Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Trevor Murray, Petitioner v. UBS Securities, LLC, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 5, 2023

§ 20109; Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act, 49 U.S.C. § 30171; Surface Transportation Assistance Act, 49 U.S.C. § 31105; AIR-21, 49 U.S.C. § 42121; Pipeline Safety Improvement Act, 49 … No. 107-146, at 2 (2002) (cleaned up)).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Paul C. Clark, Sr., et al., Petitioners v. Council of Unit Owners of the 100 Harborview Drive Condominium

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 4, 2021

Section 11.3 is consistent with the Debtor’s bylaws and the Maryland Condominium Act. See D. Ex. 2; Maryland Condominium Act § 11-109. … The air samples passed.

Amicus Curiae Brief — American Electric Power Service Co. Corp. v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington (Nos. 06-1462, 06-1457)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

See Reference re Upper Churchill Water Rights Reversion Act, [1984] 1 S.C.R. 297. … ° 23 See Upper Churchill Water Rights Reversion Act, S.

Map Too Large For Filming — New York v. New Jersey

Supreme Court brief · Map Too Large For Filming · 1921

Borough: Actes. … —Of course, it is only the mal-odorous element in sewage that makes this phenomenon noticeable: evaporation from clean water would act precisely in a similar manner, but it would manifest itself in

Opposition Brief — South Dakota v. Department of the Interior (No. 05-1428)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2006

Ct. 1976 (2006) ......... 21 Statutes: Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 701 et seg. ...... 7 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7409(b)(1) ..............0.0-. 15 Indian General Allotment Act of 1887, … In Whitman itself, this Court reversed the court of appeals’ determination that the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7409(b)(1), unconstitutionally delegated Congress’s leg- islative power to the Environmental

Prologue — New Jersey v. New York City

Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 1935

And I said during the period of the war, about six months, I was acting Mayor. … They might clean a car, or they might drive a person—act as temporary een Spergt For Plawmtif—Ralph Borden, direct.

Opposition Brief — American Mining Congress v. Thomas

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986

The initial comment period, which continued for 11 weeks, was reopened on two occasions. See 48 Fed. Reg. 50906 (1983); 48 Fed. Reg. 52604 (1983). … Such a notice requirement would lead to a never-ending cycle of public notice and comment and thereby frustrate impor- tant statutory purposes, which, in the case of the Clean Water Act, Congress determined

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Norris Williams, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 17, 2021

Please check the appropriate boxes: XPetitioner has previously .been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the following court(s): U S courl- OP Air zais 114' cl.r, ;./- s coo,- -)le 04A--4ef … Comments: haps ://1 0.33.1 24.1 06/truweb/InmateInquiryCombined.asnx 1 nil um?

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Regier, Secretary, Florida Department of Children & Families v. Does 1-13

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2004

Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546 (1986) .....-eee seer ere ererees 10, 11 Pennsylvania v. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Counsel for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711 (1987) ....-- eee e reer reer r eres 11 Planned Parenthood of Central and Northern Arizona v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Monsanto Company, Petitioner v. John L. Durnell

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 2, 2026

(cleaned up); see also Cuomo v. … Mensing, 564 U.S. at 622 (cleaned up).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Arkansas v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991

Construction of the Clean Water Act 1. … Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7642, which prohibits “significant deterioration” of air quality in “clean air areas,” and quanti- fies “significant” in terms of “maximum allowable increases” in the concentrations

Opposition — Franklin Mint Corporation v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983

That report was written before delivery of the machines to Kern, well within the seven day notice period. … Gold Reserve Act of 1934, ch. 6, §§ 3, 6, 48 Stat. 340 (1930) (repealed by Par Value Modification Act of 1973, Pub. L. No. 93-110, 87 Stat. 353 (1973)).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cifolo v. General Electric Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1953

Thus, where the injured employee or dependent is not entitled to Workmen’s Compensation under the act, the act cannot be used to deprive him of pre-existing or other common-law or statutory rights. … Such wash rooms shall be kept clean and properly heated. (b) Lock- ers shall be provided for the employees’ clothing.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

In fact, the inclusion of “isolated water bodies” does not dramatically alter the reach of the Clean Water Act beyond areas Petitioner finds acceptable. … Petitioner also downplays the biological role of isolated water bodies as a secondary concern of the Clean Water Act.

Jurisdictional Statement — Askew v. American Waterways Operators, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1973

The Geparuacnt »Lall periodically consult with other departments of the state and specifically with the department of air and water pollution control relative to procedures forthe prevention of discharges … contropursuant to a permit issued by department of air Section 21.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Seven County Infrastructure Coalition, et al., Petitioners v. Eagle County, Colorado, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 4, 2024

Indeed, shortly after NEPA’s passage, Congress enacted major substantive authorizing statutes, such as the Clean Air Act of 1970 and the Clean Water Act of 1972, which empowered the Environmental Protection … EPA, 597 U.S. 697, 723 (2022) (cleaned up).

Reply Brief — Perry Hopman, Petitioner v. Union Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jan 23, 2024

The employer also has the right to require that the employee provide periodic updates on his condition and possible date of return. … Clean-Up Group, Inc., 96 F.3d 506, 515 n. 9 (1st Cir. 1996) (same under ADA); Nawrot v. CPC Int’l, 259 F. Supp. 2d 716, 726 (N.D.

Motion — New Jersey v. City of New York

Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1931

the tank, the valve is again closed, and that during the period of this operation materials may go into the out- let thatacannot go there when the valve is closed; that this kind of cleaning process … RRR AIRE Lae isi Die _ at Ek a?

Appendix — Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. Worthington

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1986

One commentator has suggested: “Critics _ are wrong when they assert that the Harbor Workers’ Act indicates congressional intent to Congress had tried to treat land-based workers and seamen differently … sea, not the perils of the air.

Amicus Curiae Brief — South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

American Trucking Ass'n, 531 U.S. 457 (2001) ....- 6. eee eee cece eees 6-7, 11 Statutes and Regulations: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7409 «0... 52sec eee eres 23 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 125l … Unlike for the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7409, there are no generally applicable nationally uniform ambient standards applicable to all waters. 2.