Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.72s
Oral argument — United States v. Edwin Carr
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2013
He definitely made some comments about it. Why were his comments insufficient? Because they weren't directly tied to the numbers. … That means that this additional enhancement is, is, is air. I mean, or the distinction between the two is air.
61 min of audioOral argument — People v. Blanco
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 26, 2014
Blanco in his store during a time period that he would have to be cleaning up after a very bloody murder. Well, he didn't say a time. He did not say a time. He just said. … And first of all, it's not even logical to suggest that if he came in hours after the fact, he wouldn't have gone home and cleaned up.
51 min of audioOral argument — United States v. KNOPFLE
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2004
And under the Clean Water Act, it's very clear, and the appropriate regulation is very clear to which agency the defendant must report. … And had the defendant been convicted of under 33 U.S.C. 1319c1, a negligent violation of the Clean Water Act, that might have been sufficient.
34 min of audioOral argument — Pueblo of Jemez v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2022
But you do agree that the court said if I were writing on a clean slate, it wouldn't be this. Right. … I mean, I really think he was airing his angst on that page.
60 min of audioOral argument — Montana Admin v. Goldin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2004
Those mines were not being cleaned up. They were declared bankruptcy in Reno, Nevada, seeking bankruptcy protection. There were ongoing environmental exigencies needed to be cleaned up right away. … No, and actually let me comment on that. How could you not? Wasn't that part an integral part of the liquidation plan?
43 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Ryan Seideman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2012
There was a description, and there are reports that actually relate to that description, and I believe it was a Nike air trainer shoe's tread pattern was what was determined, and that was in the reports … How about the potential, I guess, prosecutorial misconduct here regarding the objection that the defense made to the belt and the comment that the prosecutor made?
51 min of audioOral argument — Carroll Sievers v. LABR
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2009
We're looking at the Board's decision, and we're determining whether the Board is supported by substantial evidence or acted arbitrarily and capriciously otherwise. … Moreover, in this case, there was a specific notice and comment period.
44 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2016
But what we have here is not continuous comments. We have one-time comments, isolated comments that did not rise to the level that anybody complained about. … One of them was for a period of a year that he was commenting about the dating habits of one of the sergeants. And these comments went on and on.
30 min of audioOral argument — Pack v. Maslikiewicz
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2019
I'd like to address my comments, if I may, just initially to some of the colloquy that I heard before the bench. … This is not a real estate agent's comments trying to market the property.
31 min of audioOral argument — Sieben v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2014
What we're talking about, if indeed she's eligible for non-disability retirement, sometime this year we're talking about benefits from the Air Force for this three-year period, subject to whatever offset … I think that period of time is the main issue.
35 min of audioOral argument — David Bailey v. Brad Livingston
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2016
We did not bring a Clean Water Act case. You cannot isolate the arsenic and pretend the heat doesn't matter because it is the heat. But Judge Ellison did. No, he didn't. … I'd also like to point out that my colleague on the other side said they did not bring a Clean Water Act case, and I think that's notable because there are remedies under the Safe Water Drinking Act, under
42 min of audioOral argument — Valbruna Slater Steel Corporat v. Joslyn Manufacturing Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2019
Maurice obviously was a plaintiff bringing a claim in state court and then subsequently in federal court, which I think matches the pattern you laid out under the Sherman Act for their federal claim. … Obviously CERCLA's purpose is to clean up an entire site, not to clean up in one spot.
51 min of audioOral argument — Metropolitan Alliance of Police v. Illinois Labor Relations Board
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 28, 2013
It's a determinate period with specific goals and an end point. … a bathroom, how to keep themselves clean.
47 min of audioOral argument — Fontem US, LLC v. FDA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2023
You know, there are very specific requirements for the type of notice that must be given for the length of comment periods or consultation with the expert advisory committee or delayed effective dates … So for example, it describes information about the temperature and humidity in the clean room as needed.
63 min of audioOral argument — Twentieth Century Fox Internat v. Gemini Film International
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2010
Schlicht's hands may not be entirely clean in this matter does not absolve Mr. Scriba, nor does it impact the jurisdictional analysis as to Mr. Scriba's involvement. … Act like that. I know that's a light comment, but here's the question. If we were to permit some limited discovery, would Fox be able to take Dr.
20 min of audioOral argument — Personnel Staffing Group, LLC v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2016
Because we're going to get into that, because according to the medical evidence, arguments he couldn't stand for any period of time, correct? … What did you say the commission did that was in the air when it interpreted the report that you submitted?
29 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Lisette Lopez
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2022
, which seems to refer back to a period which would make the crime within the correct time period. … Yeah, A1B Act 1. Yeah. I mean, that's... Yeah, that's the problem.
32 min of audioOral argument — California v. Texas
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2020
Could you comment on that a bit and just give us an understanding of what your injury is? Sure, Justice Thomas. … Now, I understood your opening comments to say that the findings in the original act are, in essence, the equivalent of an inseverability clause. I just want to test that for a second.
120 min of audioOral argument — Ciolino v. Simon
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2019
In other words, the defamatory act had to have occurred within one year of your April 2016 filing. Correct? The filing had to be within a year of the defamatory act. Correct. Okay. … I mean, that's just not the way that the courts have addressed defamation statute of limitations periods applicable to defamation claims.
74 min of audioOral argument — Elin Phifer v. Icelandair
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 17, 2011
I'm counsel for Appali Iceland Air in this matter. … It doesn't list a single periodical that says this is the way it should be done. And, and, and that's it.
22 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.