Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.68s
Oral argument — David Bailey v. Brad Livingston
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2016
We did not bring a Clean Water Act case. You cannot isolate the arsenic and pretend the heat doesn't matter because it is the heat. But Judge Ellison did. No, he didn't. … I'd also like to point out that my colleague on the other side said they did not bring a Clean Water Act case, and I think that's notable because there are remedies under the Safe Water Drinking Act, under
42 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Oct 13, 2010
His word, his law, totally out of thin air. … during the limitations period was illegal under the Act.
57 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2018
Anybody who sleeps, can't afford air conditioning, sleeps with the windows up and the screen on them is endangering the child's welfare. Again, Your Honor, that's not what we're saying. … It would be like a strict law, and shut your windows, and put your toilet seat down, and close your liquor cabinet, and clean up all spills, and make sure that you turn off the TV at night.
43 min of audioOral argument — Transupport, Incorporated v. Commissioner of IRS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2018
It can't just come out of, as Judge Barron said earlier, it just can't come out of thin air. It didn't come out of thin air. That was the marketing number they used. … No, I would hope it's not just picked out of the air. No, it's not picked out of the air. There's a reason why it showed up in the notice of deficiency.
32 min of audioOral argument — Donna Avila v. Remco Hydraulics, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2010
Well, that's why I made the comment about the lawyer, because that's not our burden, about what tipped them. It simply was as the time began. … I mean, in today's Federal court world, that's a very, very long time to get your act together.
50 min of audioOral argument — Monsanto Company v. David
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2007
I had the same question, and maybe you can comment on it. 295 of the appendix... There's a reference at the top of the page to... … I agree we give clear air deference to fact-findings, but unless I'm missing another piece of evidence in the record, this fact-finding is clearly wrong.
36 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Smith
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2024
I don't think that I've heard of probation normally acting as an intermediary with the doctor directly, and in fact, I think that that would be invasive. Ms. … Smith Well, the defendant here had a period of at least five years of sobriety. He's had success on supervision before.
15 min of audioOral argument — Sierra Forest Legacy v. Sherman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2010
The agency comes in and cleans up the brush. … I would submit in my limited time that the Forest Service gave very focused, hard look on those particular comments.
64 min of audioOral argument — ANSTINE v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2011
And so in order to have a claim here, you've got to have a claim that the Air Force acted improperly, which is what caused his resignation. … If the Air Force acted improperly in demoting him to the technical sergeant, and that brought him to the end of the period, and he chose to voluntarily retire, that seems to me still involuntary.
25 min of audioOral argument — Kane v. PaCap Aviation Finance, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2026
and the Warren Act. … We wouldn't have all the Warren Act issues, the Dislocated Workers Act issues, the liability issues. It would be a much more focused trial as to this point. And again, it's...
70 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Thomas Tanke
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2013
Do you want to adopt Judge Fisher's comments or would you like to modify them? Yes, I would adopt Judge Fisher's comments. Are you going to share your fee with him? … And in this case This was actually within the period that was alleged in the indictment.
34 min of audioOral argument — United States v. David Johnson
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2014
The district judge, Judge Phillips, actually commented on Ms. Lipscomb's testimony at trial. Let me read you the direct quote from ER 1904. … was officially rejected by the Air Force.
36 min of audioOral argument — BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2025
So it was fully aired in the Second Circuit. … HLF was a known Hamas financer that would soon get shut down during the relevant period, shut down at the beginning of the relevant period.
52 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Daryl Pawlak
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2019
He didn't run any programs to clean the evidence off of his computer. … So in all the cases that have addressed this, whether the government's acted properly or not, have they addressed the issue of third-party victims?
41 min of audioOral argument — Sierra Club v. FERC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2023
That's not related, that is not part of the Clean Water Act section 404 permit. Yes, but it shows that they are moving forward with the project. … Issues about the Climate Act impacts on gas demand, as Interveners acknowledged, were raised by New York, which in its comments said the Gas Act undercuts gas demand in New York.
48 min of audioOral argument — Carrillo v. Un Pac RR
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2023
That analysis was specifically addressed by Congress in 2008 in the Act of September 25th of 2008 on the first page of the Act. … Carrillo from working for Union Pacific is the restrictions were limited to that five-year period, that critical five-year period where the risk for a future seizure is at its highest, 30 to 35 percent
41 min of audioOral argument — Keenan v. Woodford
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2003
Pierce, that came in, related to a period of time very long after the period of the trial. … It cannot be reversed by this Court in the absence of clear air by the district court, and it's our position that there was no clear air, in fact that the abundant and overwhelming weight of the evidence
34 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Montgomery O'Connor
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2004
Weintraub, if the law says that all that is required is one overt act within the period of the statute of limitations, it doesn't have to be a criminal act in order to save all of the other overt acts, … In fact, they paid the cleaning fee that were associated with those.
56 min of audioOral argument — Choice v. Visionquest Association
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2012
The good news is these kids actually were all toxicology clean and gifted students from a charter program. But you're right. … I know we've aired out quite a few. I'm certainly happy to address anything else.
83 min of audioOral argument — People v. Radford
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2017
During the trial, there was a period where there were a number of journalism students who were in attendance at that time. … It's second-pronged structural plein air, or sorry, structural air, and therefore, second-pronged plain air.
45 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.