Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.61s
Oral argument — Earthgrains Baking Companies v. Sycamore Family Bakery
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2025
You get two periods of time. And the court sets that period of time based specifically on that statute. And the statute says the original judgment. … I just think it's a clean way, based on Gildia and the standard that's set forth there, without having to disrupt or, you know, displace the court's findings on bad faith. How clean is it?
31 min of audioOral argument — Absolute Cleaning/ SVMBL v. Workers' Compensation Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2011
He has that right under the Act. The Act gives him that right. And there were no records offered by respondent either. The opposite inference could be easily made as well. … And the other thing is, the counsel made comments about the dissent. I'm just looking at the dissent.
23 min of audioOral argument — La Valley v. Colvin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2017
She was able to do cleaning, laundry, cooking six times a week. … They were good for a short period of time. They did not work for a long period of time. What's a short period?
23 min of audioOral argument — Von Duprin LLC v. Major Holdings, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 30, 2021
So it not only cleaned up the properties, it put them back to good use. … And they can't wash that clean by looking back in, or I'm sorry, can't wash that clean by later saying that we satisfied the BFPP requirement at this later point in time.
61 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Bellhouse
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2026
The deadline was May 15th and the Uncharged Acts of Christina and Maribela weren't noticed until four days after that deadline or 11 days before the time period expired. … And that was the reaching through the window and groping Christina's breasts in exchange for the cleaning supplies.
36 min of audioOral argument — Smalls v. Amazon.com Services
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2022
And paragraphs 24 and 25, he led a demonstration asking for the entire building to be closed down to be cleaned, because he thought the cleaning staff was short-staffed. … And to say that's a stray comment when it's made by a senior vice president who's a general counsel of the company is absurd. It's not a stray comment.
30 min of audioOral argument — Vecinos para el Bienestar de v. FERC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2021
It still causes a potential cumulative ozone levels to exceed 75 parts per billion, which is far greater than the 70 part per billion standard set by the National Ambient Air Quality Standard. … I think also there are some, I do want to point out that the ozone analysis for this project, Texas LNG, wasn't required under the Clean Air Act, under the requirements for the prevention of significant
35 min of audioOral argument — Jeff Bardzik v. County of Orange
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2010
He, in effect, tells this lieutenant, you know, I created a mess, you go clean it up. Well, we don't have that in the record. No, but it was a promotion. It was a promotion. … Anyway, finally, among other the Fazio and DeRuza factors that this court appropriately applied, was that during this time period, Lieutenant Bartzik earned approximately $115,000 a year.
27 min of audioOral argument — Milo Segner, Jr. v. Ruthven Oil and Gas L.L.C., et
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2019
Just airing the scheme to the public one time in a lawsuit in Janvey could have caused it to be uncovered. … That's a different time period.
42 min of audioOral argument — Inhance Technologies v. EPA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2024
So on the impurities issue briefly, one of the things that came up during the comment period in this precise rule, the SNR, was that they had a commenter submit a comment that said, we manufacture fluoropolymers … Enhance fluorinates plastic containers such as lawnmower gas tanks, pesticide storage bins, and household cleaning products.
42 min of audioOral argument — Mid Continent Casualty Company v. Alan Engelke
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2020
Because as the court has already commented, this went to a jury. Are you dropping the cross appeal? No, no. … If that's a problem for your client that you need to get that wiped clean, but it doesn't sound like it is. As long as the jury ruling stays in place, it's not a problem. Yeah.
21 min of audioOral argument — Village of Deerfield v. Commonwealth Edison Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2009
You never commented on who you thought was the best arbiter of that determination. What is your position relative to that issue? The court. … And if now the court finds an issue of primary jurisdiction or whatever and sends it back to the ICC after that two-year period, all those claims and the complaints are gone, period, end of story.
47 min of audioOral argument — Williams v. Boeing
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2021
There was one two-year period where he worked. 78 to 80, and he worked elsewhere. And then specifically at the MAF, was he assigned... … Or are you saying there are no documents, period, that would show the relationship of Boeing to this building? Both, actually.
41 min of audioOral argument — Biogen Idec MA, Inc. v. Japanese Foundation for Cancer
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2015
So there is a very clean line of demarcation. Whether Congress might have done it differently... I'm not seeing that. … Can I just comment very briefly, Your Honor, on this Court's jurisdictional... Yeah, go ahead. Yeah, I think the problem is the basic...
56 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Adrian Peters
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2021
It makes it seem like the court made that remark and then later on and it's in the court's comments tried to fix it by referring to the 3553 comments. That is not how this record reads. … anything out of context context here is pretty straightforward it was sentencing and the judge said that the almost default has to be lifetime supervised release that's the context so the judge makes the air
16 min of audioOral argument — Deere & Company v. AGCO Corp.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2025
Our argument was the system didn't remove by capture because the paddle wheels hit the seed, they accelerated the seed, and then it was traveling through the air for some period of time. … That the first act is to remove the seed from the seed meter and then a separate act is to then capture said seed between the two wheels?
37 min of audioOral argument — Laddy Valentine v. Bryan Collier
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2020
Young testified the cleaning was not sufficient for COVID-19. In May, they took Mr. King's deposition, and he said, we need more cleaning supplies. We never have enough cleaning supplies. … It is wrong as a matter of law to hold that Collier or Herrera acted with criminal recklessness or engaged in cruel and unusual punishment.
70 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Quintin Ferguson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2025
Congress enacted the Anti-Arson Act in 1982, which for present purposes defines arson under 844I. … It's not a criminal act.
23 min of audioOral argument — Darlene Alexander v. Servisair, L.L.C.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2014
if she had not acted properly. … Now, the issue comes up, you know, why did they act as they did? I really can't respond to that. I don't know why they did, in such a short period of time, why they made that decision.
39 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Maher Obagi
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2020
Flores specifically found that the prosecutor's argument was improper, that they acted like the defendant had confessed when the defendant had not confessed. … Saad was listed as one of the clean witnesses, along with Armstrong and Spinella.
58 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.