Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.23s
Oral argument — Deere & Company v. AGCO Corp.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2025
Our argument was the system didn't remove by capture because the paddle wheels hit the seed, they accelerated the seed, and then it was traveling through the air for some period of time. … That the first act is to remove the seed from the seed meter and then a separate act is to then capture said seed between the two wheels?
37 min of audioOral argument — Smith v. ME Bureau of Revenue Services
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2018
On the other end of the spectrum is C-4, which is where you have a third file case in a rolling 12-month period. … And then if the middle space was filled in by a provision that was clean with a 30-day cutoff, and therefore looked like the first part of the pole, or clean and looked like the last one, your case would
38 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Grant
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2017
Congress has not acted. … And do we have to pick a number out of play God and pick a number out of a hole out of the air?
71 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Kendrick Frazier
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2024
But I agree that the factual findings are reviewed for clear air. … There was a witness who said that he was hosing off the sidewalk for a period of time, but it's not clear...
45 min of audioOral argument — Atlas Air, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2018
Robert Siegel for Atlas Air. Let me, if I might, Your Honors, go right at this issue. … In the cases, the United cases, for instance, that was a Section 8 Norris LaGuardia Act clean hands case.
53 min of audioOral argument — In re Marriage of Sturm
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2012
I don't think number one I don't think any trial court likes to be reversed by this appellate court, and he commented about that at the opening aspect of his order And you know I don't know what there … She's Cleaning houses, that's what she does she still have some of her insurance accounts. She's given them all away. Yes. They took it away from What council said?
36 min of audioOral argument — People v. Dauber
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2010
He did not act as though he expected privacy in the space. To use the language from People v. … It's implied that he has the right to exclude, and counsel commented there's an implied expectation of privacy in that residence.
25 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Yulian Villavicencio
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2020
Then we have the period, that eight-minute period, between the time where the warning ticket is issued and the point where Rivero signs the consent form, which is 1102 to 1110 a.m. … She made a comment about the proclivity of people who work in the rental car industry being drug traffickers because they know where to keep items in SUVs and the like, particularly people who clean cars
46 min of audioOral argument — Bear Valley Mutual Water Co. v. Kenneth Salazar
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2015
The final rule cites to a couple of studies that were not available during the comment period. … than decline during the open comment period.
53 min of audioOral argument — Kivalina v. Teck Cominco
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2005
That suit alleges 2,200 violations of Tecumeco's Clean Water Act. It's brought by the five individuals who seek to substitute in here. … The borough has comments that they would like to make. If you have no other questions I'll turn it over to the borough. Thank you. There is no appellant in this case.
38 min of audioOral argument — Darlene Alexander v. Servisair, L.L.C.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2014
if she had not acted properly. … Now, the issue comes up, you know, why did they act as they did? I really can't respond to that. I don't know why they did, in such a short period of time, why they made that decision.
39 min of audioOral argument — Friends of the Wild Swan v. EPA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2003
EPA appeals from a judgment making EPA responsible for establishment under the Clean Water Act of total maximum daily loads for impaired water bodies in the state of Montana. … Supreme Court have said the purpose of this act is to clean up the nation's waters.
41 min of audioOral argument — Jeff Bardzik v. County of Orange
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2010
He, in effect, tells this lieutenant, you know, I created a mess, you go clean it up. Well, we don't have that in the record. No, but it was a promotion. It was a promotion. … Anyway, finally, among other the Fazio and DeRuza factors that this court appropriately applied, was that during this time period, Lieutenant Bartzik earned approximately $115,000 a year.
27 min of audioOral argument — Amanda Frlekin v. Apple Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2017
Does the comments of Stevens and Marillion and Inalcatrar apply only to community cases or not? The issue of bag inspection is one that comes up a lot. It does. I noticed. I noticed. … If they drove themselves, maybe they were on the air and subway, maybe they dropped their kids off at school.
32 min of audioOral argument — Astornet Technologies Inc. v. BAE Systems, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2015
There is nothing in the complaint to suggest that the subsidiary was acting as an agent of the parent company. … It's a 1976 decision where, in essence, there were government contractors who were contracted to clean up Andrews Air Force Base. It was a garbage disposal or something.
33 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Charles Schrode
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2016
So even if it were not waiver, we're under plain air standard. And it is hard. … I appreciate the comment you made. I just would suggest in the 28J letter, your conclusion of what Hill opinion struck, it may not be as accurate as occurred. I mean, I respect your advocacy.
24 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Deaon Bailes
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2009
If a janitor comes to clean the facility and carries a pound of heroin in his pocket, can he say, well, I just came here to clean the thing? I didn't intend to commit a crime. … Period. Without ---- whether they intend to sell it or use it later or ---- The Court acknowledged that the purpose is to keep it from going into the grounds.
14 min of audioOral argument — Absolute Cleaning/ SVMBL v. Workers' Compensation Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2011
He has that right under the Act. The Act gives him that right. And there were no records offered by respondent either. The opposite inference could be easily made as well. … And the other thing is, the counsel made comments about the dissent. I'm just looking at the dissent.
23 min of audioOral argument — Marsh v. Sandstone North, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 22, 2020
And so when she describes her comments as a rant, that may be what it was, but that's her expressing what she found the case to be, and I think she expresses that. … When we got there, they had cleaned up the entire property. And what is telling is that they picked up bones.
48 min of audioOral argument — Tyler Brennan v. Stephen Dickson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2021
But in any event, FAA exercised that authority under 49 U.S.C. 44701A5, which provides the agency authority to regulate air commerce or the means necessary to ensure safety in air commerce and national … The commenters were concerned there were not very many of these FAA-recognized identification areas.
46 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.