Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.59s
Brief for the United States — Great Northern Railway Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1942
,.43 U.S. … R., 495 U.S. 540, 570. .
315 U.S. 262Opposition Brief — Hooman Ashkan Panah, Petitioner v. Ron Broomfield, Acting Warden
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jun 17, 2020
Id. at 423-424. Her husband responded that “she had to do what was right and that she should consult the Bible to see what it has to say.” Id. at 423. … App. 423.
Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Bowles
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1945
Co., 250 U.S. 607__. 5 Hillcrest Terrace Corp. v. … the regulations contain provisions for the reclassification of a retail store which ean show that its services and historic margins are typical of the group having the higher maximum prices (R. 481-482
324 U.S. 847Reply Brief — Fischer v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1992
Florida, 482 U.S. 423, 430 (1987); Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 29, 31 (1981). B. … Kramer, 955 U.S. 479, 482-83, 486 (7th Cir. 1992).
506 U.S. 998Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2008
Dallas Cap & Emblem Manufacturing, Inc., 510 F.2d 1004 (5th Cir.) 12 (“Boston Hockey”), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 868 (1975), and Supreme Assembly, Order of Rainbow for Girls v. J.H. … Indeed, from Boston Hockey, cert. denied, 423 U.S. 868 (1975), to International Order of Job’s Daughters v.
Emergency Application — Miguel Angel Delgado, Jr., Applicant v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Mar 20, 2026
(citing Whalen, 423 U.S. at 1316). … Boule, 596 U.S. 482, 494 (2022).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Andrews v. Fairley
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2010
Fermaint, 482 F.3d 897 (7th Cir. 2007). … Fermaint, 482 F.3d 897, 902 (7th Cir. 2007).
560 U.S. 924Petition — Sharon Hill v. David Max Garner
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
MIRANDA, 422 U.S. 332, 95 S. Ct. 2281, 45 L.Ed.2d — i 11,12 HUFFMAN v. PURSUE, Ltd., 420 U.S. 592, 95 S. Ct. 1200, 43 L.Ed. 2d 482, reh. denied, 421 U.S. 971, 95 S. Ct. 1969, 44 L.Ed. … Pursue, Ltd., 420 U.S. 592, 95 S. Ct. 1200, 43 L.Ed.2d 482, reh. denied, 421 U.S. 971, 95 S. Ct. 1969, 44 L.Ed.2d 463 (1975).
434 U.S. 989Amicus Curiae Brief — Collins v. Youngblood
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Florida, 482 U.S. 423, 433 (1987) (citation omitted). … Florida, 482 U.S. at 433.
497 U.S. 37Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ingram v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1986
(en bane), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 837, 96 S. Ct. 65, 46 L. … The 5 to 4 decision in U.S. v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423, 426 36 L. Ed. 2d 366, 93 S.
479 U.S. 822Reply Brief — Gedan v. Partington
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1990
Garden State Bar Ass’n, 457 U.S. 423 (1982) were indisputably nonfrivolous is ieee and merits review and reversal.' … Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 217-24 (1983); cf. First Lutheran Church v. Los Angeles County, 482 U.S. 304, 314 n.8 (1987).
497 U.S. 1020Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1982
Shannon, 516 F.2d 411 (Sth Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1034 (1975) *oeeneeeeree#ensteneeneeteeneeeeeee 16 Ozawa v. … Regester, 412 U.S. 755 (1973); see also Briscoe Vv. Bell, 432 U.S. 404, 406 & n.2 (1977); Cas- taneda v. Partida, 430 U.S. 482, 487, 495 ; Hernandez v. Texas, 347 U.S. 475, 478 (1954).
457 U.S. 202Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 31, 2021
Morse, 551 U.S. at 423 (Alito, J., concurring) (controlling opinion). … Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569 (1987).
Opposition — People Versus Porn v. Nixon
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981
Tryforos, 423 U.S. 1091, 96 S.Ct. 887 (1976) .. United States v. First Trust Company of Saint Paul, 251 F.2d 686 (8th Cir. 1958) ........... ‘sSaheptdarnetew dies United States v. … Try- foros, 423 U.S. 1091, 96 S.Ct. 887 (1976); Stevens v. Loomis, 334 F.2d 775, 778 (1st Cir. 1964); Greenberg v. Giannini, 140 F.2d 550, 554 (2d Cir. 1944) (per L.
452 U.S. 916Amicus Curiae Brief — Wilcox v. United States (No. 07-1336)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
Bornstein, 423 U.S. 303, 309, 46 L. Ed. 2d 514, 96 S. Ct. 523 (1976)). … /d. at 482. Then, relying on Smith v.
Opposition Brief — Peel v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2011
United States, 529 U.S. 694 (2000) . . 16 Major League Baseball Players Ass'n v. Garvey, baz US. 504 (Z00]) ...... 0. cee. LO Miller v. Florida, 482 U.S. 423 (1987) .... . 15 New York v. … Florida, 482 U.S. 423, 430 (1987) Lb A number of courts have thus correctly held that a conviction for the possession of child pornography does not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause, even if the defen
562 U.S. 1178Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 10, 2021
Bankers Ass’n, 575 U.S. 92 (2015) .............................................3, 7 Pirlott v. NLRB, 522 F.3d 423 (D.C. Cir. 2008) ...............................1 Republican Party of Minn. v. … J.L. & Liberty at 482 (footnote omitted). 35 Id. at 482–83. 36 Id. at 483. 13 staff will not support them nor that a court will undo their handiwork.”37 Take UC Health v. NLRB,38 in which the D.C.
Memorandum — Truitt v. Lenahan
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1976
Robson, 477 F.2d 13, 17 (C.A. 9), certiorari denied, 420 U.S. 927; United States v. McCorkle, 511 F.2d 482, 487-489 (C.A. 7) (en banc), certiorari denied, 423 U.S. 826. *VonderAhe vy.
427 U.S. 658Memorandum — Truitt v. Lenahan
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1976
Robson, 477 F.2d 13, 17 (C.A. 9), certiorari denied, 420 U.S. 927; United States v. McCorkle, 511 F.2d 482, 487-489 (C.A. 7) (en banc), certiorari denied, 423 U.S. 826. *VonderAhe v. Howland.
427 U.S. 658Supplemental Brief — Equibank v. Lash
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1992
Coyne, 482 U.S. 1 (1987). … Ohio, 360 U.S. 423, 436-37 (1959) (There is “no question” that a federal claim is properly presented for this court’s juris- dictional purposes if the court below passed on it.).
506 U.S. 866
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.