Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.28s
Oral argument — D & L Landfill, Inc. v. Illinois Pollution Control Board
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2017
They basically have said you're going to monitor groundwater until this stuff is clean enough to drink. That's what they said. That's not the nature of landfills. … of the Act or Part 807 of the regulations.
38 min of audioOral argument — Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A. v. City of Phoenix
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 12, 2024
Presumably Gallagher made some comments on it. … My last comment is Judge Ezra looked at these issues three times, and he issued three detailed decisions.
36 min of audioOral argument — Ramona Rocheleau v. Microsemi Corp.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2017
So how can she blame them for not telling shareholders when they had no obligation to disclose anything to the shareholders at the time period, by the time period in which your client sent the report in … Your Honors, I'd like to just briefly comment on a few of the factual assertions that we just heard.
20 min of audioOral argument — Rushforth v. Berryhill
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 25, 2019
We really have to liberally apply the Social Security Act. Dr. Caputo treated him for many, many years. … I will, let me try to address those comments. There's no evidence that his conditions got worse. The reason the second period was a year and a half or two later is because he didn't reapply.
22 min of audioOral argument — MCDANIELS v. MOBIL OIL
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2007
And I guess the two pertinent ones would be an intent, an intentional act, and a fraudulent concealment. GINSBURG Fraudulent concealment. … Well, there was a comment that we cited in our brief that Judge Hatter made at that status conference.
43 min of audioOral argument — Carolina Perez v. Andrew Saul
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2021
That's not the standard under the Social Security Act. They have to show that their impairments caused disabling symptoms for a period of 12 continuous months. … And she needed to have a clean environment.
30 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Micky Rife
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 22, 2021
effective and the treaty is only valid to the see it seems i guess this is really an interesting case because it's about first principles you know and it's not often we get to to write on a slate that is as clean … in the dialogue between the united states and the united nations about its implementation of the optional protocol okay did and justice scalia included both the expanse and the the restriction in his comment
54 min of audioOral argument — Kim Cramton v. Grabbagreen Franchising LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2023
Well, Your Honor, I guess two comments on that. One, I don't think we need to go there given the admission in the summary judgment response that they were insolvent. … And I don't think we need to wrestle with Article 3 of the Act. And there's no dispute as to what the amount was due. It's $23,017 and change. The district court was right on all three parts.
31 min of audioOral argument — People v. Wilson-Neuelib
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2020
And the judge admitted that and commented, we don't know what a de facto sentence is. … Basically, you're saying any case where there was a sentence before buffer is going to have air.
35 min of audioOral argument — Mauer v. Rubin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2010
It says the period begins on the act or omission out of which the injury arises. … That's the language that you need to clean up, I think, from some of these other cases that talk simply about the last act of representation.
68 min of audioOral argument — Indemnity Insurance Company of v. Unitrans International Corpora
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2022
Was there some agreement between the parties to toll that period? I don't believe so, Your Honor. … Carriage by air is a defined term of art. 18.3 then defines that term. It says carriage by air comprises the period during which the cargo is in the charge of the carrier.
30 min of audioOral argument — Ocean County Landfill Corp v. US EPA Region II
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2011
And we believe that according to EPA's theory, then by virtue of drawing these single source boundaries, they can actually render nugatory the provisions of the Clean Air Act that says only an owner or … EPA does understand that New Jersey was hesitant to act while this litigation was pending.
38 min of audioOral argument — In re: Deepwater Horizon
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2019
They paid him money to clean up the oil as well. … That's under the Oil Protection Act, Oil Pollution Act. Well, is that one of your claims here, is that the releases are not authorized?
36 min of audioOral argument — Airlines for Amer v. Dept of Trans
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2026
on data it never gave the public a chance to comment on. … Congress in the FAA Reauthorization Act codified that rule.
65 min of audioOral argument — Bernard Mulder v. Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2019
He's giving you papers and it's sort of up in the air and he doesn't know what's going on. And then finally, so you give him some kind of unilaterally and I'm not exactly sure what happened. … And then it's not until 2014 that you clean everything up. And I realize that you expect people to make claims, but this is also money that he had earned. I mean, it was his money.
37 min of audioOral argument — Garcia Dorantes v. Warren
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2015
It's all up in the air. … Rothman's report covers the entire period at issue here. It's from April of 2001 until August of 2002. Dr.
33 min of audioOral argument — Autobar Systems of N J v. Berg Company LL C
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2024
So there's no question in our minds, Your Honor, that it is a franchise and that they were improperly terminated under the Franchise Practices Act. … And, you know, listening to Your Honor's comment about mootness before, the question would be, if this is immediate irreparable harm that occurred in April of 2023, and any time after this in 2024, in
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Braxton_Mason_Cannon_Summers
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2021
But Stovall hardly comes into the courtroom with that kind of relatively clean slate. … Just one other follow-up comment.
80 min of audioOral argument — People v. Skinner
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2025
If if you claim it's air, counsel invites this air. Now, I know you've argued you think that there needs to be that affirmative action. … I want to follow up on a comment you made earlier and I want to make sure that I understood it correctly when you were arguing.
35 min of audioOral argument — Gregory Leeb v. Nationwide Credit Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2015
She did not intend to violate the act. This court's decision in court quite clearly says the mere fact that she intended to do something does not make the bona fide air defense unavailable. … She has to intend to violate the to make the bona fide air defense unavailable.
16 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.