Documents

Oral argument — Monica Guessous v. Fairview Property Investments

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2015

This excessive surveillance, the act that occurs within the 300-day period doesn't have to be egregious. It doesn't have to be terrible. … I'm going to the 300-day period.

Oral argument — United States v. Colum Moran, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 30, 2022

Moran intended consequences of his actions that were neither natural nor probable, no reasonable juror could find that his objective acts, that is his comments, unequivocally marked his conduct as criminal … And the court said a person who acts intends the result of his act under two quite different circumstances.

Oral argument — United States v. Adrian Peters

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2021

It makes it seem like the court made that remark and then later on and it's in the court's comments tried to fix it by referring to the 3553 comments. That is not how this record reads. … anything out of context context here is pretty straightforward it was sentencing and the judge said that the almost default has to be lifetime supervised release that's the context so the judge makes the air

Oral argument — NJEPA v. NRC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

The same generic environmental impact statement also examined continuation of spent fuel storage in pools during the license renewal period and possible release scenarios, including accidents, and again … It doesn't apply per se, but as I read, I guess it's 442, Comment B of Section 442, where it's normally a criminal event would be a superseding cause.

Oral argument — People v. Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2020

So at that point, do we have to look to whether or not the just to the, the air in the comment, or do we have to look at whether what they said about the hearsay argument is was incorrect in order to, … is doing one enough to find out that it was not, that it was air for them to make that comment, that it was not invited, or then do we have to go on and also consider the truthfulness of whether or not

Oral argument — Healthy Gulf v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2024

period before the agency. … We didn't raise it in the comment period so as a NEPA issue NEPA excuses things that are justifiably omitted but more importantly as we know from public citizen is something that is so obviously you know

Oral argument — Kivalina v. Teck

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2003

Yes, because the borough has been aware of these thousands of violations by the mine for many, many years and has taken absolutely zero enforcement action when they could under the Clean Water Act. … I mean, they, they, any citizen, any governmental authority has the opportunity under the Clean Water Act to bring the citizen enforcement suit that the Kivalina Relocation Planning Committee has.

Oral argument — Parsons Evergreene, LLC v. Secretary of the Air Force

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2020

Extended the period of performance 126 days that accounted for 126 days associated with structural brick discussion. … The government tries to distinguish a contract disputes act or CDA case we cited, U.S. versus General Electric, 727F, second 1567, by arguing that the Air Force, notice they didn't say AFSVA, did not receive

Oral argument — United States v. Alarcon Wiggins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2016

We're on plain air here, and there's an unpublished opinion. It's Larrier. And for plain air, there can't be any dispute among jurists of reason. And Larrier says this. … He says the court's comments, when read in context, do not reflect obvious improper participation. So you're on the plain air idea that you really need to show obvious improper participation.

Oral argument — Friends of Animals v. United States Bureau of Land Management

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2025

And now they're getting ready to act again and you say, but wait, there was a bad winter during that year and a half when we had notice and comment and things have changed and a number of horses have passed … Like, you have a time period in which you're acting on currently available information, but then the removal of the excess could come way later.

Oral argument — Woith v. City of Bloomington Fire Pension Fund

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2014

The language of the statute is caused by an act of duty or the cumulative effects of an act of duty. … If there is evidence of a preexisting condition that is exacerbated by an act, by an injury in an act of duty or cumulative effects of an act of duty, that's pensionable. Okay.

Oral argument — New York State Public Service Commission v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2024

And they asked for supplemental comments on that. And my understanding is that those supplemental comments were just filed... The due date was January 19th of this year. … So, for example, it was noted there was a comment period for the current regulations, and my client has participated in that. I'm talking about the statute. I understand, Your Honor.

Oral argument — The Village of Lisle v. French

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2023

What we have here is a prosecution of a village ordinance, period. It's not a hybrid. It's not, Your Honor, a state statute. … As I started to mention earlier, the trial court judge in his ultimate ruling, I'm compelled to comment on the court's conduct of the ruling.

Oral argument — In re: Deepwater Horizon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2015

It was not acted on within the applicable time period of the six-month rule. … period at all.

Oral argument — United States v. Kemp & Associates

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 27, 2018

Those orders brought the Sherman Act prosecution of a per se unlawful customer allocation agreement in the air location services industry to a complete halt. Could I ask just a factual question? … And this Court clearly held that receiving the payment on a bid-rigged contract within the limitations period is sufficient to be an act in furtherance of a conspiracy that brings a conspiracy within the

Oral argument — Quy Truong v. Garden Square Parking Ass'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2020

She wasn't acting as the individual. I included in my, uh, it's in your reply briefs and appendix of this. Of course, yes, I know the court read everything. … Um, in the court's most recent order, the court directed us to focus on the very narrow issue of whether the district court aired and including the attorneys fees as part of the bond amount.

Oral argument — Irwin Industrial Tool v. Department of Revenue

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2010

And over this two-year period, only 25 nights, so on average about once a month. … And then we would have to check on that periodically.

Oral argument — Restaurant Law Center v. LABR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2024

The Fair Labor Standards Act authorizes employers to take a tip credit for tipped employees. … It really meant dual, like you're cutting meat in the back or you're doing maintenance work on the air conditioning units and things.

Oral argument — Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. FDA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2024

The question, the FDA Modernization Act 2.0. … But was that comment to be taken that you should have follow up, that you should further supplement your application in that regard?

Oral argument — James v. Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2025

I would argue, no, because if he's not brought to the clinic, it's not The wound care clinic is a sterile environment where they can clean wounds, they can clean, again, bodily orifices. … And yes, deliberate indifference is more than negligence, but it is less than acts or omissions done for the very purpose of causing harm or with knowledge that harm will occur.