Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

0.20s

  • Opposition Brief — Louis Gaskin, Petitioner v. Florida

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 8, 2023

    State 218 So.3d 399 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S.Ct. 471 (2017)... cceeecccecseecceseseeeees 4 Gaskin v. … State, 218 So.3d 399 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S.Ct. 471 (2017); Gaskin v. State, 237 So.3d 928 (Fla. 2018), cert. denied, 139 S.Ct. 327 (2018); Gaskin v. State, No.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — AMG Capital Management, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Trade Commission

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 7, 2020

    SEC ......................... 24 III. … Id. at 399 (emphasis added).

  • Reply Brief — Michigan Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission, et al., Applicants v. Donald Agee Jr., et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jan 18, 2024

    Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ................................................................................................ 22 Lewis v. … Doc. 106, 4 Trial Tr. 96:24–97:10. Moreover, Dr.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Tamer Mahmoud, et al., Petitioners v. Thomas W. Taylor, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 10, 2025

    S. at 399-402). Similarly, both Trinity Lutheran v. Comer and Espinoza v. … Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923).

  • Reply Brief — Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians, et al., Applicants v. Michael Howe, Secretary of State of North Dakota

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jul 23, 2025

    Milligan, 599 U.S. 1 (2023) .................................................................. 9, 13, 24 Allen v. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ................. 10 Maine v. Thiboutot, 448 U.S. 1 (1980) ........................................................................ 10 Medina v.

  • Petition — Local Union No. 35 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. City of Hartford

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981

    Carey, (1979) 48 N.Y. 2d 826, 399 N.E. 2d 1203 (affirming 62 A.D. 798, 406 NYS 2d 888). … (P’s Court of Appeals brief, pp. 43-44). 24 of itself, a requirement to hire or refuse to hire on the basis of race.

    453 U.S. 913
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Thomas A. Ayre v. State of Maryland

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1974

    New York, 399 U.S. 66 ........... er Braverman v. Bar Association, 209 Md. 328........... 24 Chicago G.P.R. Co. v. Bosham, 249 U.S. 164........... 3 Cole v. … N_Y., 399 U.S. 66; and Codispoti v. Pennsylvania, No. 73-5615 decided June 26, 1974. 4.

    419 U.S. 1073
  • Motion — American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1977

    District of Columbia before judgment, the object in both cases being to obtain review in this Court of a Memorandum Opinion and Order on Jurisdictional Issues issued by the district court on November 24 … Nixon, 418 U.S, 683 (1974); New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S, 292 (1970).

    429 U.S. 1071
  • Respondents Opposing Brief — Goggin v. Division of Labor Law Enforcement of Cal.

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Opposing Brief · 1949

    A. “(2d). 1944), 139 F. (24) 935. … A. 5, 1943), 134 F, (2d) 399, at page 401, in interpreting the effect of Section 67, sttbdivision.

    336 U.S. 118
  • Opposition Brief — Santa Cruz Co. v. Labor Board

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1938

    Exhs. 15, 24, 28, 34). It is located in the San Francisco Bay area, the greatest shipping center in the United States for canned fruit and vege- tables (Bd. Exhs. 25, 35). … OL LE WOE OS Og (Po 1 eer _ ws ‘ — . - SSE oa tH tee 18 399; Southern Railway Co. v. United States, 222 _U.8. 20.

    303 U.S. 453
  • Prologue — Thomas v. Tennessee (No. 05-872)

    Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005

    Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 (1973) ........... 5,9 We CI 399 U.Bi29, 219 FRED 6 ke ae eae 10 Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 114 (1977) ............ 7 Neil v. … NCJ 161258, 24 CPE oleae chs Sek Reed Reb owas sebes l PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner, Howard Walter Thomas, respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the Opinion and

  • Respondents Brief in Opposition — Magruder v. Supplee

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief in Opposition · 1942

    Plestcheeff, 100 i". s 24) 62. Lie a Commissioner’ Vv. Coward, 110 F. (2d 725 - 4,7,8 Commissioner v. Patrick Cudahy F. Co. 110 F. 42d) = 925 Vises = an Walsh-McGuire Co. v. … The opinion (R. 28), of the Circuit Court of Appeals is, reported in 123 F. (2d) 399. = 2° | ; 7 JURISDICTION.

    316 U.S. 394
  • Brief for the Respondent — Carpenter v. Wabash Railway Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent · 1940

    Wabash aoe Com-’ pany equity bow ebongs expired ‘more than- seven years _ prior to the ndment of ‘August 11, 1939 (R. 24). … Aetna ° Indemnity Co., 91 Conn. 399 (1917); Spooner v. Blair, 209 -lowa 1113 (1930) ; Matchan v. Phoenix Land Inv. Co., 139 © Minn, 132 (1924) ; and Fletcher, Cyclopedia Corporations — ~ (Perm.

    309 U.S. 23
  • Prologue — Gementera v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005

    PUNISHMENT CONFLICTS WITH OTHER CIRCUITS ‘ND THIS COURTS PRECEDENT INTERPRETING THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT’S PROSCRIPTION OF CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENTS. .................... 20 ee Be ARR EIB EN See os 24 … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) .............ccceeceeeees 21 Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972) ..........ccccccsecseeeees 22 Houchins v.

    546 U.S. 1031
  • Opposition — Fidelity Construction Co. v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983

    Petitioner contends that the question whether interest accrues on an uncertified claim is “of exceptional impor- tance” and is causing “confusion” for government contrac- tors (Pet. 24). … Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 399 (1976), quoting United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 4 (1969), and therefore 28 U.S.C. (Supp. V) 2412(d)(3) cannot authorize payment of a fee award here.

    464 U.S. 826
  • Motion — Morris v. Duby

    Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1927

    appeal entered on the 29th day of October, 1926; and vacate the order and decree herein; and further these appellants again renew their application made for a Stay applied for in this Court on May 24 … A. 399, 131 Fed. 415. In the ease at bar the order of the Commission may to some extent (the exact extent it is unnec- essary to define) be the basis of further proceed- ings.

    274 U.S. 135
  • Opposition — Taibe v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980

    Petitioner suggests (Pet. 24, 30) that coercion must be implied because petitioner was carrying contraband and thus would not have consented to be searched voluntarily. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 52 (1970). 4.

    444 U.S. 1071
  • Opposition — Florida v. Coler

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983

    Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970) Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977) Coler v. State, 418 So.2d 238 (Pla. 1982) Collins v. State, 550 $.W.2d 643 (Tenn. 1977) Enmund v. … Powell on September 24, 1982. A THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DID NOT DECIDE A FEDERAL QUESTION WARRANTING THIS COURT'S REVIEW.

    459 U.S. 1127
  • Reply Brief — Connecticut v. Colton

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1996

    Kennedy, 456 U.S. 667, 102 S.Ct. 2083, 72 L.EG.24 416 (1982) ........... peawsoe Mee Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989, 6 op Sere rerr wy a ad State v. … Wurzbach, 280 US. 396, 399, 50 S.Ct. 167, 169, 74 L.Ed. 508 (1930). Nor does the respondent’s reference to this Court’s denial of certiorari in other cases buttress his argument.

    516 U.S. 1140
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Albert Randolph, Petitioner v. Texas

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 13, 2023

    Amend. (4) Brady v, Maryland, 373 Us, 83,10 L.Ed, Ad 215,83 Sed. 194 C1IES); Thomas v- State, M1) Swe 8d 399 (Tex. … LEXTS 24° Ex, pacte Miller, 2006 Tex, Crim« Dep. unpub. LEK TS 207. ~CONCLUSION The petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted.

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.