of Phoenix

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2003

    Constitution guarantees the right to offer a live sex act for entertainment. … And so no matter what Gould and Scherzer say, they're still stuck with the fact that they don't have a right of privacy that protects the operation of a live sex act business offering live sex acts as

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ancala Holdings v. Price

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2006

    In other words, if I go into the country club today with guests and I sit down in the restaurant and I get really bad service and I see a cockroach running along the baseboard and I comment to my companions … I come back, the service is good, the restaurant is clean, the food's terrific. But the record doesn't support that. Well, it supports that in 1994 we had this complaint.

    24 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ayo v. Quintero

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 28, 2024

    But just still commenting on the procedure, following that order, it was something of a catch-22, right? … Bessie's acts of hunting, in other words, they were able to allege Mr. Hunt or Mr.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Luxton v. Washington State Department of Veterans Affairs

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2026

    David Luxton, who's also a major in the Air Guard and the Civil Air Patrol. … Well, you act as if the July version might not be the, I mean, isn't that what we looked at? Well, we're talking about reasonable accommodations too, your honor. Okay.

    53 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Donovan

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2024

    And so I think that comment is fairly a reference to the parameters that the court set. … The Court said that with respect to the gun cleaning kit only.

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Salomon v. Kroenke Sports & Entmt

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2021

    Before that date, on April 16, 2013, the significance of that date is it was the day after the exclusivity period expired. … So obviously the fact itself is evidence that there was, um, a precludence of the country and, and, and a, uh, an act of, of the intentionally left him off that stage.

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Heidi Eastus v. ISS Facility Services, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2020

    Act. … I mentioned a couple of minutes or a few seconds ago about the Railway Labor Act. That act was in place at the time of the enactment of the Federal Arbitration Act.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Daretha Braziel v. Gretchen Whitmer

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2024

    If he said that and didn't act with deliberate indifference, I wouldn't say that would be a constitutional violation. It would just be negligence. It would just be negligence, Your Honor. … You can't just say we repeatedly lied to the public for a period of three years. When did we lie? Who did we lie to?

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — National Family Farm Coalition v. USEPA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 29, 2018

    I'll be addressing EPA's violations of the Endangered Species Act, Section 7A2. I'd like to try and touch on three points. … The states have come forward as well, Your Honor, with lots of other reasons for the incidents, including failure to clean the tanks, misuse of the instructions, et cetera, et cetera.

    51 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Shannon Saevik v. Swedish Medical Center

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2022

    Some of those, those comments, and then also the comment that she'd been habitually problematic and a drain on resources. … I mean, those, the comments are what they are. Right.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Joel Stevens v. Administrator FAA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2020

    Air Surgeon was it's revoked. … And now, because he did that, we don't really have the Administrative Procedure Act right to, or these other acts, to a hearing with a judge. Why did he not respond to the October 10th letter?

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — McGhee v. Annucci

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2024

    The people first, the first error is that the people suppressed for a period of years the existence of a second eyewitness, as well as a statement taken from that eyewitness. … Tewitt testified about how her husband and petitioner discussed a gun that her husband was cleaning at that time, and petitioner described how the husband needed to clean the gun in order to avoid leaving

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re Marriage of Clark

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2019

    have to show that she was under legal disability No pleadings even said Duress There was no specific allegations as to Duress or fraudulent concealment And that's the only way To get beyond the 2 year period … Thank you very much So Closing comments? Yes Okay Equitable?

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — JACOBS VEHICLE v. PACIFIC DIESEL

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2013

    Do we need at least a sentence that says, no secondary considerations because no nexus, period? No. … If the fourth and bottom doesn't work because the cam doesn't lift or it doesn't act without, Seiko specifically says, you can use the J brake. Now, Halfbrake argues it teaches away. We disagree.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Gatubhai Mistry v. Qualcomm, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2021

    But having addressed those subjects, you know, having broached the subject, they were under a duty to come clean. This court has said so in many, many cases. … Counsel said, nothing in the complaint shows that we didn't act in good faith, especially on February 26th.

    33 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.