Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Seafreeze Shoreside, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Department of the Interior, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 9, 2025

For example, the court noted that Loper Bright pointed to provisions of the Clean Water Act and Clean Air Act that not only used broad language but also explicitly empowered agencies to regulate based … During construction periods between 2021 and 2030, use of stationary lift vessels in the lease areas and cranes at port locations would further increase navigational complexity in areas immediately around

Amicus Curiae Brief — The American Legion, et al., Petitioners v. American Humanist Association, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 30, 2019

military to act as a cohesive unit. … their longstanding history of military service, Muslim servicemembers shared that they had encountered “knuckleheaded comments equating them with terrorists.”

Opposition Brief — OIL, CHEMICAL AND ATOMIC WORKERS INT. U. V. DUNLOP (Nos. 75-71, 75-75)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1974

Written comments were invited. … The 400 air contaminant standards had originally been issued under the Walsh-Healey Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 95-45.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — American Airlines, Inc. v. Wolens

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992

Comment: Again, because many consumers may only travel during certain periods of the year, fairness re- quires that awards be valid for at least a full twelve month cycle. 3.5 Fees Any airline which … acement during that period.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Feitt v. Office of Thrift Supervision, Department of Treasury

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992

The Clean Air Act expressly set forth the procedural route and timing for judicial review of Environmental Protection Agency action. … When faced with a similar attempt to circumvent statutory limitations on judicial review of agency action involving the Clean Air Act, this court held: Because the Act explicitly provides for review

Amicus Curiae Brief — Knick v. Twp. of Scott, 139 S. Ct. 50 (2018) (No. 17-647)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

Both Williamson County and this case were brought under the Federal Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. … It is ample to lay out zones where family values, youth values, and the blessings of quiet seclusion and clean air make the area a sanctuary for people.” (Village of Belle Terre v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Am. Legion v. Am. Humanist Ass'n, 139 S. Ct. 451 (2018) (No. 17-1717)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

our milit»ry to act as a cohesive unit. … More recently, as a civilian rabbi, he invoked at President Obama's signing of the Recovery Act bill in Denver, CO.

Amicus Curiae Brief — SD Warren Co. v. Maine Bd. of Environmental Protection

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

§ 791a et seq., and no other provision of the Clean Water Act allows the States adequately to address dams’ effects. … Petitioner’s Interpretation of Section 401 Would Frustrate the Purposes of the Clean Water Act.

Opposition Brief — Acmat Corp. v. School District of Philadelphia

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

of Ged, acts or neglect of the School District, acts or neglect of any other contractor, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine, restrictions, strikes, or freight embargoes, the period hereinabove specified … , acts or neglect of the School District, acts or neglect of any other contractor, fires, floods, epidem- ics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, or freight embargoes, the period herein- above specified

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — DJM, Ltd. v. Island Yachting Management, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005

(UTPA) provides that a plaintiff may initiate a civil action against a party who has engaged in “{ujnfair methods of competition, unconscionable acts or practices and unfair or deceptive acts in the … Allow time for questions, concerns and comments from owner. Respond accordingly and in a prompt fashion.

Opposition — Austin v. Unarco Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983

It is scarcely more helpful to indulge in the euphemism that the decedent was ‘cleaning’ part of the ship, and to say that it is a traditional duty of seamen to keep their ship clean." … Comment "n" to section 402A provides as follows: atu "n. Contributory negligence.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Clark v. Fancher

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995

(Tr. 1044) During this general time period, Ms. … Hunkapiller also commented concerning the “honeycombing effect” on the concrete observed in the video.

Petitioners Brief — Orloff v. Willoughby

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1953

Ree. 13711, 81st Cong. 2nd Sess. _ | ee Ae The purpose of section 5 of the Act was to deny to, those ' who were inducted under the act the extta compensation of _ $100:a month, Conbress believi ing … But working as a laboratéry technician or, as Judge Goodman put it, ‘‘cleaning sponges or ingtruments in an - operating room’?

Petition — Pilgrim Equipment Co. v. Usery

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976

'® The cumulative effect is best described by the often quoted comment by Mr. … At the end of each one week period, the contracting company agrees to bill the contract opera- tor for the total amount of laundry and dry cleaning work performed for the substation, and the contract

Amicus Brief — Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1983

The agency would propose after receiving and considering these comments to “issue any supplemental decision . . . within 45 days after the close of the comment period.” Pet. App. 133a. … Under the instrue- tions of this Court in Ford, supra, it is clear that the Court of Appeals here acted properly, when its “comment” period had finally closed with a response or rebuttal from the agency

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — CTS Corp. v. Waldburger, 134 S. Ct. 2175 (2014) (No. 13-339)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2014

Finally, because the period begins to run when the defendant commits his last act, rather than when the plaintiff has knowledge of harm, its “commencement date .. . … These chemicals have leached into the air and water. (/d. 4 33.)

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Moses v. United States (No. 07-1195)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007

It’s just off the edge. 5 position that there was no Clean Water Act jurisdiction. Periodically, for the next 20 years, Mr. … Moses for the same periodic maintenance that he had been performing for twenty years. This Court in Rapanos reversed the expansive trend in Clean Water Act jurisdiction.

Brief for the United States in Opposition — Weinstein v. New York

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1963

y Air Base. Bidding at the Air Base was similarly @¢ competitive-for the eight contract periods from 1952 to 1954. … > yd © ahaa Y the ultimate awards, it was proper for government counsel to comment on the base prices in the summa- tion. .

Amicus Curiae Brief — Stoneridge Inv. Partners v. Scientific-Atl.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

Act’s anti-fraud provi- sion. … Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 843-44 (1984) (uphold- ing EPA’s construction of Clean Air Act term “stationary source”).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — George H. Finn, Petitioner v. New York, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 14, 2023

(cleaned up). … (cleaned up).