Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.39s
Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — B. F. Goodrich Co. v. Northwest Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1970
Pa, 1967), rev'd on other grounds, 399 FB. 2d 825 ¢3d Cir, 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1023 (1969). > : Most ‘v. … Industries and arguments from Goodrich, the Com- _mission issued an order dated April 24, 1969 (Ap- pendix, infra, p..11), which reopened the proceeding for the purpose of subjecting Industries to Section
400 U.S. 822Statement Opposing Jurisdiction — James Stewart & Co. v. Sadrakula
Supreme Court brief · Statement Opposing Jurisdiction · 1940
Y: 336, 162 U.S. 399 6,7 a ee tohinhoff v. Fischer, 210 N: Y. He. 4 id 8 Brinke rhoff- warts Tr ust, ete, V .. Mill, 281 U. … S. 399, upon the authority of the. oft cited ° ‘case of Chicago, Rock Is land & Pacific RR. Co. v. - McGinn, 114 U.S. 542. As was done in Barrett v.
309 U.S. 94Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lenroy McLean, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 12, 2020
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT (NAME OF COURT THAT LAST RULED ON MERITS OF YOUR CASE) PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Lfi.nr_oy_Mclean-..J^J-5-24 … Pittsburg Paints Inc., 399 Fed. Appx 341, 2010 WL 4069430 at 1(10th cir 2010); Therefore, there is no statue of limitations.for bringing a fraud upon the court claim.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Dignity Health, dba Mercy San Juan Medical Center, Petitioner v. Evan Minton
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 16, 2020
City of Philadelphia, No. 19123 (cert. granted Feb. 24, 2020). … United States, 567 U.S. 387, 399 (2012) (citing U.S. Const., art. VI, cl. 2).
Reply Brief — Gerald Scott, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Sep 29, 2021
BIO at 19 (quoting Burris, 912 F.3d at 399). Yet the “without using physical force” part is what mattered. … Burris, 912 F.3d at 399.
Appendix — Steadman v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1981
Talley Industries, Inc., 42/ 42/ 399 F.2d 396 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1015 (1969). … As the Court of 43/ 399 F.2d at 402. 44/ Sections 17(a) and 17(e) would probably be among those sections.
450 U.S. 91Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Charles Kenneth Foster, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 8, 2018
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 427-31 (1986) (O’Connor, J., concurring) (liberty interest in meaningful state competency proceedings); Ohio Adult Parole Auth. v. … State, 237 So. 3d 907 (Fla. 2018) 24. Lucas v. State, 234 So. 3d 647 (Fla. 2018) 25. Marquard v. State, 234 So. 3d 560 (Fla. Jan. 24, 2018) 26. Sweet v. State, 234 So. 3d 646 (Fla. 2018) 27.
Opposition Brief — Adams ex rel. Ridgell v. Children's Mercy Hospital
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1992
Jeter, 486 U.S. 456 (1988).............22- 0 24 Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976) .......-- +e eee eeee 24 Davis v. Omitowoju, 833 F.2d 1155 (3rd Cir. 1989) .21, 25 Duke Power Co. v. … State Board of Medicine, 555 P.2d 399 (Idaho 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 (1977); Fein v.
506 U.S. 991Motion to Affirm — Louisiana Financial Assistance Commission v. Poindexter
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Affirm · 1968
A10), On October 19, 1966, the United States filed-its motion, ° for leave to intervene as a party plaintiff pursuant to © Section 902 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.0. 2000h-2) and Rule 24 … Aaron, supra; Andersonv: ~ ~° | Martin, 375 U.S. 399; Lombard v. Louisiana, 373 U.S. | 267 ; ‘NAACP. v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449; Hamm v. Virginia State Board of Elections, 230 F.
389 U.S. 571Appendix — Franco-Gomez v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1982
Fulton, 549 F.24 1325, 1327 (9th Cir. 1977); United States v. McLaughlin, $25 F.2d $17, 520-21 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 427 U.S. 904 (1976); United States v. … Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 34 (1970), and United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 177-78, n. 14 (1074). Because the : © government failed to meet its burden in this case, we reverse.”
459 U.S. 1018Reply Brief — RODGERS v. UNITED STATES (Nos. 79-1030, 79-1028, 1029)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1979
Local 50, 294 F.2d 399 (2d Cir. 1961), aff’d on other grounds, 370 U.S. 254 (1962), when the equally-divided en banc court, by a 4-2 vote, affirmed the district court rather than the panel, and his … United States, No. 78-1202, 48 L.W. 4250 (March 18, 1980). 7 failure to include a bribery instruction in connection with the mail fraud counts is of no material conse- quence (Brief in Opp., at pp. 24
Petitioners Brief — Graham & Foster v. Goodcell
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1931
On February 24, 1921 the petitioner filed a claim for abatement covering this additional assess- ment and also the additional assessment of $13,299.62, for 1918. … S. 399). Wiborg v. United States, (163 U. S. 632). Every word of a statute is to be given effect. Wil- mot vy. Mudge, (103, U. S., 217); Early v.
282 U.S. 409Opinion — Tutun v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1926
United States, 94 U.S. 397, 399. Or it may provide only a legal remedy. Compare Turner v. United States, 248 U. 8. 354. … No. 4984, pp. 18-24. The section makes no reference to appellate proceedings.
270 U.S. 568Prologue — Dentsply International, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2006
OPINIONS BELOW The Third Circuit’s opinion is reported at 399 F.3d 181. (Pet. App. la-26a). The district court’s opinion is reported at 2/7 F. Supp. 2d 387. (Pet. App. 27a-145a). … JURISDICTION The Third Circuit issued its judgment on February 24, 2005, and denied a timely petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc on May 17, 2005. (Pet. App. 146a-47a).
546 U.S. 1089Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bourns, Inc. v. Allen-Bradley Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973
The decree of the Court of Appeals. entered on June 14, 1973, appears at A-24. The order of the Court of Appeals deny- ing a rehearing appears at A-25. … Kolodziejski, 399 U.S. 204 (1970); Cipriano v. City of Houma, 395 U.S. 701 (1969); and Allen v. State Board of Elections, 393 U.S. 544 (1969).
414 U.S. 1094Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Frankel v. New Jersey
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1973
J. 399, 217 A. 2d 441 (1966)... = 4-7 ul TABLE OF CONTENTS Steenback, In re, 34 N. J. 89, 167 A. 2d 397 (1961)... Teine, In re, 17 N. J. 170, 110 A, 2d 93 (1954)............ United States vy. … The court gave | i her 24 hours to reconsider her position, warning her that! { it would hold her in contempt of court if she did not change it (Pa6).
409 U.S. 1125Motion — DeLong Corp. v. Oregon ex rel. State Highway Commission
Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1973
Standard Oil Company of California, 399 U.S. 222. We are assuming that in a case originating in the Oregon state courts the motion should be filed in this Court. … STEPHANIE SLATER Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: 1/24/75 SEAL : ee OLLIE FOIE COE EIR IGE
411 U.S. 965Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Speten v. Bowles
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1945
Russell, 298 N.Y. 492, 58 N. . 24 508 5 OQeeanic Sieam Navigation Co. v. Stranahan, 214. … Mitchell, 303 U. 8. 391, 399-404, and cases cited therein. 5 Petitioner’s answer did not advert to the Fifth Amend- ment but to Article IIL, Section 2 and the Sixth Amendment ax support for the constitutional
324 U.S. 877Petition — Edwards v. Tennessee
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977
Green, 399 U.S., at 161.” 400 U.S. 74, at p. 79. —_ Mrs. … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 90 S.Ct. 1930, 26 L.Ed. 2d 489 (1969), the Supreme Court, while refusing to set forth a theory that would determine the validity of all such hear- say ‘exceptions’ (399 U.S. at
429 U.S. 1061Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Gene Rechtzigel, Petitioner v. City of Apple Valley, Minnesota
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 29, 2019
Haraden, 280 Minn. 399, 159 N.W2d 907(1968) ..................................................................7 C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. … Asian Women United of Minnesota,A16-0360 (May 24, 2017)................................22 M.C.D.A. v.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.