Documents

Opposition Brief — Outboard Marine Corp. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986

II) 1251 et seq., and the federal common law of nuisance, and seeking civil penalties under the Clean Water Act (Pet. … periods (Pet.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lillie Leon, Petitioner v. New York City Department of Education, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 29, 2019

its classrooms are not air conditioned. … (citing Restoration Act § 1; Hernandez v. Kaisman, 103 A.D.3d 106 (1st Dep't 2012)).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ryan v. United States (No. 08-422)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2009

During that same period, eight certiorari petitions were filed by the Air Force Appellate Defense Division (Lovett, Jenkins, Keyser, Davis, Traum, Moses, Robinson, Phillips), though one, Lovett, was … No sailor or Marine filed a pro se cert petition during that period.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Rochna v. Administrator

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991

5) Is the license-penalty policy “"subst- antive" as the term is defined in the Ad- ministrative Procedure Act and, if so, and it has never been adopted through public notice and comment, on what basis … At the time of said flight you were not qualified to act as pilot in command in Part 135 operations for Cash Air, Inc.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lutsko v. Pennsylvania

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1969

He testified specifically about that case and made a brief general comment which obvious- ly was interpreted as applying to all of the cases. … Air, Ine.

Amicus Curiae Brief — James R. Rudisill, Petitioner v. Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 17, 2023

Instead, they can obtain Post-9/11 benefits by simply drawing on a separate period of service— one that has not previously been credited towards any other GI Bill. … Dept. of Energy, Clean Energy, https://www.energy.gov/clean-energy (last visited Aug. 16, 2023). 6 Office of Nuclear Energy, Advantages and Challenges of Nuclear Energy (Mar. 29, 2021), https://www.energy.gov

Petitioners Brief — Porter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (No. 604)

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1961

Act of August 12, 1935; Act of October 17, 1940; 38 U.S. Code 454; 38 U.S. … S Keep this book smooth and clean.

Appellees Brief — Lower Vein Coal Co. v. Industrial Bd. of Ind.

Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1921

to the escape shaft crosses an air course, entry or other pass- ageway used as an air course, either as an intake or return, the air current shall be conducted by an overcast or under- cast, over … Air shall be forced and circulated around main ev.

Appendix — Scott v. City of Hammond

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1985

Train, 539 F. 2d, at 1009, n. 9.2 21 See, e.g., § 304 (e) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. (Su II) 7604 (e); § 16 (e) of the Deep Water Port Act of 1974, 33 US.C. … 1 Similarly, the Supreme Court, in construing the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §1857, et seq., had held that statutory preemption only (Footnote continued on following page) Q-5 B.

Transcript of Record — United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co.

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1942

(A demonstration was then made. ) Perfectly clean, lar. … The ‘micro-pulverizers are cfeaned period- ically and hard particles of grit which had not been pushed the side of the micro-pulverizer are cleaned out.\ They are cleaned periodically in order to make

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Audubon Imports, LLC, dba Mercedes Benz of Baton Rouge, et al., Petitioners v. Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft (BMW AG), et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 22, 2022

included the coordination of AdBlue tank sizes and refill ranges, as well as the exchange of assumed average AdBlue-consumption for their new diesel passenger car models with SCR-system in the relevant period … The Proceedings Below Plaintiffs allege that Defendants violated § 1 of the Sherman Act in three ways.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kasharian v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2010

under the Clean Water Act may be more stringent than required by federal law. … App. 7 (4) Within 30 days of receipt of the Adminis- trator’s comments, the State will finalize the annual report, incorporating and/or responding to the Ad- ministrator’s comments, and transmit the

Amicus Brief — United States v. Park

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1975

Records should be retained for a period of time that exceeds the shelf life of the product, except that they need not be retained more than 2 years. … (3) Remove all insecure jewelry and, during periods where food is manipulated by hand, remove from hands any jewelry that cannot be adequately sanitized.

Reply Brief — NSO Group Technologies Limited, et al., Petitioners v. WhatsApp Inc., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 16, 2022

Period.” App. 12. … Midwest Air Traffic Control Serv., Inc. v. Badilla, No. 21-867 (U.S.

Reply Brief — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2000

During this same period, settling defendants who were parties to consent decrees in seventy-eight Clean Water Act citizen suits — and who faced or paid such penalties — agreed to fund at least $61 million … No. 228, 101st Cong., Ist Sess. 373 (1989), reprinted in 1990 U.S.C.C.A.N. 3386, 3756 (stating that, in citizen suits under the Clean Air Act, assessment of civil penalties for violations *** [is] necessary

Petition for Rehearing — Federal Power Commission v. Southern California Edison Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · 1964

power,, the =e case involy the interests of more than one state becapse of the two different out-of-state: gas supplies; for that | reason ‘the _matter was beyond state regulatory control, and: comments … Me —" CERTIFIOaTE setae by certify that on March 23, 1964 I served edpies % _ of the Petition for Rehearing in the above-captioned mat- .- tere~“upon the: following parties by first-class mail (air

Opposition — Ernst v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1984

Act, USL. … However, in DelCostello the Court effectively overruled Mitchell and held that the six (6)-month period of limitations provided in section 10(b) of ihe Nationa] Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160(

Opposition Brief — SkyWest, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Andrea Hirst, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 24, 2019

They clean planes between trips, assist with wheelchairs, and wait out any delays before or between flights. … The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 (ADA) prohibits states from enforcing any law “related to a price, route, or service of an air carrier.” 49 U.S.C. §41713(b).

Respondents Brief — Federal Communications Commission, et al., Petitioners v. Consumers' Research, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Feb 11, 2025

The Clean Air Act instructed the EPA Administrator to set national ambient air quality standards, but those standards “did not put any business or individual at direct risk of any penalty, criminal or … Whitman itself explained that “[i]t is to the States that the [Clean Air Act] assigns initial and primary responsibility for deciding what emissions reductions will be required from which sources.” 531

Petition for Rehearing — Caudle v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · 1958

In the politically superheated air of St. Louis adverse publicity concerning defendants was circulated by all the organs of mass communication. … have im- paired his judgment to some degree on one day or another during that period. . .”’