Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.30s
Petition — Andrews v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983
Moore, 423 U.S. 122 (1975). 5.6. United States v. Outler, 659 F.2d 1306 (5th Cir. Sea) 4... ee ee 5 United States v. Roya, 576 F.2d 386 (7th Cir. 1978) United States v. … This Court should also consider the issue for clarification as to the application of its ruling in U.S. v. Moore, 423 U.S. 122 (1975) to the sufficiency of an indictment.
464 U.S. 817Amicus Curiae Brief — Lewis v. Casey
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
Turner, 482 U.S. at 89. … Abbott, 490 U.S. at 407 (quoting Turner, 482 U.S. at 85).
518 U.S. 343Petition — Yarmosh v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977
ESPOSITO, 423 F.Supp 18 U.S.C. … denied, 423 U.S. 842, 96 S.Ct. 74, 46 L.E£d.20 63 (1975); United States v. Bynum, 485 a 490, 495-97 = Cir.
434 U.S. 954Amicus Curiae Brief — South Carolina v. Gathers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
Maryland, 482 U.S. —_, 107 S.Ct. 2529, 96 L.Ed.2d 440 (1987). … Booth, 482 U.S. at __ , 107 S. Ct. at 2529, 96 L.Ed.2d at 448.
490 U.S. 805Petitioners Brief — Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1999
(Emphasis added), 42 U.S.C. § 423. … § 423(d)(1)(A).
526 U.S. 795Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jackson v. Chater
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996
\ Supreme Court, U.S. . … SULLIVAN (1993, ED PA) 1993 U.S. DIST. (Exis 206.) MARTIN V.
519 U.S. 930Opposition — David Orgell, Inc. v. Josiah Wedgwood & Sons, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981
National Screen Service Corp., 517 F.2d 117 (Sth Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 (1976)......c000 5, 6 Program Engineering Inc. v. … National Screen Service Corp., 517 F.2d 117, 128 (Sth Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 (1976); Braun v. Berenson, 432 F.2d 538, 543 (Sth Cir. 1970), Harold Friedman, Inc. v.
452 U.S. 914Opposition Brief — Liberty Loan Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1974
P., and that its construction of Section 482 of the Code conflicts with Eisner v. Macumber, 252 U.S. 189. Neither argument has merit. a. … First Security Bank of Utah, 405 U.S. 394, 400.
419 U.S. 1089Opinion — Sorrells v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1932
S. 420, 423; Price v. United States, 165 U. 8. 311, 315; Bates v. United States, 10 Fed. 92, 94; Note. p. 97. United States v. Reisenweber, 288 Fed. 520, 526; Aultman v. … Kirby, 7 Wall. 482, the case arose under the Act of Congress of March 3, 1825 (4 Stat. 104) providing for the conviction of any person who ‘‘shall knowingly and willfully obstruct or retard the passage
287 U.S. 435Opposition Brief — Renee D. Bell, Petitioner v. Orlando Health, Inc., dba Winnie Palmer Hospital
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Nov 30, 2018
Pierce, III Florida Bar No. 270921 Mateer &Harbert, P.A. 225 East Robinson Street Suite 600 Orlando, FL 32801 (407)425-9044 (407)423-2016 (pierce@mateerharbert.com Counsel for Respondent Orlando Health … In Fu~.man v U.S., 720 F.2d 263, 264, (2d Cir. 1983), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals states that there is no requirement in law that a federal appellate court's decision be accompanied by a written
Petition — Irish People, Inc. v. Smith
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983
Hermansdorfer, 423 U.S. 336 Se censeocdoeeeseeool Traher v. DeHavilland Aircraft of Canada, Ltd., 294 F.2d 229 (1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 954 (1962)...36 United Mine Workers v. … Hermansdorfer, 423 U.S. 336 (1976); Hanna v. Plumer, 380 U.S. 460 (1965). This is not simply a conflict concerning a fine point of state law; instead, the D.C.
459 U.S. 1172Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Garcia v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999
Russell, 411 U.S. 423, 428, 93 S.Ct. 1637, 36 L.Ed.2d 366 (1973) (“[In Sor- rells,| Mr. … Russell, 411 U.S. 423, 435, 93 S.Ct. 1637, 36 L.Ed.2d 366 (1973) (emphasis added); see also, Ronald J.
528 U.S. 987Petitioners Brief — Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western NY
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1997
Hill, 482 U.S. 451, 462 n.11 (1987). … Hill, 482 U.S. 451 (1987); Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940).
519 U.S. 357Respondents Brief — Sandoval v. California
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1993
Ct. at 482 & n.4; see Holland, 348 U.S. at 140. B. CALJIC 2.90 is Constitutional. 1. … McGuire, 112 S.Ct. ut 482 n.4.
510 U.S. 942Brief of Respondent in Opposition to Grandting of Writ of Certiorari — Cooper v. California
Supreme Court brief · Brief of Respondent in Opposition to Grandting of Writ of Certiorari · 1958
Spree Got itr <Octoaza Tram, 1958 i "No. 423 a ? * oe. Tue Peortz oF THE State or CALIFoRNIA, . … California, 342 U.S. 165, 96 L. Ed. 183, 72 S. Ct. 205. .Moreover, thé search:and seizure in question was not unreasonable.
358 U.S. 894Amicus Curiae Brief — Virginia v. Black
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476 (1993), and R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377 (1992). … Paul, 505 U.S. at 388.
538 U.S. 343Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Couture v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1964
Mpeava as defined in- Hoffman v. sy ama er: U.S. 335° p ee s + . ¥! … Gilbert, 330 pate U.S. 501; Bush v. United Air-Lines, Inc., 148 F. Supp. 104, . re \\ 105 (S. D. N.
379 U.S. 853Opposition Brief — Foster v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986
denied, 320 U.S. 794 (1943). … . § 482 where that corporation could not have received that income as a matter of law.” United States v. Basye, 410 U.S. 441, 453 n.13 (1973).
474 U.S. 1055Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1983
Francis, 482 U.S. 410 26 „ Industry Association v. Boyd, 409 F. 2d :.. — 88 17 * Transportation, Inc. v. … Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., supra, 423 U.S. at 329-331.
463 U.S. 29Amicus Curiae Brief — Pennsylvania v. Chmiel
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Chmiel, 738 A.2d at 423. … Chmiel, 738 A.2d at 423.
528 U.S. 1131
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.