Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.14s
Appendix — Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Hercules Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1985
It is not penalized for acting responsibly. … The issue of liability, of PECO or Hercules, under the Clean Streams Law pursuant to which the DER purported to act,'” has 16.
474 U.S. 980Opposition Brief — ABC Air Freight Co. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1970
As the court below said, ‘‘ Although comments on the proposed regulations were due by May 23, 1969, the Board has not yet acted upon them, and review would .thus be premature’? (App. 12).° 4. … It is interesting to note that review was not sought within the stat- utory period of sixty days after November 12, 1969. Section 1006(a) of the Act, 49 U.S.C. 1486(a).
397 U.S. 1006Amicus Brief — Agins v. City of Tiburon
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1980
Water Act § 402, 33 U.S.C. § 1842), safe drinking water controls (Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1421), air emis- 7 sion controls (Clean Air Act § 110(a) (2), 42 U.S.C … Consider the range of consequences such a disruption would involve: How would the air rights over a site be measured?
447 U.S. 255Opposition Brief — City of New York v. Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2011
to the challenged rules and the Clean Air Act’s (“CAA”) preemption provision are also relevant to this action: Rules of the City of New York tit. 35 § 3- 03(c)10)-(11) (JA31-32) 42 U.S.C. § 7543( … The only vehicles qualifying under the 25/30 MPG Rules were ones with hybrid or “clean diesel” engines.’
562 U.S. 1264Transcript of Record — Maty v. Grasselli Chemical Co.
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1938
When you worked outside there was that clean or was that dusty, too? A. In the sand ears, itis clean. | Q. In the sand cars it is clean? A. … I found that an exceptiaqnally clean plant; there is no cause to report any vioiation of the law in that section. ae Q. Did you find the air full of dust? A. I did not. i Q.
303 U.S. 197Transcript of Record — Rickert Rice Mills, Inc. v. Fontenot
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1936
In the case of tobacco, the base period shall be the postwar period, August 1919-July 1929. … . | (1) The term “State Sai period” means the period _ of calendar years 1929 to 1933, inclusive.
297 U.S. 110Amicus Curiae Brief — Am. Legion v. Am. Humanist Ass'n, 139 S. Ct. 451 (2018) (No. 17-1717)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
our milit»ry to act as a cohesive unit. … More recently, as a civilian rabbi, he invoked at President Obama's signing of the Recovery Act bill in Denver, CO.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Mar 7, 2025
Boule, 596 U.S. 482, 491 (2022) (cleaned up). … Gaubert, 499 U.S. 315, 324 (1991), or legally conferred discretion “based on considerations of In margin comments to the original 1946 enactment of the FTCA, the exceptions were described as: (a) (“Act
Appendices — North Star Steel Co. v. Thomas
Supreme Court brief · Appendices · 1995
right of first hire against other air carriers. … City Cleaning Co., Inc., 982 F.2d 89 (3d Cir. 1992) (applying Pennsylvania law when deciding limitations period for union’s suit to enforce a grievance committee’s award under § 301 of the Federal Labor
513 U.S. 1072Petition for Writ of Certiorari — CTS Corp. v. Waldburger, 134 S. Ct. 2175 (2014) (No. 13-339)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2014
Finally, because the period begins to run when the defendant commits his last act, rather than when the plaintiff has knowledge of harm, its “commencement date .. . … These chemicals have leached into the air and water. (/d. 4 33.)
Opposition Brief — Consolidated Edison Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001
The Act provides for the federal government to absorb the lion’s share of the clean-up costs. … United States Department of the Air Force, 111 F.3d 37 (6th Cir. 1997), and Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v.
534 U.S. 1054Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Murphy v. IRS, 128 S. Ct. 2050 (2008) (No. 07-802)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2008
The Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. §2622 (1994); The Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. §300j-9(1) (1994); The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7622 (1994); The Solid Waste Disposal Act, 42 U.S.C … The Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2622 (1994); The Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300j-9(I) (1994); The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7622 (1994); The Solid Waste Disposal Act, 42 U.S.C
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 29, 2025
Champion Nat Sec., Inc., 952 F.3d 570,581 (5th Cir. 2020) (cleaned up). … Coleman does not dispute that Norris was not 17 disclosed within the discovery period.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2019
As interpreted by the Fourth Circuit, the Hobbs Act would also raise a serious question about whether ® This Court has not considered the constitutionality of provi- sions in the Clean Air Act and other … Air Act].”).
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1888
It must be well venti- lated and must be kept in strictly good condition, so that the air will be very pure, and clean. … I do not ‘care if a brewer is competent to brew; he must be strictly clean also, and then he will save his beer by good air in the cellars.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Exxon Corp. v. Eyak Native Village
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994
Cee ie or os So ee Vv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Page(s) Air-Shields, Inc. v. Fullam, ee a Ee” CA. | Nala eee 9, 10 Am. Fire & Casualty Co. v. … Ct. 1100 (1994); In re Digicon Marine, Inc., 966 F.2d 158, 160 (Sth Cir. 1992); Air-Shields, 891 F.2d at 65; Wilson, 888 F.2d at 781 n. 1.
513 U.S. 943Opposition Brief — Grand Canyon Trust v. Federal Aviation Administration
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999
The Act further required the FAA, within 90 days, and after notice and comment, to “issue a final plan for the management of air traffic in the air space above the Grand Canyon.” § 3(b)(2), 101 Stat … The FAA received more than 14,000 comments. Jd. at 69,305. 3. On December 31, 1996, the FAA issued the Final Rule.
526 U.S. 1158Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Kizziar v. Dollar
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1959
This testimony was erroneously arse and acted. … These include such minor items as unfinished painting, cleaning of.
361 U.S. 914Record and brief — EPA v. National Resources Defense Council, Inc. (Nos. 83-1373, 83-1013)
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1984
August 20, 1984 A-l CLEAN WATER ACT PROVISIONS 1. Section 208(bN2"C) of the Clean Water Act, as amended, MUS.C. … Section Olri) of the Clean Water Act, as amended. 151 5.0.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — McLaren v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994
following a period of silence. … Within a few months, McLaren began an abhorrent sexual excapade with his stepdaughters, progressing from initial experiments of indecent acts with the younger girl to forcible acts of sodomy with both
510 U.S. 1112
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.