Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.81s
Oral argument — Jenny Flores v. William Barr
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2019
That comment period has closed. … If you look up the word ---- How about clean? Is clean in there anywhere? Sanitary sounds like it has some relations to cleanliness.
64 min of audioOral argument — Diogenes Jasso Bernal v. William Barr
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2019
how we communicate with each other is by speaking through the air vents. … You made a comment about some of his explanations that he had offered or about hearing noises? Yes, Your Honor.
31 min of audioOral argument — Local 702, International Brot v. NLRB
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2019
Or is it just reasonably it would tend to intimidate or coerce non-strikers, period? In other words, does it have to be linked to the non-striking activity? … Hudson's conduct was sufficiently serious to cost her the protection of the act. Should Ms. Hudson's 39-year tenure with the company, with a very clean record, have any impact on the analysis?
31 min of audioOral argument — Rodell Sanders v. Illinois Union Insurance Co.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 27, 2018
during the policy period. … Each trial the slate is wiped clean. So we've raised that again here.
72 min of audioOral argument — In re Zariyah A.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2017
And her statements, I was stressed out and didn't clean the house are not an assessment that her mental disorder prevented her from cleaning the house. … And commendably, she began to participate in the Intech Family Services and she cleaned it all up, cleaned it up.
57 min of audioOral argument — Wang v. Regatta Condominium Association
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2014
The plaintiff was in the lobby with her husband and others for a period of time, am I right? She was only there momentarily. … That means that if somebody else was tracking the water, presumably she would have cleaned it up.
28 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Ceja-Garcia
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2005
Two, the air fresheners. … And clearly, the act of going inside the car is a search at that point. But that didn't occur until after the 20 minutes.
39 min of audioOral argument — Donell v. Kowell
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2007
the confines of the Securities Act. … But it seems to me you're coming in fairly clean.
38 min of audioOral argument — William Hunt v. County of Orange
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2011
Wasn't he supposed to clean up the reserves? Clean up. … This court faced it as far back as Fazio, in fact, comments in the Fazio decision. If we were to carve an exception for whistleblowing speech, so to speak, think about the ramifications.
33 min of audioOral argument — Ephrem Eyob v. Mitsubishi Caterpillar, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2018
Wee got a much lower score of 16 percent, and there was no comment on his at all. … Poor, it says part qualities, many comments. It says needs better inspection. Tools, many comments, new or better tools needed. Design for manufacturability. Issues don't seem to be fixed.
40 min of audioOral argument — Accettura v. Vacationland, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2019
Again, that's further evidenced in the New Vehicle Buyer Protection Act where the Illinois legislature enacted that act to be a consumer protection statute. … So I just have two very quick comments. The defendant keeps talking about a two-week period during which my clients in the dead phase three won't accept this. That is not accurate.
42 min of audioOral argument — Isis Naguib v. Trimark Hotel Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2018
Folding, cleaning, counting towels. Then when they were trying to set her up to fail during that time. … Well, there are no rooms to clean at that point in time. There's not very much for housekeeping to do.
32 min of audioOral argument — People v. Hasselbring
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 15, 2014
as defined under the Controlled Substance Act. … May I just make one last comment here? Because I think it's real important.
44 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jeremiah
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2008
What about eight times a month for a guy who's not a drug crime and who's been clean on the drug tests that they did administer? … Over what period? I believe it was over the entire period on which he was supervised, so that would be eight months or more. There was one in 2006. I believe so, yes, Your Honor.
21 min of audioOral argument — Milo Segner, Jr. v. Ruthven Oil and Gas L.L.C., et
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2019
Just airing the scheme to the public one time in a lawsuit in Janvey could have caused it to be uncovered. … That's a different time period.
42 min of audioOral argument — Saint Anthony Hospital v. Theresa Eagleson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2022
and the state argues this in its brief, that you envision some huge auditing apparatus where the state micromanages every single claim that's submitted to make sure it got paid within this 30, 90 day period … So they're starting too late on the timeline for measuring a clean claim.
46 min of audioOral argument — First Choice Chiropractic LLC v. Mike DeWine
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2020
Well Florida Bar said you could not use the U.S. mail at all in the 30-day period and here the Ohio law says you can use the U.S. mail during the 30-day period. … with Capobianco as a published decision is also not writing on a clean slate.
29 min of audioOral argument — Garco Construction, Inc. v. Secretary of the Army
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2017
The second factor is if the government's act was a genuine public and general act. … A 911 dispatcher certified on the NCIC will run the contractor names through the NCIC for Wants and Warrants, period.
35 min of audioOral argument — Singh v. Southwest Airlines Co.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2003
At best, she presented evidence that Southwest did occasionally clean up spills in front of their ticket counter, but there was no evidence that Southwest cleaned up spills beyond the 11-foot leased space … It's not failure to act. It is a required act on the part of the party seeking a jury trial. It is an express demand requirement.
38 min of audioOral argument — James v. Smith
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2025
I would argue, no, because if he's not brought to the clinic, it's not The wound care clinic is a sterile environment where they can clean wounds, they can clean, again, bodily orifices. … And yes, deliberate indifference is more than negligence, but it is less than acts or omissions done for the very purpose of causing harm or with knowledge that harm will occur.
61 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.