Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

0.22s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 7, 2024

    Morss, Clean Air Act Handbook: A Practical Guide to Compliance § 5:38 (33d ed. 2023) .................................................................. 23 Exec. Order 14037, 86 Fed. … Moreover, this Court should grant the petition to review the merits of EPA’s Clean Air Act waiver here, which authorizes California to regulate global greenhouse gas emissions.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of the Air Force, et al., Petitioners v. Prutehi Guahan, fka Prutehi Litekyan

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 27, 2026

    EPA, HOVENSA LLC, Clean Air Act Settlement (Jan. 26, 2011), https:// www.epa.gov/enforcement/hovensa-llc-cleanair-act-settlement .................................................. 27 (xiv) U.S. … EPA, HOVENSA LLC, Clean Air Act Settlement (Jan. 26, 2011), https://www.epa.gov /enforcement/hovensa-llc-clean-air-act-settlement. 27 Despite this record, EPA issued a permit in 2020— seven years after

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — National Review, Inc., Petitioner v. Michael E. Mann

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 12, 2019

    Mann to Phil Jones (Dec. 30, 2004, 09:22:02) .........................................13 Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: EPA … Montford, 31 Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: EPA’s Response to Public Comments, Vol. 2, Response (2-65) at 46. 32 See Patrick

  • Apendix — Mass v. City of Carlsbad

    Supreme Court brief · Apendix · 1995

    Further, the location permitted their home to be cooled by fresh, clean air from the ocean, making air conditioning unnecessary. … EXHIBIT D 62 In conformance with the Brown Act, no action can occur on items presented during Public Comment.

    513 U.S. 1128
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

    NEDA/CAP was formed in 1979, shortly after the enactment of the 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments, to address major policy issues arising under the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), its regulations, and Environmental … (“SO,”) (a precursor to fine particle pollution),” OCE has joined NPCA as a plaintiff in the Clean Air Act citizen suit in Tennessee. Nat'l Parks v. TVA, Case No. 05-6329 (6" Cir.)

    549 U.S. 561
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — PacifiCorp, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 28, 2024

    BACKGROUND The Clean Air Act establishes “a cooperativefederalism approach to regulate air quality.” U.S. Magnesium, LLC v. EPA, 690 F.3d 1157, 1159 (10th Cir. 2012). … The Act directs the EPA to establish and periodically revise National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), which represent “the maximum airborne concentration[s] of [certain air] pollutant[s] that the

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd. v. Pakoototas (No. 06-1188)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

    As another example of the consequences of the Court of Appeals’ decision, under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. … Air Act, a result clearly not envisioned by Congress in enacting either the Clean Air Act or CERCLA.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — CED'S, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1985

    Section 203(a) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U-S.C. … Section 114 and Section 203 of the Clean Air Act First, EPA has asserted in its motion that the court’s interpretation of Section 114 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.

    471 U.S. 1015
  • Appendix — Penn Central Transp. Co. v. New York City

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1978

    The Landmarks Law and the Commission’s acts in purported reliance thereon deprive Penn Central of rent at the rate of $1,000,000 per year in respect of the period commencing on January 22, 1968 and … The Landmarks Law and the Commission’s acts in purported reliance thereon further deprive Penn Central of rent at the rate of at least $3,000,000 per year, in respect of the period after the building

    438 U.S. 104
  • Reply Brief — American Chemistry Council v. Sierra Club

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2010

    The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments charged EPA with issuing MACT rules for all major sources of 189 toxic pollutants under a phased schedule. 42 U.S.C. § 7412(e). … GAO, GAO/RCED-00-72, Status of Implementation and Issues of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, at 11 (Apr. 2000).

    559 U.S. 991
  • Amicus Brief — Chevron USA Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1984

    in Part D of the Clean Air Act) be nationally uniform. … Air Act.

    467 U.S. 837
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

    . § 137011) (1988) (Clean Water Act) - 42 U.S.C. £7416 (1988) (Clean Air Act). … Sec, e.g., 33 U.S.C. § 1870 (Clean Water Act) : 42 U.S.C. $7416 (Clean Air Act).

    505 U.S. 88
  • Reply Brief — Bishop Processing Co. v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1970

    Clean Air Act, 42 U. S. … Whether thirty-one instances of malodor over a consecutive fourteen-week observation period constitutes as a matter of law a violation of the federal Clean Air Act, 42U.8.

    398 U.S. 904
  • Opposition Brief — National Parks Conservation Association v. Tennessee Valley Authority (No. 07-867)

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2008

    Whether petitioners’ pre-suit notice was suffi- ciently specific with respect to petitioners’ claims under the Clean Air Act's New Source Performance Standards. … The Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., was enacted “to protect and enhance the quality of the Nation’s air resources so as to promote the public health and welfare and the productive capacity

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al., Petitioners v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 3, 2026

    Yet neither the Clean Air Act nor the Constitution imposes 3 such a rule. … with stationary sources, than since the 1970 Clean Air Act Amendments”).

  • Petitioners Brief — Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-46)

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2014

    Hassler, Beyond the New Deal: Coal and the Clean Air Act, 89 Yale L.J. 1466 (1979-1980)..........00...... 7 Dennis D. … Hassler, Beyond the New Deal: Coal and the Clean Air Act, 89 Yale L.J. 1466 (1979-1980).

  • Opposition Brief — Union Carbide Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Lee Ann Sommerville

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 6, 2026

    WVDEP maintains an annual emissions inventory pursuant to its responsibilities under Title V of the Clean Air Act. 42 U.S.C. § 7661c(a) (requiring emissions reporting by permit holders); see also Emissions … (cleaned up).

  • Opposition — Dow Chemical Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981

    EPA, 427 U.S. 246 ...... 10 Ill PRECEDING PAGE WAS BLANK IV Statutes and regulations: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. (1970 ed.) 1857c-5 ..... 2 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. L. … of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. (1970 ed.) 1857c-5,!

    452 U.S. 939
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. American Trucking Assns.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

    REQUIRING EPA TO IDENTIFY “INTELLI- GIBLE PRINCIPLES” DERIVED FROM THE CLEAN AIR ACT IS CONSISTENT WITH ESTABLISHED PRECEDENTS ......._................ A. … Rusk, 381 U.S. 1 (1965) . dU Statutes : 5 U.S.C. § 706(2) (A) - ue 16 26 U.S.C. § 501 (c) (3) 1 iti TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued Clean Air Act § 109(b) (1), 42 U.S.C. § 7409(b) (1) Clean Air

    532 U.S. 901
  • Appendix — Raytheon Co. v. Roper Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1984

    The claims were allowed by _ the patent exminer without change or comment. The patent in suit was issued on June 7, 1977. … which exists in the cavity under high temperature self-cleaning conditions, the convection path of the air being sufficiently constricted so that air is convected in the self- cleaning mode at a

    469 U.S. 835

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.