Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.25s
Appendix — Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1965
The acts of Plaintiff complained of deprived De- fendant of profitable business Defendant would otherwise have had throughout the period running from shortly after the Defendant was organized in 1946 … the Sherman Act.
382 U.S. 172Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1893
the parts that should be periodically cleaned, Q. … ~ Keep the glass globes clean.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bellows v. Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991
5) Is the license-penalty policy "subst- antive" as the term is defined in the Ad- ministrative Procedure Act and, if so, and it has never been adopted through public notice and comment, on what basis … , or air agency, and may re-examine any civil air- man.
502 U.S. 910Transcript of Record — Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1943
The ‘Air Bleaching Process’? consists of heating . … If plaintiff is entitled to recover for said taxes as- sessed and collected during the aforesaid period under Section 602% of Title IV of the Revenue Act of 1934 and under Seetion 702 of Title V of
320 U.S. 422Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mary Ann German, Petitioner v. South Carolina
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 26, 2023
Roger put his hands in the air.. , R. 429. Mary saw the man pointing the gun at Roger and "was terrified." R. 473-76. … The Lack of Grace Periods in Jurisdictions Other than South Carolina South Carolina's approach in German gives a grace period to the police.
Record and brief — Los Angeles County Flood Control Dist. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 2013
The Clean Water Act and NPDES Per- mit The Clean Water Act is the nation’s primary water-pollution-control law. … The Clean Water Act and NPDES Permit The Clean Water Act is the nation’s primary water-pollution-control law.
568 U.S. 78Opposition Brief — Eastern Shoshone Tribe, Petitioner v. Wyoming, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · May 18, 2018
and regulations—Continued: Page Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. ..................................... 6 42 U.S.C. 7405 .................................................................... 8 42 … In 1990, Congress amended the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., to permit the U.S.
Opposition Brief — Northern Arapaho Tribe, et al., Petitioners v. Wyoming, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · May 18, 2018
and regulations—Continued: Page Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. ..................................... 6 42 U.S.C. 7405 .................................................................... 8 42 … In 1990, Congress amended the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., to permit the U.S.
Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Texas Water Conservation Ass'n v. Department of the Interior
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1992
Quality Improvement Act of 1970, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4371 et seqg.), sec. 309 of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7609, and E.O. 11514 (Mar. 5, 1970, as amended by E.O. 11991, May 24, 1977 … Part 1508 (1986) PART 1508:--TERMINOLOGY AND INDEX AUTHORITY: NEPA, the Environmental Quality Improvement Act of 1970, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4371 et seq.), sec. 309 of the Clean Air Act, as amended
506 U.S. 823Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Barnes v. North Carolina
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993
He sent James Overby to the Winn residence to get an air compressor to inflate the tires. When Mr. … It also does not show the detective was not acting in good faith as defined in N.C.G.S. Section 15A-978(a).
510 U.S. 946Petition — Neville v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1975
Seven “clean” trucks were legally obtained by Neville—one purchased new through an accomplice, the other six in wrecked condition. … The court of ——, asst rE: not comment on the charge or otherwise require a definition of ‘‘major parts’’ as part of the jury charge. United States v.
423 U.S. 925Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kaliardos v. General Motors Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995
Linde Air Products Co., 339 U.S. 605; 85 USPQ 328 (1950). … It will air dry in 5-10 minutes at room temperature.
514 U.S. 1110Reply Brief — Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Illumina, Inc., et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 4, 2021
Respondents’ vague warning that reversing the panel majority’s ruling would “cast a cloud of uncertainty” over 2 patents on “purifying water” and “cleaning air” (Opp. 17) rings hollow. … Step two of the Alice test also refutes Respondents’ warning that application of the Myriad principle will “cast a cloud of uncertainty over” patents on processes like purifying water or cleaning air.
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1973
See, e.g., Citizens for Clean Air, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers, United States Army, S.D.N.Y., 349 F.Supp. 696, 708 (1972). … We also heard testimony based upon a preliminary draft of Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Office of Air Programs Publication No. AP-42, U.S.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2024
Whatever the scope of the Clean Air Act’s venue provision in the abstract—a question on which amici take no view—the precise venue question here can be answered by recognizing that there is no regional … It falls in the heartland of the desired uniformity in implementation that Congress was trying to protect through the Clean Air Act’s venue provision. 14 C.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 10, 2021
(cleaned up). 18 Chevron thus always requires courts to interpret the statute de novo. … The Clean Air Act provisions at issue there required permits for major emitters of “any air pollutant,” and the EPA had issued a regulation defining this term to include greenhouse gases. Id. at 316.
Reply Brief — Satellite Broadcasting & Communications Ass'n of America v. Ringer
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1994
National Resources Defense Council instead attempted to analogize the Clean Air Act scheme at issue in the case with the “NSPS” regulations at issue in ASARCO Inc. v. EPA, 578 F.2d 319 (D.C. … Circuit specifically held that the “bubble” concept was to be evaluated separately for each statutory scheme under the Clean Air Act. Alabama Power Co. Vv. Costle, 636 F.2d 323, 401-02 (D.C.
513 U.S. 823Petition — First Arabian Corp. v. Pharaon
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983
Eagerton v Valuations, Inc, 698 F.2d 1115, 1118-19 (11th Cir. 1983); Waste Systems, Inc. v Clean Land Air Water Corp.,, 683 F.2d 927, 930-31 (Sth Cir. 1982); Joiner v Diamond 11 M. … See also Waste Systems, Inc. v Clean Land Air Water Corp., 683 F.2d 927, 930 (5th Cir, 1982). (5th Cir, 1982).
464 U.S. 892Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Unity Real Estate Co. v. Hudson
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999
Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711 (1987) .............0....0ee 26 Railroad Retirement Board v. Alton R.R. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711 (1987). See 950 F.2d at 779-85. The Court should grant review to resolve the circuit conflict between the decision below and King. 3.
528 U.S. 963Brief — Donte Parrish, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief · Mar 28, 2025
United States, 556 U.S. 303, 314 (2009) (cleaned up). … HollyFrontier interpreted the word “extension” in a specific context—an administrative agency’s denial of a small-refinery hardship exemption under the Clean Air Act.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.