Documents

Prologue — Lick Fork Marina, Inc. v. Indiana

Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005

American National Bank & Trust Co., 78 Il. 2d 353, 362, 399 N.E.2d 1295, 1299, 35 Ill. Dec. 767 (1980) ..... TENG pera ban are EN eae Oras 17 Olson v. United States, 292 U.S. 246, 255, 78 L. … Pacard, BP Wie Sd Ce hes 1, 7, 8, 18, 19, 24, 25 Warner/Elektra/Atlantic Corp. v. County of DuPage, (CA7 ILL) 991 F 2d 1280, reh, en banc, den. (CA7 ILL) 1993°US Apo.

Brief for the Petitioner in Reply — Shaw Warehouse Co. v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Petitioner in Reply · 1963

Brucke ‘. 399 US. 579 (1998) 4 US. v. Otley, 34 F. … AF 18384 622 A/1C(P) * Honorable Sir: The above was given a discharge under other than honor- able conditions, DDForm 258AF, on November 24, 1956, by reason of conviction of Civil Court AFR 39-22(

Petitioners Brief — Butler v. McKey

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1944

* (353) The Supreme Court of California held in that case that this was not a statement of fact, not ‘legal’ evidence, and that the default judgment entered in the case was absolutely void. (353, 399 … Dated, San Francisco, California, January 24, 1944. ‘ ‘THEODORE J. ROCHE, JAMES FARRAHER, ‘THEODORE H. RocHe, Attorneys for Petitioner. GeorGce A. STOCKFLETH, Of Counsel.

Opposition Brief — Latimer v. Stainer, 112 S. Ct. 186 (1991) (No. 91-148)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

STAINER, Respondent C22 399 NO. 91-148 » OFFER OF The Cl Court, US. Ls DB BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI David A. … Birdsong, 679 F.2d 24 (Se Cae Rens oe ee ee ee eee ee Littlefield v. Ft.

Opposition — Johnson v. J. O. L.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980

Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923). See also, Parham v. J.R., 442 U.S. 584 (1979); Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158 (1944); Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 (1972). … March 24, 1980). All of these cases concern the constitutionality of statutes involving termination of parental rights rather than adoption.

Brief for the United States in Opposition — Virginia National Bank v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1972

App. 93-24). It alternatively held them deductible as taxes (Pet. App.. 24. 27). … Lincolu-Saraugs & Loan Assn., 403 U.S. 345, 399, “the fact that a payment is imposed com-.

Opposition — Giacalone v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979

Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 52 (1970). See also South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364, 367 (1976); Texas v. White, 423 U.S. 67 (1975); Cooper v. California, 386 U.S. 58 (1967). 2. … Petitioner, of course, acknowledges (Pet. 24) that this is the accustomed practice under the Rule.

Opposition Brief — Donlon v. City of Oxnard

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998

Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat.) 264, 399-400 (1821). NIM ALINE Re gre MME NC Med ee APR OS Mem | B. … See Rule 977(b)(1) of the California Rules of Court, quoted in the Petition at 24. IV.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Harry Alexander, Inc. v. Friend

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1955

Ct. 456 . .4, 5, 6, 2a STATUTES: Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers Compen- sation Act of March 24, 1927, 44 Stat. 1424, 33 U.S.C.A. 901, et seq. .. … D.C. 216, 206 F. 2d 435, cert. denied 346 U.S. 399, and cases there cited.”’ The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Riley et al. v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Christopher Everson, Petitioner v. John Armstrong, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 20, 2018

. * 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 CHRISTOPHER EVERSON, 21 PlaintffAppellant, 22 23 No. 16-3381 V. 24 25 26 27 28 JOHN ARMSTRONG, OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, Scorr SEMPLE, COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION … Dyer, 208 F.3d 394, 399 (2d Cir. 2000) (internal quotation marks omitted) "Once a final judgment has been entered on the merits of the case, that judgment will bar any subsequent litigation by the same

Jurisdictional Statement — Pep Boys, Manny, Moe & Jack of Cal., Inc. v. Pyroil Sales Co.

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1936

Rep. 24, 67 L. Ed. 14 ..... STATUTES CITED. ’ Act of January 31, 1928 (28 U., S. C. … Ct. 399, 63 L. Ed. 876; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174, 43 Sup. Ct. 24, 67 L. Ed. 194; ‘Silt v. Moffat Tunnel Imp. Dist., 262 U, Ss. 710, 43 Sup. Ct. 694, 67 L. Ed. 1194. B.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Alex Antonio Bynes, Petitioner v. Florida

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 14, 2026

Const. 24 3a Appellant acknowledges that section 790.23 has been held by this Court not to violate the Second Amendment. See Fleming v. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). He submits, however, that Williams was incorrectly decided and is contrary to the understanding of the Sixth Amendment at the time of the Founding.

Opposition — Association of Massachusetts Consumers, Inc. v. Securities & Exchange Commission

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1976

New England Electric System, 376 F. 2d 399, reversed, 384 U.S. 176 3-4 Securities and Exchange Commission v. … App. 7, 52-53). 384 U.S. 176, reversing 346 F. 2d 399 (C.A. 1), and was re- affirmed in Securities and Exchange Commission v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Brace v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995

FCC, 24 F.3d 1441 (D.C. RR cai ial g wn ge bl e's bos @ va 3 18 E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Train, 430 U.S. ER CRA REE ris ee a eee a ee oe 12 Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. … FCC, 24 F.3d 1441, 1445 (D.C. Cir. 1994) (construing statute to defeat administrative order that would give rise to takings).

Jurisdictional Statement — Frank v. Maryland

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1959

Baltimore City Code (1950 Edition), Article 12, See: | RRS Me Ri ateerielsaicone eek Rita oer ON ese OPM i a OI Nre a Charter of Public Local Laws of Baltimore City | (1949 Edition), Section 6 (5), (11),'(24 … Laws of Maryland, 1953, Chapter 676. 2..0...00..00..000.... | Laws of Maryland, 1957, Chapter 399, ‘Section 4 ........ ‘United States Code, Title 28, Section 1257(2) ............

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Rose v. Mount Sinai Medical Center (No. 09-620)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2009

V Williams v Florida 399 U.S. 78, 80, n.5 1970...... 13 Houssami v Nofal, 578 So. 2d 495, 497 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) COURT RULES Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030 (2) ...19 ARTICLES "Tipping … Lexis 117; 24 Fla. L.

Brief for the United States — Perez v. United States (No. 05-596)

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 2005

Roper, 112 S.W.3d 397, 399 (Mo, 2003) (en bane), aff'd, 543 U.S. 551 (2005)). … Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Virginia v. Moore

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

Rodriguez, 854 P.2d 399 (Or. 1993)....... 8 Pasiewicz v. Lake County Forest Preserve, a EE ED Sic ce ccccosoncecsceves 12 Street v. Surdyka, 492 F.2d 368 (CA4 1974) ....... 12 United States v. … Rodriguez, 854 P.2d 399, 409 (Or. 1993) (holding that even if an arrest were invalid under the Oregon Constitution, “[blecause the arrest in this case did not violate the Fourth Amendment, the guns

Petition — ZITKO v. UNITED STATES (No. 77-622)

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977

Tyler, 399 Mich. 564, 250 N.W. 2d 467 ESS Ea ae er er eee See 15 See v. City of Seattle, 387 US 541 (1967) ........,.. 11, 13, 14, 15 Spinelli v. … Tyler, 399 Mich. 564, 250 N.W. 2nd 467 (1977 That case involved an administrative fire investigation statute and searches made pursuant thereto with a search warrant.

Respondents Brief — Afanzi v. Holder, (2008) (No. 906)

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2008

Dec. 1 (Att’y Gen. 2009) ......... 6, 10, 14, 16 24 1. & N. Dec. 710 (Att’y Gen.), vacated, 251. & N. Dec. 1 (Att’y Gen. 2009)................ 6 Dakane v. … United States Att’y Gen., 399 F.3d 1269 ee ce hed en banks 6 ue oh oO 8b wee 13 Denko v. INS, 351 F.3d 717 (6th Cir. 2003) ............ 13 Fadiga v.