Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

0.14s

  • Appendix — Noble v. Oklahoma City

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1936

    D., 399), the. practice as indicated and the distinction between rights-of-way under general and special acts was preserved and reannounced. … It will be borne in mind that the excepting or reservation dause involved ‘was not an exclusion or elimination of an arce of land but was a clause stating that the patent or con- 24 ’_.

    297 U.S. 481
  • Supplemental Appendix — Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Appendix · 2003

    See also reference to transportation of 69 kilos of cocaine and of 20 kilos of cocaine (Tr. 1-24-96, p. 399; Tr. 1-25-96, p. 438). 7 Transcript 2-14-96, pp. 2371-2382, 2384, 2386. 8 Apprendi v.

    540 U.S. 876
  • Opposition Brief — Jordan Winczuk, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Nov 20, 2023

    . § 2C:24-4b(5)(1) (West 2009). C.A. Sealed App. 18. Based on those prior convictions, the presentence report found that petitioner was subject to Section 2251(e)’s second enhancement. … Moore, 71 F.4th 392, 399 (5th Cir. 2023) (rejecting same limiting argument), petition for cert. pending, No. 23-219 (filed Sept. 5, 2023).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Piper Lakay Ellis Snowton, Petitioner v. United States, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 8, 2020

    App’x 397, 399 (5th Cir. 2011) (per curcarr ~s Cartrell v. Gaylor, 981 F.2d 254, 256 (5th Cir. 1993)); see alsoMeriive:h€~: ABC _ -aining/Safety Council Tex. … Oct. 24, 2016) (“Courts ‘may raise the :u= tutus rua spontep and, “‘where it is clear from the face of a complaint filed in for^i.z pez~p*~n£ that the claims asserted are barred by the applicable statute

  • Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Board of Public Education, School District of Philadelphia v. Intille (No. 448)

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1960

    «> | FILED | OCT 24 1950 JAMES 8. Chewaen, C'erk IN THE Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 1960. No. 448. … Beilan, 357 U.S. 399 (1958) (Ginvolving the questions of an administrative superior) and brought it within the authority of Slochower v..Board 6f Higher Education of New York City, 850 U.S. 551 (1956

  • Petitioners Brief — Harvey v. City of St. Petersburg

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1940

    Augustine, 139 So. 885, 104 Fla. 399. EER yes ac Sian Ala Nt dy = # = 4 4 : be : : ie 12 Equity Is Without Power to Appoint a Receiver to Levy and Collect Taxes. … S. 734, 24 L.

    311 U.S. 697
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Roy E. Terrell, Petitioner v. Florida

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 5, 2024

    State, 305 So. 3d 640 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (same; erroneous instruction on knowledge element of attempted murder of law enforcement officer). 24 7a The error is fundamental even if the erroneous instruction … Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970), held that state court juries as small as six were constitutionally permissible, despite the determination in Thompson v.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Benisek v. Lamone, 138 S. Ct. 50 (2017) (No. 17-333)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

    Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 FREE REED a ie dees a ee Pe 24, 29 LULAC v. Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ..............cceeeeeeeee 24 Matal v. Tam, 137 S. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 418 (2006) (Kennedy, J.).

  • Brief for Petitioner — Lanza v. New York

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for Petitioner · 1962

    “op. 24.) The jail officials could have refused to allow Joseph Lanza to communicate with his family. … Hodge. 334 US 24). In Lanza v. New York State Jomt Legislative Committes SN.

    370 U.S. 139
  • Brief for the United States — Davis v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1973

    United States, 430 F. 2d 399, certiorari denied, 401 U.S. 92111. 12 Bastillo v. United States, 421 F. 2d 131. 8 Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U. S. 42 . 43,4 Chapman v. … NL 2, 5 16112, 13, 14, 15¼16, 20, 21, 23, 24, 26, 28, 81.

    411 U.S. 233
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. B. P. J., By Her Next Friend and Mother, Heather Jackson

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 19, 2025

    (Jan. 24, 2025), vi https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2025/01/ 24/the_ constitution_provides_answers_to_our_federal_deb t_problem_152236.html ......................................... 24 Deborah … Supp. 3d 377, 399 (W.D. La. 2024).

  • Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Jacoby v. Supreme Court of New Jersey

    Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1982

    Rush, 46 N.J. 399, 217 A.2d 441 (1966) —— 2 Virginia Pharmacy v. Va. Citizens Consumer Coun- cil, 425 U.S. 748 (1976) 6, 7, 14, 15, 17 Williamson v. … Rush, 46 N.J. 399, 411-412, 217 A.2d 441, 447 (1966). misled.”

    459 U.S. 962
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Arizona School Choice Trust v. Winn

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011

    CINE IIE oe a ne kk ae ea 2,4 State Statutes 24 5S. OtAl. ANN, 6 Or aO00- cece Rew eek te: 11 PPIE Tee CR. … Mueller, 463 U.S. at 399 (citing Widmar v. Vincent, 454 U.S. 263, 274 (1981)); sce also Zelman, 536 U.S. at 652.

    563 U.S. 932
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Epic Sys. Corp. v. Lewis, 138 S. Ct. 42 (2017) (No. 16-285)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

    Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 24 (1983)). … Rev. 399, 433 (2008).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. American Library Assn., Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

    Board of Trs. of Loudon County Library, 24 F. Supp. 2d 552, 563 (E.D. … See League of Women Voters, 468 U.S. at 399-400.

    539 U.S. 194
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Tanco v. Haslam, 135 S. Ct. 1040 (2015) (No. 14-562)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

    Ct. 399 (2014).................... 4 Rainey v. Bostic, 135 S. Ct. 286 (2014)....................... 4 Sierra Mil. Health Servs., Inc. v. United States, 58 Fed. Cl. 573 (Fed. … Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, Important Information on Marriage, http//www.va.gov/opa/marriage............... 7, 21-22, 24 U.S.

  • Respondents Reply Brief — Henderson v. Kibbe

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Reply Brief · 1977

    Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966) .....---+-- 17 Henderson v. Morgan, 96 S. Ct. 2253 (1976) .....--->> 14 Herring v. New York, 422 U.S. 853 (1975) «-. eee eee 18 Herron v. … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399, 403-404 (1966); cf Barnes v. United States, 412 U.S. 837 (1973): Turner v. United States, 396 U.S. 398, 419 (1970); Leary v.

    431 U.S. 145
  • Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Simms v. Superior Court of California

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1972

    Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 26 L. … Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 26 L. Ed. 2d 586, 90 S.

    404 U.S. 1016
  • Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Gomez v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1974

    Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970) Blue v. United States, 342 F.2d 894 (D.C. Cir. 1964).. 16 Dancy v. United States, 361 F.2d 75 (D.C. Cir. 1966).. 16 Davis v. … Added April 24, 1972, eff. Oct. 1, 1972. 18 U.S.C. § 3060, Preliminary Examination. §3060. Preliminary examination. . . .

    415 U.S. 948
  • Opposition Brief — Jou v. First Insurance Co. of Hawaii, Ltd.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2005

    Kiroff, 399 F.Supp. 409 (N.D. Ohio 597) acccccrsecosssensounsosenpunessebneneliseuisienliannnnaan ‘ceiissiantenieae 8 Maher v. Roe, 432 U.S. 464. 97 S. Ct. 2376, 53 L. Ed. 2d 484 ( POT T? … Kiroff, 399 F.Supp. 409 (N.D. Ohio 1975), rev'd on other grounds 549 F.2d 1052 (6" Cir. 1977), cert. denied 431 U.S. 968, 97 S.Ct. 2926, 53 L.Ed. 2d 1064 (1977).

    544 U.S. 976

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.