Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.56s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cody v. Hillard
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988
The freezer is infre- quently cleaned and is overloaded with food items. Dr. … Ventilation systems in the upholstery shop have been repaired and regular cleaning and replacement schedules have been established for all air filters.
485 U.S. 906Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Minnesota Sands, LLC, Petitioner v. County of Winona, Minnesota
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 1, 2020
R. 4410.1600 (public comment period). … Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR)- Wetland Conservation Act. Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)- Section 401 Certification; Water Quality, and Air Quality Regulations.
Supreme Court brief · Response to application from respondents Nebraska, et al. · Nov 23, 2022
See Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 322 (2014). … Ct. 32 1891, 1913 (2020) (cleaned up).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2024
Whatever the scope of the Clean Air Act’s venue provision in the abstract—a question on which amici take no view—the precise venue question here can be answered by recognizing that there is no regional … It falls in the heartland of the desired uniformity in implementation that Congress was trying to protect through the Clean Air Act’s venue provision. 14 C.
Appendix — American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1977
Federal Aviation Act Sec. 1002(g) ...... ————— 1a 1——K Za Administrative Procedure Act 11 T Ree 3a Re © ens 6a Judgment of Court of Appeals 6a Order of Court of Appeals Denying Rehearing .. 8a … Administrative Procedure Act [Chapter 5 of Title 5, USL.) 4553.
434 U.S. 820Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Colkitt v. GFL Advantage Fund, Ltd.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002
Securities Act of 1933, 15 USA … As described above, it concluded that American Standard plainly had acted with the intent to raise the price of Air Brake stock by deceiving 67a District Court Memorandum and Order - 7/17/00 investors
536 U.S. 923Petitioners Brief — New York Central R. Co. v. Ambrose
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1930
The majority of the bins were self cleaning, and it very rarely happened that men were sent in to clean them (R., p. 30, fol. 34). … Employers’ Liability Act, negligence must be established against defendant, otherwise there can be no recovery. Seaboard Air Line R. Co. vs. Horten, 233 U. S., p. 492; Missouri Pacific R. R.
280 U.S. 486Amicus Curiae Brief — American Mining Congress v. Thomas
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
The Clean Water Act requires limits to be based on the best technology achievable, taking certain factors into consideration. … comment period.
479 U.S. 814Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ti-Coating, Inc. v. Schwarzkopf Development Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987
as the period June 1 _ to November 1, 1982. … Ohlsson’s present comments are directly contrary to the comments Ohlsson made during its own ex parte prosecu- tion.
484 U.S. 853Supreme Court brief · Response to application from respondents Nebraska, et al. · Nov 23, 2022
See Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 322 (2014). … Ct. 32 1891, 1913 (2020) (cleaned up).
Reply Brief — E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1976
Com- paring the unique language of Section 211 to the other operative sections of the Clean Air Act, the dissent con- cluded that the statute does not permit regulatory action based on speculation … Respondent had not accorded the required administrative due process because the final regulations were promulgated without giving Petitioners or other interested parties the opportunity for meaningful comment
426 U.S. 941Appendices — Virginia v. Maryland
Supreme Court brief · Appendices · 2003
e = It was issued without requisite notice to the District of Columbia, contrary to sections 401, 402, 404, and 502(3) of the Clean Water Act.“ D. … Permit #960017 violates due process because: e Permit #960017 was issued without statutory authoriza- tion; in contravention of NEPA, the Clean Water Act, the Rivers and Harbors Act, the Coastal Zone
540 U.S. 56Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1970
He gave Pituitrin to contract her uterus “and I noticed that the uterine wall was not clean. … He stated he did not perforate the uterus but went “in to clean up the uterus,” not knowing it had been perforated.
398 U.S. 938Transcript of Record — Frank v. Maryland
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1959
p ‘of preventing..air pollution. … ~ doned cesspool shall be emptied, cleaned, disinfected, and perma- ea nently filled with clean fresh earth; provided, however, that clean.
359 U.S. 360Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 20, 2025
Air Regulatory Grp. v. … Ass’ns Clean Air Project v. EPA, 752 F.3d 999, 1005 (D.C. Cir. 2014). To satisfy these requirements, Plaintiff provides affidavits from three members—Brian Buchanan, D.
Transcript of Record — Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1943
The ‘Air Bleaching Process’? consists of heating . … If plaintiff is entitled to recover for said taxes as- sessed and collected during the aforesaid period under Section 602% of Title IV of the Revenue Act of 1934 and under Seetion 702 of Title V of
320 U.S. 422Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Albuquerque v. Browner
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
, 42 U.S.C. § 300j-11(b)(1); the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7601(d)(2); the Surface Mining Control and Recla- mation Act, 30 U.S.C. § 1235(k); and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation … THE CLEAN WATER ACT CLEARLY AND UN- AMBIGUOUSLY PROHIBITS INDIAN TRIBES FROM ADOPTING WATER QUALITY STAN- DARDS WHICH ARE MORE STRINGENT THAN FEDERAL MINIMUM STANDARDS.
522 U.S. 965Opposition — Tennessee Water Quality Control Board v. Tennessee Valley Authority
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1984
Whether the waiver of sovereign immunity contained in Section 313 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. (Supp. … This interpretation of the opinion is consistent with the court's later comment that the State also has authority under Section 208 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1288, to regulate pollution (Pet.
466 U.S. 937Reply Brief — Hallstrom v. Tillamook County
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1989
The purpose of the notice provision is to. 7 give time to act. If no action is taken, then the citizens should proceed to protect the environment. … As Sen- ator Hart observed concerning citizen suits to enforce the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7604: First of all, it should be noted that the bill makes no provision for damages to the individual.
489 U.S. 1077Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Serv-Air, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1968
The returning strikers had been members of eight dis- tinct crews prior to their September 2 walkout, excepting only Kuberskey and Ming, assigned to the Gear Box Room, and Gooch to the Cleaning Room … RECOMMENDED ORDER Upon the entire record in this case, and pursuant to Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, I recommend®® that Serv-Air, Inc., its officers, agents, successors
393 U.S. 840
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.