Documents

Transcript of Record — Rickert Rice Mills, Inc. v. Fontenot

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1936

+\ Bene ware air, oat; TRANSCRIPT OF RECORD Supreme Court of the United States OCTOBER TERM, 1935. : No. 581 Gs T. SIMON, PETITIONER ) vs. RUFUS W. … The base period in. the,case of all agricultural commodities except tobacco shall be the « prewar period, August 1909-July 1914: In the case of tobacco, the base period shall be the postwar period,

Respondents Brief — Midlantic Nat. Bank v. New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1986

Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act), 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. (enacted 1948, most recently amended 1984). … Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq. (enacted 1976, most recently amended 1984). e. Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.

Respondents Brief — O'Neill v. City of New York, 105 S. Ct. 2110 (1985) (No. 84-805)

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1985

Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act), 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. (enacted 1948, most recently amended 1984). … Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq. (enacted 1976, most recently amended 1984). e. Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — SD Warren Co. v. Maine Bd. of Environmental Protection

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006

Miles, Comment, Searching For The Definition Of “Discharge”: Section 401 Of The Clean Water Act, 28 ENVTL. … The pertinent text from both acts, beginning with the Clean Water Act, follows. Clean Water Act 33 U.S.C. § 1341.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — City of Loveland v. Board of Commissioners

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2011

Water Act consent decrees mean,” or even “how should a _ specific paragraph or section of a broad spectrum of Clean Water Act consent decrees be interpreted,” but how this particular consent decree … Rivet, 522 U.S. at 476. 20 the consent decree; it was not created by the Clean Water Act.

Joint Appendix vol I — NTA Graphics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix vol I · 1994

- If at any time machinery needs cleaning or adjusting while in operation, secure the permission of the fore- man first. - Never use compressed air to clean the clothing you are wearing. … SAFETY AIR COMPRESSORS AND AUXILLIARY EQUIPMENT 1. Keep air compressors and equipment clean and area clean. 2. Never adjust or repair until air compressor is electri- cally locked out. 3.

Respondents Brief — United States v. Texas, 136 S. Ct. 2271 (2016) (No. 15-674)

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2016

The procedural right in Massachusetts was specifically granted by Congress to, inter alia, allow the particular type of suit at issue: a suit to re- view the denial of a Clean Air Act rulemaking peti … In enacting the Clean Air Act, Congress both preempted Massa- chusetts from enacting its own regulations of air pol- 23 lution and provided it a corresponding cause of ac- tion to challenge Executive

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bragg v. West Virginia Coal Ass'n

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002

(RCRA), the Clean Air Act (CAA), and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). … Five circuits have held that approved State Implementation Plans (SIPs) under the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. § 7410, are federally enforceable in citizen suits. Espinosa v.

Appendix — Chicago Park District v. Alexander

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1986

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 578 F.2d 115, 116 (Sth Cir.1978). … ,” “clean,” “in need of cleaning,” and “unacceptable” into the categories “very clean” and “less than very clean”).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Radio Communications Corporation, Petitioner v. Federal Communications Commission, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 18, 2025

Circuit’s judgment that certain parties lacked standing to litigate alleged injuries caused by the EPA’s approval of California’s Clean Air Act regulations on the grounds that they were unaffected bystanders … Specifically, the NPRM proposed, with respect to the statutory requirement that stations air 18 hours of programming each day during the 90-day eligibility period, that applicants must certify that the

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement v. Johnson Controls, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991

of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq...passim § 701 (k), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(k) 0... ee 16 § 703 (e), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(e) ........ erence 21 Clean Air Act,« U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. ...........cen.. 27 … Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. §$ 1317(a); Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.; Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.S.C. $651; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C

Opposition Brief — Stroh Die Casting Co. v. Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1997

(“Atlantic”), under the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1365. … Mootness doctrine thus protects defendants from the maintenance of Suit under the Clean Air Act based solely on violations wholly unconnected to any present or future wrongdoing, while it also protects

Appendix — Schwarz v. Coastal Resources Management Council

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1981

Water Pollution Contol Act Amendments 1972 (Pub. … ‘Defend clean water we have left?

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bersani v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989

| re 7 RIE Teme. i a 7 p SS nk, ir 2 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES --Continued PAGE Clean Water Act pig te a rs passim Clean Air Act 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(5)(A)@iii) 2... 10 a 2 Final Determination … In a unanimous opinion, the court struck down the EPA’s interpretation of a provision of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(5)(A)(iii) in language that is equally applicable here: In short, none

Respondents Brief — Nat'l Ass'n of Mfrs. v. Dep't of Def., 137 S. Ct. 811 (2017) (No. 16-299)

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2017

The Clean Water Act Congress enacted the Clean Water Act in 1972 to restore and protect the “chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters.” 33 U.S.C. §1251(a). … Reg. 22,188, and received over a million public comments. EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0880-20872 (Response to Comments). They ultimately issued the final Clean Water Rule on June 29, 2015.

Amicus Brief — Community Communications Co. v. Boulder

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1982

Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7401, et seq. eeeeeeaeoeeeeeeaeeeeeeeeeeeee ee ee Ohio Rev. … Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.; Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C § 1251 et seq.; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C

Respondents Brief — Parker Drilling Mgmt. Servs., Ltd. v. Newton, 139 S. Ct. 914 (2019) (No. 18-389)

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2019

For example, under § 328 of the Clean Air Act, for OCS facilities located within 25 miles of a State, Environ- mental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulations are to be “the same as would be applicable … And, in federal facilities, federal agencies and departments are required to comply with federal, state, and local clean-air, clean-water, and hazardous- waste standards.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Starzenski v. City of Elkhart

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996

This case is replete with a litany of efforts by the City of Elkhart, over a period of approximately thirteen (13) years to force the Plaintiffs in this cause to clean up property determined to be substandard … As added by Acts 198], P.L. 309, SEC. 28.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Thomas P. Harwood, III, Petitioner v. American Airlines, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 14, 2022

Evatt, 902 F.2d 273, 278 (4th Cir. 1990) (cleaned up). … Francis, 452 F.3d at 303 (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Missouri v. Jenkins

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

Delaware Valley Citizen’s Council for Clean Air, 107 S.Ct.3078 (1987) (“Pennsylvania OF ieee cb enssndscendnanedseWhessensbenseceosecs 5, 6 Procunier v. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Counsel for Clean Air, 107 S.Ct.3078, 3093 (1987) (Blackmun J., dissenting) (emphasis added) (“Pennsylvania II”).