Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

1.07s

  • Appendix — Accuracy in Media, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1976

    Reference to the legislative history of the "* 47 U.S.C. §399 (Supp. … Schott, 29 F.C.C.2d 35, 36 (1971) (in which the Commission expressly refused to assert jurisdiction over networks). 24 See United States v.

    425 U.S. 934
  • Appendix — Liberty Loan Corp. v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1974

    The vice, if any, was in the method of allocating this charge (for income expense) among the 399 individual members of the group. … Eustice, Affiliated Corporations Revisited: Recent Developments Under Sections 482 and 367, 24 Tax L.Rev. 101, 105 (1968).

    419 U.S. 1089
  • Respondents Brief — Quarles v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 914 (2019) (No. 17-778)

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2019

    Ct. 399 (2018) 16 139 S. Ct. 399 (2018) bassin Welch v. United States, 136 S8. Ct. 1257 (2016) 4 Young v. State, 266 S. … Ct. 399, 405 (2018). Under that approach, courts examine the “stat- utory definition!”

  • Opposition Brief — Bencel v. Frost

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1965

    (Pet. 464i, 51, 52; J.A. 339-345, 399- 400.)*- Mickel and Johnson tei in their semua (1) | that the Company would lose business if unionized ; (2) that the Company was able and willing to keep the … | went” would continue to hire its employees ‘‘through gaining unit who had worked for the Company for 30 days or more during the preceding 12 months, or for 45 days or more during the preceding 24

    382 U.S. 831
  • Memorandum — Habig v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1973

    Agent Vandever testified that at approximately 3:30 a.m. on October 24, he crawled through the bushes and then between the two vehicles parked in the Holiday Inn lot and put his nose down close to … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51-52; Carroll y. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 153: see Cady v. Dombrowski, 413 U.S. 433.

    411 U.S. 972
  • Supplemental Brief — Winterthur Reinsurance Corp. of America v. California

    Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1993

    See Winterthur Pet, 23-24. When all is said and done, plain- tiffs are still consumers of primary insurance, and Win- terthur and other reinsurers are stil! sellers only of re- insurance. … VoTH ARNOLD & PORTER 399 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 (212) 715-1000 DouGLAS L. WALD ANNETTE M. LANG ARNOLD & PORTER 1200 New Hampshire Ave., N.W.

    509 U.S. 921
  • Record and brief — Supreme Court Records & Briefs 1935 Full Opinions

    Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1935

    Conmisbioncr | 24 16 " 113 Schuy]ki1] Trust Ca. v. Pennsylvan 3 7 133 American surety Co. v. Electric -Co. 12 5 141 Vutaiineds ve’ Furland , “1 176 Pacific States Co. v. White 5" 189 U.S. v. … Lunsford 399 8». 403 Pacific Tel. Co. v. Tax Comm'n, baa 34 420 Leahy v. State Treasurer Ne 599. "2 422 Bayside Fish Flour Co. Vv. Gentry 2:° 4 “431 Whitfield v. Ohio 377 7 441 Matson Nav.

  • Petitioners Reply Brief — Court House Plaza Co. v. City of Palo Alto

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1983

    Id., at 399-400, 171 Cal.Rptr. at 402. … Dated: October 24, 1983 Respectfully submitted, S & MAN Nlalman J EY P. WIDMAN Attorneys for Petitioner CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) Jeffrey P.

    464 U.S. 935
  • Reply — Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply · 1976

    The significance of this additional seniority for each employee in the class is discussed at length in our brief on the merits at 24-29. … Jd. at 399.

    424 U.S. 747
  • Prologue — Tilton v. Ramirez (No. 05-736)

    Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005

    Brown 399 F.3d 964 (9th Cir. 2005) Rose v. Lundy 455 U.S. 509 (1982) Rummel v. Estelle 445 U.S. 263 (1980) Schriro v. Smith ek. ee 126 S. Ct. 7 (2005) Singleton v. … United States District Court, Central District of California, Denying Certificate of Appealability _ APPENDIX G Judgment of the United States District Court, Central District of California 21 24

  • Brief Amicus Curiaeoo — See v. City of Seattle

    Supreme Court brief · Brief Amicus Curiaeoo · 1967

    Amoebic Dysentery in Chicago, 24 Am. J. ‘Pos. | DDE CE pias se kee ak oc e's ll - D.C. Dept. Licenses & Inspections Rep., ‘‘ Hous- inc CopE EnrorceMEenT’’ (Dec. 24, 1958) ....: 11 Fire Journal. … Department Licenses & Inspections Rep., ‘‘Housing Code Enforcement’’ (Dec. 24, 1958).

    387 U.S. 541
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Michael Swain, Petitioner v. Florida Commission on Offender Review

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 4, 2019

    United States, 383 U.S. 541 (1966).......... 12 10,12,19,22 7,10,19,22,23 17 McKahn -}qq c . v. , Elorida Parole & Probation Commissi’ on. 399 So.2d 476 (Fla. 1 DCA 1981).......... 19 Meachum v. … Florida Parole and Probation Commission 399 So.2d 476, 478 (Fla. lsst DCA 1981); Hardv v.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Virginia House of Delegates, et al., Appellants v. Golden Bethune-Hill, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 15, 2019

    Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ................................................... 10 Miller v. Johnson, 515 U.S. 900 (1995) ............ passim Mobile v. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006), and Section 5, see e.g., Beer v. United States, 425 U.S. 130 (1976), of the VRA.

  • Respondents Opposing Brief — Furnish v. Board of Medical Examiners of California (No. 248)

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Opposing Brief · 1957

    Stats.°1937, Ch. 414) p. 1377, making effective Stats. 1937, Ch. 399, p. 1275.) t No | - . … App. 24-343, 351, 300- P. 2d 35. .

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Gonzalez v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2008

    Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970) ... Peretz v. United States, 501 U.S. 923 (1991) ; United States v. Desir, 273 F.3d 39 (1st Cir. 2001) ee ° a os . . . ° ° . . . o oo - United States v. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 90 (1970). The waiver of such a fundamental right must constitute “the express and intelligent consent of the defendant [to proceed without a jury].”

    553 U.S. 242
  • Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Gunston v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1966

    Rev. 399, 400. … * APPENDIX BO - Opinion i in a Appellate Division, First Department ~ Reported i in 24 A. D. 2d 560."

    385 U.S. 964
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Miladis Salgado, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 17, 2019

    Rev. 399 (2017) ..................................12 Robert O’Harrow Jr., et al., They Fought the Law. Who Won? THE WASH. … Rev. 399, 413 (2017).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cedric Milburn, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 7, 2025

    Cedric Milburn, No. 24-20534, 2025 WL 1894946 (5th Cir. … Neal, 611 F.3d 399, 402 (7th Cir. 2010) (same); United States v. Foster, 575 F.3d 861, 863 (8th Cir. 18 2009) (same); United States v. Jules, 595 F.3d 1239, 1245 (11th Cir. 2010) (same).

  • Petitioners Brief — Broad River Power Co. v. South Carolina Ex Rel. Daniel

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1930

    Comm., 251 U. 8. 396 21-24-53-67 Bryan v. Louisville R. R. Co., 244 Fed. 650......... 45-48 Bullock v. R. R. Comm., 254 U.S. 513.............. 22-27 Charleston-Isle Co. v. … D. 1887, and by an Act entitled ‘An Act to incorporate the Columbia Electric Street and Suburban Railway and Electric Power Company,’ approved December 24, A.

    281 U.S. 537
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cincinnati District Council 51 v. City of Cincinnati

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1974

    New York, 399 U.S. 66 .................- 18 Bell v. United States, 349 U.S. 81 ...............-25- 16 een w. Emete, SPE UD. TOG on occ cccwescceseneses 18 Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. … Culifornia, 386 U.S. 18, 24. On the contrary, it imposed on peti- tioners a burden of demonstrating prejudice which effectively nullifies that constitutional right.

    415 U.S. 994

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.