Documents

Oral argument — Tanner Roth v. Lloyd Austin, III

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2022

This case, of course, as you know, is essentially about the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which I will refer to as RFRA, as well as a Parallel Free Exercise Clause Challenge. … All of the vaccination requirements that have ever existed in the COVID period have been self-imposed by the Air Force themselves.

Oral argument — United States v. Orlee Lumiguid

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2012

And causing an act to be done. … And she commented how she wouldn't do this if she were at cell and they should be providing more training.

Oral argument — Tourchin v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2008

Farinacci, one omission in the record that concerns me is that torture is not simply the act itself, as has been described here historically, but what it requires is a prolonged period of mental pain or … During that time period, he was represented by counsel.

Oral argument — Whitfield v. McCabe, Weisberg & Conway, P.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2021

I come here now because of necessity and by special appearance with clean hands. I am Brother Lauren B. … Our article of incorporation by Act No. 24 is a self-executing treaty, which I believe is protected by the established by Brother Lauren B.

Oral argument — Mary Matson v. United Parcel Service Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2016

That's what the district court ultimately decided and then allowed the second trial on the remaining acts. … And it's the acts, the eight or ten vicious and outrageous acts, that are the proof that ultimately supported the hostile work environment claim.

Oral argument — SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. v. Arcesium LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2026

Software companies use what's called clean rooms. … Here, there was no clean room with Nautilus.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Carroll

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2015

His offense conduct exploiting children was egregious and long term in terms of child pornography and for a period of 40 years he was engaged in hands-on generational abuse to siblings. … No we chose not to do it just to keep the record clean and quite honestly we didn't know the extent of it before the trial.

Oral argument — United States v. Marlene Kalb

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2014

She asked him directly at one time, and I think this is on one of the videos of one of the recordings, have you cleaned up your act? Have you stopped being the criminal that you are? … But previously had said, I cleaned up my act, I'm not in drugs anymore. And then she said, her testimony was, I thought he was kidding. Well, again, that's a jury question.

Oral argument — National Association v.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 27, 2019

This is a Voting Rights Act case against a public school board. Your clients, the appellants, are non-parties, correct? Correct. … That would go to, you know, before you voted on the Clean Water Act, what did you read before you voted? Who did you speak to? I mean, this starts to be more troubling.

Oral argument — Fox Television Stations, Inc v. Aereokiller, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2016

For purposes of the 76 Act. Why couldn't it be? … There was express comment periods given. This is all put at the start of the 2004 and 2008 reports.

Oral argument — United States v. State of Mississippi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2022

The 16 institutionalizations weren't all during that two-year period. I'm sure they weren't. … Why does the U.S. choose Title II over the Rehabilitation Act?

Oral argument — Bebley v. Air Force

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2019

Air Force 14-12-21 Bebley v. Air Force 14-12-21 Bebley v. Air Force May it please the Court, I am here representing Mr. … By keeping it out of the board record because of the possible prejudicial effect, the Air Force admits that it could be prejudicial. The Air Force provided the whole case file to Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Cherie Dillon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2018

And, I mean, it's as simple of a matter of that contract dentist, when she's assisting in drilling and filling, as they say, this patient needs to have his or her teeth cleaned. … And then they are absolutely dentists, and they are acting to help Dr. Fricke, sometimes every other Friday, sometimes every third Friday. For some of them, for a period of time, it was every Friday.

Oral argument — United States v. Devaughn Dorsey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2009

First, that there was a clean break in the questioning. Second, that the agents left the room. … That comment was made to Detective Kazner. And I would submit that that comment of when are they coming back is a routine question.

Oral argument — Bader v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2024

If he was acting clearly, when he was acting clearly in his role as a civilian and not invoking his rank, his authority, instructing, you know, invoking his power of his military office, then he was not … Counsel, 207C deals with a one-year cooling off period. Is that right? And am I correct in understanding that that issue was not being appealed? It was conceded? That's correct.

Oral argument — Joseph Ebu v. USCIS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2025

I you know I was struck Judge Griffin in the EPA clean water roll case from 2016 I think it was your separate opinion but it speaks to a general principle it's at 817 f3d 261 and you were recognizing the … but that does not mean that section 1427 E does not apply to the district court when a district court can review an application for naturalization and can also look to section 1427 B which addresses periods

Oral argument — 06-50020 / USA v. Khan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2008

That's the Arms Export Control Act that was transferred here under Rule 20 following the Central District plea. … But if we fly on air Egypt when we're taking a trip abroad?

Oral argument — Re: Pro Air Inc, Steinberg v. Wembley LTD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2007

I think that's a logical comment. No, and that's my second point. I think the first point is that the contract language is clear. You can read it. … And what the defendants would ignore throughout their briefing and their argument is that Pro Air, in fact, received $10 million in loans by pledging the Gundle shares over a several-year period, shares

Oral argument — United States v. Meza Garcia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2005

Yes, but I think 640 and the way that the guidelines were promulgated and issued became the force of law during that period of time. Your time's up. We'll hear from the government. Okay. Thank you. … So it's a little bit difficult to put this burden on him, knowing his intellectual makeup and the fact that he had said he'd come clean a number of times and the judge said, yes, I've got these other concerns

Oral argument — State of New York v. National Highway Traffic

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2020

So our argument is that, for purposes of the Improvement Act, the relevant figure is the $5 figure. That is the specific monetary amount under the Act. Period. And the rest of it is not the penalty. … The statute doesn't set forth if there's a rulemaking that follows in which comments or petitions for reconsideration follow, if there's an end date or an end period for the final rule, let alone whether