Documents

Transcript of Record — New York Central R. Co. v. Ambrose

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1930

And he would clean up the bins on that floor? A. It is very rarely they clean up the bins. Q. You just let the grain remain there? A. They are self cleaning, the majority of the bins. Q. … payments or contributions run- ning over the entire period when the contributions would have continued.

Application — National Federation of Independent Business, et al., Applicants v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Application · Dec 17, 2021

The ETS provision, section 6(c)(1), exempts the Secretary from procedural requirements contained in the OSH Act and the Administrative Procedure Act, including those for public notice, comments, and a … Please submit comments related to the Paperwork Act analysis to OSHA in the PRA docket (Docket Number OSHA– 2021–0008).

Amicus Curiae Brief — John L. Sullivan, Tax Commissioner of the State of Connecticut v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1969

. : % : ’ 4) ” Aire "AUTHORITIES CITED | ee , | Sec. 514 of the Soldiers’ and Sailors Civil Relief Act_3, 4,5 The Nebraska Revenue Act of 1967, § 7 7. -2704, BR. … The Nebré ka Salés and Use Tax was imposed at the 2% for the period June 1, 1967, through - ‘January 1, 1969, when it was cut to 2%.

Transcript of Record — In Re McConnell

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1962

Talbott made o mistake and acted indiscreetly in his position as Secretary of the Air Force. It agrees his resignation was quite proper under the circumstances. … Air conditioning shall be installed and maintained in these passenger vehicles, These vehicles shall be maintained in * clean, safe and sanitary condition, Passenger equipment used by Transfer in any

Respondents Brief — Touby v. United States (No. 90-6282)

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1991

3 i senenenmmndenniibsmeseiepseanbnans 3 EEE ERSTE SPAR b SRS ev Owen cnet T ere Sw 3 I a sg naenneennenniente 34 i on iceassenennesiauntionh 37 a linbnnnaieneaeienliin 35 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C … United States, 434 U.S. 275, 285 (1978) (interpreting Clean Air Act § 307(b) (2) ). 37 (1950).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Hughes v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 940 (2018) (No. 17-155)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711 (1987)....................666 24 Planned Parenthood of Se. Pa. v. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air®® to determine the controlling opinion.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Raybestos Products Products Co Co. v. Indiana Department of Environmental Management (No. 09-11)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2009

Two months later, IDEM commented on the proposal and suggested that Raybestos consider a “hot spot” re- moval, in which high-level areas are cleaned to a specified level but the site is not cleaned … IDEM commented on the proposed Technical Memorandum, and Raybestos addressed each of IDEM’s stated concerns, ultimately agreeing to clean all “hot spots” (high levels) to no more than 238 ppm.

Petition — Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

«sca . a0 nketesothuke ess enesaaeeee 28 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, 42 U.S.C., section 7607 (Summ, TBOee ha en Seen rl Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C., section 2058 (1976).. 28 Department … I 1977); Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, § 305, 42 U.S.C. § 7607 (Supp. I 1977). *°In fact, it may apply to formal rulemaking, too.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — The GEO Group, Inc., Petitioner v. Alejandro Menocal, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 13, 2025

GEO staff members assigned these cleaning tasks—which also included cleaning the recreation yard and picking up trash—to detainees on a periodic basis. … GEO must establish that it acted as ICE’s agent in paying VWP class members $1.00 per day during the class period. Yearsley, 309 U.S. at 20-21 (“The action of the agent is the act of the government.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Erik Lindsey Hughes, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 25, 2018

Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711 (1987) ........................ 24 Planned Parenthood of Se. Pa. v. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air 26 to determine the controlling opinion.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Neville v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1975

dram housing, brakes, front end assembly, front springs, leaf springs, air conditioner, frame, tires (Tr. 672-77, 990- 95). … The court of appeals, however, did not comment on the charge or otherwise require a definition of “‘major parts’’ as part of the jury charge. United States v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Animal Legal Defense Fund, et al., Petitioners v. Department of Homeland Security, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 23, 2018

And in Whitman, 531 U.S. at 465, 473—where the Clean Air Act delegated authority to the EPA to promulgate ambient air quality standards “to protect the public health”—the statute directed the EPA to use … . § 1531 et seq.)), the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.), and the Clean Water Act, (33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.)); • The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (Pub. L.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dobrovolny v. Moore

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998

means. 15a Appendix B The clean Environment Act initiative sponsors presented their initiative petitions to Allen J. … Beermann entered and order in which he refused to place the Clean Environment Act on the November general election ballot.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tonka Corp. v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994

Acting under the Minnesota Superfund Act, Minn. Stat. … Floyd Weinzierl, a paint department employee, testified that when cleaning out the degreasers, he would let them air out first because, "You couldn’t breathe in there otherwise.

Petition — AMF, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979

Chrysler developed its own “Clean Air Package” (CAP), and the other three manufacturers adopted an air injection system operated with an air pump supplied by GM. … for any subsequent acts committed by defendant within the limitations period because those acts do not injure plaintiff.”

Respondents Brief — Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2002

Ct. 903 (2001), the respondents, a group repre- senting trucking companies, argued that under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401, et seq., the EPA had the author- ity to consider the cost of implementation … The Court found that while the Clean Air Act, was “to some extent ambiguous,” the agency’s inter- pretation of the statute went “beyond the limits of what is ambiguous and contradict[ed] what . . .

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — General Motors Corp. v. Skelton

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989

See, e.g., 15 U.S.C. $§ 78i(e), 78r(a) (Se- curities Exchange Act of 1934); 15 U.S.C. § 1640‘a) (Truth in Lending Act); 15 U.S.C. § 2310(d) (2) (Mag- nuson-Moss Act); 42 U.S.C. § 7604(d) (Clean Air … In Delaware Valley, a group of citizens had prevailed in an action under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7410.

Petition — Hayes International Corp. v. McLucas

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1975

sustaining engi- neering and related support services contracts on the KOC-135 fleet, acting as the ‘‘engineering arm’’ of the Air Force for the fleet. … In March, 1971, the Secretary of the Air Force, acting through the United States Department of the Air Force, Air Force Logistics Command, Headquarters Oklahoma City Air Materiel Area, Tinker Air Force

Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Terminal Railroad v. Pashea

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1943

Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U. S. C. A., See. 51, Act of April 22, 1908, Sec. 1, 35 Stat. 35........ 2 Encyclopedias Cited. AS, Os Oe ee, 34 20 Dik, Gil, Wee. … (R. p. 69); ‘*I was knocked clean clear of the coupler and also the brake shaft’? (R. p. 74).

Amicus Curiae Brief — SD Warren Co. v. Maine Bd. of Environmental Protection

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

comprehensive proposed amendments to the Clean Water Act. … Finally, section 404 of the Clean Water Act, which concerns “discharge[s] of Gredged or fill material,” 33 U.S.C. § 1344, is triggered only when “dredged or fill material,” which the Clean Water Act