Documents

Oral argument — North MS Med Ctr v. Quartiz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2024

Now, he tried to clean that up when his lawyer asked him some questions about it, but that's what the facts are, right? The facts are, they've said to the court, we can't remove it. … Um, and for that reason, both their, uh, Defend Trade Secrets Act claims, um, and any reliance on, and their Mississippi Trade Secrets Act claims should fail.

Oral argument — Toll Brothers, Inc. v. Chang Lin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2010

The judge does make comments about that the judge feels that in some way that-is it Mr. Toll? Is that how we say it, or Toll? Toll Brothers. Toll. … So at some point, it's true there was an indefinite period of time for removal of the easement, but it was, in fact, temporary.

Oral argument — Andrew Davis v. Wayne Carpenter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 29, 2015

Well, just very briefly on that, there's no doubt that they labored under that assumption for some period of time, and the one or two people that Mr. … This is just as clean a case, as clean a record of this as I've seen. On the prejudice side, yes. On the performance, not so much.

Oral argument — Daretha Braziel v. Gretchen Whitmer

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2024

If he said that and didn't act with deliberate indifference, I wouldn't say that would be a constitutional violation. It would just be negligence. It would just be negligence, Your Honor. … You can't just say we repeatedly lied to the public for a period of three years. When did we lie? Who did we lie to?

Oral argument — Chester Bross Construction Company v. Illinois Department of Transportation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2014

There was a pay stub or a pay record for a single pay period where these individuals who I think in the other time periods were paid as heavy equipment operators, that this came up and this was for purposes … Yes, just briefly a comment on some of the arguments Council made.

Oral argument — Yaqob Thomas v. Joseph Meko

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2016

Because, I mean, that, it wasn't, his federal limitations period isn't told as to that because it wasn't properly filed. … But it's not like that, and I don't think that would be a good rule to require state courts to follow the cookie-cut or clean method because life is seldom that clean.

Oral argument — State of Texas v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2022

Circuit found that there were substantive violations by the EPA about the emissions limits that it had imposed on a number of states under the Clean Air Act. … Congress has rejected the DREAM Act in every Congress since that's been proposed.

Oral argument — MacLean v. Homeland Security

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2008

But when it's sensitive security information governed by regulation, the Whistleblower Protection Act says he has the right to disclose that. … The statute says TSA determines whether this was SSI, period. After TSA determines that, court of appeals reviews it.

Oral argument — People v. Gipson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2024

Okay, so we need to look at that from a plain air point of view. Is that your position? Yes, Your Honor. … Either plain air or ineffective assistance of counsel would allow for review of this error as well. Okay.

Oral argument — In re Guardianship of Burdge

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 21, 2018

being financially exploited, she was being controlled by Toya, Butch stepped back and watched and did nothing, that Toya, not Butch, was making actually the health care decisions for Lillian for that period … I think it's a cleaning business. Right? I'm not sure what it is that he cleans. The point is that Toy was not employed. I don't know why he's paying her $50,000 a month from his own business.

Oral argument — United States v. Ross

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2004

The question, though, is it possible to form a reasonable suspicion based on the acts we've had? And I think we clearly have that here. … When the plates come back clean? Everything's clean. I guess I'm stunned by that, that the United States would go there. You're drawing lightning bolts. Well, all right. And plus the broken window.

Oral argument — Recreational Developments v. City of Phoenix

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2003

Constitution guarantees the right to offer a live sex act for entertainment. … And so no matter what Gould and Scherzer say, they're still stuck with the fact that they don't have a right of privacy that protects the operation of a live sex act business offering live sex acts as

Oral argument — United States v. Cherie Dillon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2018

And, I mean, it's as simple of a matter of that contract dentist, when she's assisting in drilling and filling, as they say, this patient needs to have his or her teeth cleaned. … And then they are absolutely dentists, and they are acting to help Dr. Fricke, sometimes every other Friday, sometimes every third Friday. For some of them, for a period of time, it was every Friday.

Oral argument — The Estate of Adriano Roman Jr v. City of Newark

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2018

You can't direct this to, you know, stuff in the air. We've got to have something in the complaint. … Number one, we would want to amend it, and we think it should be amended to clean it up. I know you want to.

Oral argument — City of Mascoutah v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2024

It is respondent's witness's testimony that before they got to addressing cleaning of the pool, they addressed the pool rules, including the rule against backdives. … So the commission found that the act of getting in a pool during a work break to cool off and have fun with coworkers is an act of personal comfort.

Oral argument — People v. Hurt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 17, 2017

So the note says that juror 88 overheard juror 278 comment that, and I quote, she was afraid of the defendant because he was staring at her, period. … It could mean the air conditioning situation, the situation in the jury box. What if somebody made some statement to you?

Oral argument — Northrop GrummanCorpv.AxisReinsuranceCo.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2020

That doesn't mean necessarily that the wrongful acts complained of in the Marshall class period are somehow not related to the wrongful acts in Graybeck. … With my colleague's indulgence, I have a couple of things to clean up. One of them is, so let's talk about how the tower works.

Oral argument — Robert Krutko v. Franklin County Ohio

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2014

Well, it's not just the 25 minutes, it's the several days that these deputies didn't allow him to shower or clean up. … You attach a temporal period for the first act, the 25 minutes. Then it says he's transferred to another cell where apparently he gets a change in clothing.

Oral argument — United States v. Donovan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2024

And so I think that comment is fairly a reference to the parameters that the court set. … The Court said that with respect to the gun cleaning kit only.

Oral argument — Public Citizen v. NRC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2008

In the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Congress required the agency to consider the threat of air attacks and the events of September 11th in general in revising its design-basis threat rule. … But that does not explain their failure to require passive protection against air attacks, such as through the construction of a beam hinge, as suggested in the majority of the comments.