Documents

Petitioner for ReHearing — Electri-Flex Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court brief · Petitioner for ReHearing · 1980

Bily approached Lopez, told him to clean the screen and Lopez said that it had already been cleaned. … Bax) and (1) of the Act, we find it necessary to correct the Administrative Law J udge’s factual discussion of one of the cases cited in support of his finding and to comment on his legal interpretation

Jurisdictional Statement — Spalding Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co. v. Department of Revenue

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1969

A copy of this Order is, set forth in Appendix B. } , Appellant's Notice of Appeal to this court was filed in the Court of Appeals of Kentucky on March 26, 1969, within the statutorily prescribed period … The act grants a broad exemption én sales made of “thachinery for new and expanded industry, ** Ken- tucky Revised Statutes 139. 480(8), but in a separate section thé act undertakes to classify industries

Transcript of Record — Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. Groeger

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1925

The next is, “Clean out oil cups on air pumps.” Those are defects I found with that engine that developed on that run. The condition of the injectors on that run was good. … Clean out flues, R. S. Lowell. 2. Refill all grease cellars on left side, C. Reynolds. 3. Tighten left steam chest cover, it leaks steam bad, Guthrie. 4. Clean out oil cups on air pumps, Cropp.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Albanese v. N. v. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1966

Though the hilos were in good condition, they necessarily ~ emitted carbon monoxide fumes which affected the air in. the lower hold. … Petitioner collapsed on part of the cargo. aera he and the other holdmen attempted to leave the air-contaminated lower hold.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Nebrasks v. Parker, 136 S. Ct. 27 (2015) (No. 14-1406)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

With respect to the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., in Oklahoma Dept. of Environmental Quality v. E.P.A., 740 F.3d 185 (D.C. Cir. 2014), the U.S. … Ok “[jjurisdiction to implement the Clean Air Act lies initially in either a state or an Indian tribe.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Moon v. North Idaho Farmers Ass'n

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005

Farmers claim federal law (the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. … Specifically, farmers claim the federal Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §$ 7401 to 7671q, preempt citizens’ common law claims. Jd. p. 8.

Joint Appendix Vol I — Kelly v. South Carolina

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix Vol I · 2002

TWO LADIES THERE TO CLEAN UP. THEY CUT OUT THE LIGHTS ABOUT TEN AND THEN THEY HAVE TO CLEAN UP FOR AWHILE. … A PERIODICALLY, SIR. WE DO CELL CHECKS ALMOST ON A MONTHLY BASIS.

Reply Brief — Grine v. Coombs

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2002

Fy sevciuninteadnesaticnns cucibabanatekcanc wt tae Delaware Valley Citizens Council for Clean Air v. Lavin, S52 FD SOG CO Ce, BY i cssinticshiiicccssinleossicecsnes 4 Ebrahimi v. … As the appellate court unambiguously stated in Delaware Valley, (Delaware Valley Citizens Council for Clean Air v.

Appendix — Pronsolino v. Nastri

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2003

Houck, The Clean Water Act TMDL Program: Law, Policy, and Implementation 49-56 (1999) (“The Clean Water Act TMDL Program’’)(same). … The 1987 Amendment and Section 319 In 1987, Congress amended Section 319 to the Clean Water Act.

Petitioners Brief — Quinn v. Muscare

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1976

The face shall be clean-shaven, except that a non-eccentric mustache is permissible. … As for beards, the Jacksonville regulation specified: “Members shall be clean shaven upon reporting for duty and shall remain clean shaven throughout their tour of duty.

Appendices — United Food & Commercial Workers International Union v. Poland Spring Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Appendices · 2003

acts—although literally disobedience—do not. … Thus, the Union suggests, the grievant limited his comment to the somewhat ambiguous comment, “My crawling days are over,” and so forth. This argument is not persuasive.

Brief of Bethlehem Steel Co in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Raidy v. United States (No. 931)

Supreme Court brief · Brief of Bethlehem Steel Co in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1957

In fact during a large part of the contract period there were no plates at all on the catwalk (R. 3a, 39). … Indeed it pointed out that at the very time he was injured members of the crew were similarly engaged in cleaning the adjoining tanks.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ciro Cruz-Lopez, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 6, 2020

Sosa, 387 F.3d 131 (2d Cir. 2004) ............................................................. 15 vii Utility Air Regulatory Group v. … Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) of 1996, § 309(c)(2), Pub. L.

Reply Brief — Wyman v. James

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1971

San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523 (1967) ........... 4 “Clean Air Act. Eliz. 2c H Sec 100 (1955)............... 4 | Food Drug Act. … H Sect 100/5); Water Act 1948 11 & 126 c. 42 Section 48 (3) Clean Air Act, 1956, 4 & 5 Eliz. 2, c. 52 Section 31 and 32.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Banc of America Securities LLC, et al., Petitioners v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 1, 2025

period.” … Bouaphakeo, 577 U.S. 442, 453 (2016) (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

James, The Clean Water Act in Peril, House Committee on Transportation (Oct. 18, 2002), available at http://www. … No. 87- 88, 75 Stat. 204; Water Quality Act of 1965, Pub. L. 89-234, 79 Stat. 903; Clean Water Restoration Act of 1966, Pub. L.

Reply Brief — United States v. Texas, 136 S. Ct. 2271 (2016) (No. 15-674)

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2016

While the Clean Air Act provision allowing suit to challenge rulemak- ing petition denials was closely tailored to Massa- chusetts’s interests, Respondents here can only point to the general APA cause … That language constitutes “rule[s] of agency organization, procedure, or prac- tice” exempt from notice-and-comment. 5 U.S.C. § 553(b)(A). 23 zation cards) in the period before and just after the

Appendix — Del-AWARE Unlimited, Inc. v. Baldwin

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1984

to the DER actions under the Clean Water Act. … §404 of the Clean Water Act.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — AirStar Helicopters, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003

Comment Discussion and Final Action At the close of the comment period, over 1,000 comments were received on Notice 99-11 and 556 comments were received on Notice 99-12. … Several air tour industry commenters state that the period allowed for inactivity should be lengthened.

Amicus Curiae Brief — AMG Capital Management, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Trade Commission

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 2, 2020

Air. Reg. Grp. v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 327-28 (2014). Nor may it have a court do so on its behalf. … Air Reg. Grp., 573 U.S. at 328 (cleaned up). Nor would they be any good at such projects if they tried.