Documents

Reply Brief — Lindh v. Murphy

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1997

RB 20-24; CJLF 3-16; WLF 2-11. … CJLF 23-24.

Opposition Brief — In re Albert

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986

PAGE 15 21 16 18 24 COUNTERSTATEMENT OF THE CASE I. … (R:376- 378, 398-399, 403, 405; JA:204, 254-258, 262, 278) The fourth witness called by the Helminskis was Dr. Thomas Corbett. Dr.

Opposition Brief — Pauly v. McCarthy

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1947

Ed. 189, r Ken 15, 22, 24 Bruner v. McCarthy, 105 Utah 399, 142 P. (2d) 649. 3 Cawman v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines, 110 II. 20 Ehalt v. … S. 469, at page 475, 24 L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Robert A. Rucho, et al., Appellants v. Common Cause, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 8, 2019

Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 448 (2006) (“LULAC”) (Stevens, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (emphasis added). … Ct. 24 1916 (2018).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ricky Ray Malone, Petitioner v. Tommy Sharp, Interim Warden

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 15, 2019

Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 (1973) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22, 24 Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Knowles v. … Royal, 886 F.3d 874 (10th Cir. 2018) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24, 25 Grant (John) v. Trammell, 727 F.3d 1006 (10th Cir. 2013) .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Hanson v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. Norma Anderson, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 18, 2024

New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970) .................................................. 25 Barnhart v. … Va. 1869) ....................... 23, 24 Hamling v.

Application — Orlando Cordia Hall, Applicant v. T.J. Watson, Warden

Supreme Court brief · Application · Nov 19, 2020

Nov. 6, 2020), Dkt. #24; see also Mem. Op., Hall v. Barr et al., No. 20-cv03184 (D.D.C. Nov. 16, 2020), Dkt. #23. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986) (plurality op.). Failure to stay the mandate also risks the “irreparable harm” of “foreclos[ing] * * * certiorari review by this Court.” Garrison v.

Respondents Brief — Advance Colorado, et al., Petitioners v. Jena Griswold, Colorado Secretary of State

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Jan 3, 2025

NO. 24-216 In the Supreme Court of the United States _______________________ ADVANCE COLORADO, ET AL., Petitioners, v. … Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964) ................................................ 17 Bierman v. Dayton, 817 F.3d 1070 (8th Cir. 2016) ................................ 20 Buckley v. Am.

Brief for the United States in Opposition — Klapprott v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1949

): The court said (RR. 24-2 * = 6 It is our opinion that the de fe nel- ant’s. initiation of this actionat this late date - The district court denied the motion Ch. 26). … , ‘the order of the district court Wis” _afirmed: (R. 41),-one judge relying primarily on the absence of jurisdiction, although also noting the lack of equity in petitioner's applic ation (R. 32-399¢

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Winbourne

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1985

Judgment limiting Eastern’s liability to $225,000.00, plus interest, was entered on January 24, 1983. (Appendix A.) … Wiser, 555 F.2d 1079, 1089 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 922, 98 S.Ct. 399, 54 L.Ed.2d 279 (1977). Domangue v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 542 F.Supp. 643, 653 (E.D. La. 1982).

Respondents Brief — Wolfson v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1984

JURISDICTION The judgment of the court of appeals was entered on April 24, 1984. A petition for rehearing was denied on May 29, 1984. … called for a response by the attorneys.” 461 4&8. at 399.

Petition — Wright v. Georgia

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

Within time provided by law, the Petitioner filed a Mo- tion for Rehearing in the Court of Appeals of Georgia, said Motion being overruled and denied by the Court of Appeals on April 24, 1980. … marijuana was discovered in plain view on top of a dresser in the master bedroom along 2a with a metric scale, some ziplock plastic bags, several small brown “coin” envelopes, a tin can containing $1,- 399

Appendix — United States ex rel. Potts v. Rabb

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1944

Pothier, 264 U. 8. 399, 402- 403; Johnson v. Hoy, 227 U. S. 245, 247; Glasgow v. Moyer, 225 U. S. 420, 428-430; cf. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn., 319 U. S. 21, 25. … United States, 24 F. (2d) 405, 407-408 (C. C. A. 8); Nanfito v. United States, 20 F. (2d) 376, 378 (C. C. A. 8); United States v. Rubin, 218 Fed. 245, 247-249 (D.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lalako Jonathan Jose, Petitioner v. Arizona

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 3, 2025

Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 86 (1970) (“hold[ing] that the 12-man panel is not a necessary ingredient of ‘trial by jury’”); see also State v. … CR-24-0136-PR Court of Appeals, Division Two No. 2 CA-CR 23-0224 Pima County Superior Court No.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. Barbara, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 25, 2026

Hall, 4 Cal. 399 (1854)................................................ 18 Quock Ting v. United States, 140 U. S. 417 (1891) .................................... 21, 22 Tape v. … Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) ................. 7, 8, 9, 11, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27 Yick Wo v.

Opposition Brief — Lanham Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2004

The petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on August 24, 2004. The jurisdiction of this court is invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1). . STATEMENT 1. … Kia Motors America, Inc., 357 F.3d 392, 398-399 (3d Cir. 2004). The next step is typically to examine the defendant’s petition for removal. Mehlenbacher, 216 F.3d at 296.

Reply Brief — Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Chittum

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1996

with evidence of Chit- tum’s likely future pay increases, R. 292A-292E, as well as his inability to increase the retirement pension annuity he would re- ceive after his disability annuity expired, R. 399 … Respondent’s tortured history of the Culver case, Opp. 23-24, does nothing to reduce the relevance of this issue under the LHWCA.

Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Hostetter v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1941

Herbert Hostetter, (Unre- ported opinion of the Orphans’ Court)..... 19 In re Estate of Miller, 184 Cal. 674.............. 11 In re Estate of Rath, 10 Cal. (2d) 399.......... 11 In re Heilbron Bros … A. 413........ 24 Lentz v. Commissioner, 21 B. T. A. 1336, 1342.. 24 Quinn v. Union Nat. Bk., 32 Fed. (2d) 762...... 13 United States v. Kombst, 286 U.S. 424......... 11 Washburn v.

Opinion — Nadal v. May

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1914

The validating act of February 24, 1903, was not ef- fectual. … Eq. 394, 399; Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. Texas, 170 U. 8. 243, 261. See also Gunn v. Barry, 15 Wall. 610, 622; Ar- nett v. Reade, 220 U.S. 311, 320.

Opinion — Munsey v. Webb

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1913

A. 399. To the same effect are: Reeves vy. Wallace, 10 Wall. 176; Morrison vy. Davis, 20 Pa. St. 293; Cuff v. N. & M. Y. R. Co., 35 N. J. L. 18; Smith v. Kanawha County (West Va.), 8 L. R. … (Va.), 24 8. E. Rep. 467; Fowlks v. Southern Ry. Co. (Va.), 32 8. E. Rep. 464; Winfree v. Jones (Va.), 51 S. E. Rep. 153; S. C., 1 L. R. A. (N. S.), 201.