Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.13s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Batson v. Kentucky
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970); Taylor, 419 U.S. at 528. … If this Court makes it clear that use of the peremptory challenge to practice -24- racial discrimination will not be tolerated, the frequency with which a trial court will be required to distinguish
476 U.S. 79Amicus Curiae Brief — National Ass'n of Broadcasters v. Quincy Cable TV, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
FCC, 399 F.2d 65 (1968). And in United States v. … (App., m. 24a n.24.) These statements are contradicted by the facts noted above.
476 U.S. 1169Motion — Green v. Amerada Hess Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1980
(R. 191) On July 24, 1975, Green's employment with Amerada Hess was terminated for cause!, (R. 186, 192). … New Haven Inclu- sion Cases, 399 U.S. 392, 450, n.66 (1970). Therefore, this Court should not review this concurrent finding of fact.
449 U.S. 952BRIEF OPPOSSING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL — Kirschke v. Houston
Supreme Court brief · BRIEF OPPOSSING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL · 1960
Appellants stated in open Court ~ . a — ee - » =< “ 24 that they would not an.end their petition. … City of West University Place, 141 Tex. 608, 17545.W. 2d 396, 398, 399, (1943). 2 ae The same rule of law is upheld by the Supreme Courts of sister states.
364 U.S. 474Petitioners Brief — Thomas v. El Dorado Irrigation District
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1942
Waco Dev, Co., 87 Fed. (2d) 395, 399; John Hancock Mutual Life Inswrance Co. v, Bartels, 308 U. S. 180, 60 S. Ct. 221; American United Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. … Supp. 399. See Rule 52, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
317 U.S. 660Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Stanley Aron Cavienss, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 18, 2021
Docket Entries, No. 3:16-cr-00114-6 (VAB), ECF Nos. 379, 389, 396, 399, 419. Before the sentencing hearing, the Court considered the parties’ filings and the U.S. … Bank ofAm., 723 F.3d 399, 403 (2d Cir. 2013) (quoting Triestman, 470 F.3d at 474). III. DISCUSSION 6 Case 3:18-cv-01920-VAB Document 7 Filed 01/15/20 Page 7 of 9 Mr.
Reply Brief — Mike Finnin Motors, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. United States, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 16, 2021
United States, 282 U.S. 399 (1931) ............................................. 1 Loretto v. … (Pet.24). B. The Government Cannot Be Excused from Its Decision Not to Oppose the Direct Takings Claim.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Shawn Travis Paschal, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 10, 2025
Cotton, 399 F.3d 913 (8th Cir. 2005) .................................................................................. 10 United States v. … Paschal, No. 24-11112, 2025 WL 1927682 (5th Cir. July 14, 2025)(unpublished). It is reprinted in Appendix A to this Petition.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 9, 2026
NO. 24-889 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ______________ HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC., ET AL., Petitioners, V. … Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399, 406-407 (2012) ..................................8 eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 547 U.S. 388, 391-392 (2006) ..................................9 Festo Corp. v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Coinbase, Inc., Petitioner v. Abraham Bielski
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 27, 2023
, 2016 Date 821 Fed.Appx. 753 July 24, 2020 816 F.3d 587 Citation 2a Case Name The Thomas KinKade Co. v. … Applicable 669 Fed.Appx. 487 October 13, 2016 668 Fed.Appx 777 Reversed Reversed 473 Fed.Appx. 793 June 12, 2012 859 Fed.Appx. 31 Affirmed Not Applicable 772 Fed.Appx. 569 June 28, 2019 855 Fed.Appx. 399
Petitioners Reply Brief — Smith v. Yeager
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1968
IN THE Supreme Court of the United States OCTOBER TERM, 1968 3 . » No. 399 . Epear H. SMITH, JR., Petitioner, Vv. “Howarp YEAGER, WARDEN, Respondent. … (Pet. 24-25). “6. That Lema never personally consented to the . alleged ‘‘waiver’’.. (Pet. 23).
393 U.S. 122Petition for Writ of Certiorari — First National City Bank v. Gillilland
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1958
U.S. 24 (1958) ? Order of ng y Sommuctars y- Swan, 329 ‘Cv. S. Tal v. ae, 349 U.S. 331°(1953) - Ralph rv, Cronk, 266 N,°Y. 428 (1934) | Service vr. Dulles, 354 U.S 363 (1957 )\ - Siegel vr. … U hited States, 87 Pus. 399 CE. D. N. YY, 1949) - es aoe Social Sec urity Board r. Nierotko, 3 327.U. S- 358, 369 (1946) ° St: ee Stockyards Co. rv United States, 298° U.S. 38 (1936) Stark v.
358 U.S. 837Reply Brief — Kasi v. Virginia
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1999
See Appendix at 67 (“I don’t find there’s any jurisdiction of a state court to hold a federal official in contempt for failing to respond to a state court’s subpoena”), 362- 385, 399-422. … Moreover, his brief does no more than simply articulate Assignments of Error 2, 7, 16, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 27, 29, 30, 437, 45, 51, and 54 in a completely conclusory manner. (Def.
527 U.S. 1038Opposition Brief — Johnson v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986
+ @24 3 in terms of negligent failure to prevent the assault and battery’ ” (Pet. App. A1l0 (quoting Shearer, slip op. 2-3)).' … United States, 788 F.2d 395, 399-400 (6th Cir. 1986).
479 U.S. 914Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Cordle v. Alabama
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1974
On February 24, 1972, the defendant filed a “Motion to Determine Sanity.” This Motion was also denied on the fol wir g day by Judge Emmet. On April 12, 1972, the Circuit Court appointed Hon. … Alabama, 399 U. S. 1, 90 S.Ct. 1999, 26 L.Ed. 2d. 387 (1970) and his counsel was aware of all the testimony that took place at that time.
419 U.S. 1033Petition for Rehearing — In Re Kevin Ogden, Petitioner
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · Jun 24, 2025
REPONDENTS: TENTION mn KEHEARLNG Case Number: 24-7/75 By: Kein Ooden 44394 "Kevin Ogden Pyro Se Peni ten (ACY “pf [Ve w Me xiCo SoutA Unit: 2A-L- ee P.0.B80K [699% Santa fe, New Mexice §7502- 059 … United States, 354 UL. 394, dt 399 , 100/97 7), See also Will Vv. Unpted Séak CF, 309 US. 90, at 96-97 (1967).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Andrey Bridges, Petitioner v. David W. Gray, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 3, 2020
Dempsey. 261 U.S. 86; 24 Mooney v. Holohan. 294 U.S. 103; 24 Bowen v. Johnston. 306 U.S. 19, 24. 24 Actual Innocence. 24 U.S. v. Friday. D.C. … Marruio. 86 N.M. 399, 524 P.2d 1015, 1019; 24 b) False Imprisonment, where Bridges is unlawfully under detention, whereby he is denied his personal liberty, “Quoting”; Dupler v.
Petitioners Brief — Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1986
McCloud, 259 S.C. 409, 192 S.E.2d 202 (1972); appeal dism’d,413 U.S. 902 (1973). .......... 24, 25, 28 Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947)... passim Hicks v. … Committee for Public Education, 413 U.S. 472, 480 (1973). 24 religious that the Establishment Clause was violated by his participation, even though the program itself was neutral.
474 U.S. 481Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jou v. Argonaut Insurance Insurance Insurance Co Co (No. 07-1173)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007
Pennsylvania, 382 US. 399, 401, 88 S.Ct. 518 (1966); Yick Wo v. … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399, 401, 86 ER a ai nrkdscsdcccesscocese 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 30 Gonzalez v.
Opposition Brief — Gas Spring Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991
R. 24(c). 9 2. a. A strike is an unfair labor practice strike “if an {employer’s}] unfair labor practices had anything to do with causing it.” NLRB v. … Crystal Springs Shirt Corp., 637 F.2d 399, 404 (Sth Cir. 1981). Accord Queen Mary Restaurants Corp. v. NLRB, 560 F.2d 403, 412 (9th Cir. 1977); NLRB v.
498 U.S. 1084
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.