Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.23s
Reply Brief — Paul C. Bolin, Petitioner v. Ron Broomfield, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jul 12, 2022
They heard nothing about his occupational exposure to neurotoxins, working below decks as an engineman. 2App. 382-83, 399, 426. See generally Petn. 6-7, 27-28. … Williams, 529 U.S. at 399; Petn. 29. Mr.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 28, 2025
NO. 24-922 In the Supreme Court of the United States ________________ JAMES HARPER, Petitioner, v. … RAY ANDREWS BROWN, THE LAW OF PERSONAL PROPERTY 399–504 (2d ed. 1955).
Amicus Brief for the United States — Cooper v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief for the United States · 1984
Cook, 586 F.2d 399 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 883 (1979); Jones-Bey v. … \ 24 action (page 5, supra); the district court agreed, and expressly so stated in its denial of intervention (Pet.
467 U.S. 867Amicus Curiae Brief — Edward A. Caniglia, Petitioner v. Robert F. Strom, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 15, 2021
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 4849 (1970). So “for the purposes of the Fourth Amendment there is a constitutional difference between houses and cars.” Id. at 52. … When there is no such urgency, police must obtain a warrant. 24 The community caretaking exception eliminates any imminence requirement.
Amicus Brief — Scott v. Kentucky Parole Bd.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1976
Eldridge, No. 74-204, decided February 24, 1976, slip op. 10. … United States Board of Parole, 399 F.2d 297 (C.A. 10).
429 U.S. 60Amicus Curiae Brief — Robert A. Rucho, et al., Appellants v. Common Cause, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 8, 2019
Id. at 24 (alteration in original). … McConnell, The Redistricting Cases: Original Mistakes and Current Consequences, 24 Harv. J.L. & Pub.
Prologue — Mateljan v. California
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2006
Municipal Court, 24 Cal.3d 742 (1979)............. 24 Brady v. Maryland, 73 U.S. 83 (1963) ................000000 passim Bush v. … Rutherford, 14 Cal.3d 399 (1976)...........cccccceeeees 24 People v. Willis, 28 Cal.4th 22 (2002) ..0........:ccccceeesecceeeeees 18 Rittenband v.
546 U.S. 1171Opposition Brief — Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. American Land Title Ass'n
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
IT 1990) thereafter “section 24 (Seventh)”). … OCC Pet. at 11-16; Chase Pet. at 19-24.
508 U.S. 971Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Arthur Tyrone Lee, Jr., Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 17, 2020
Medley, 972 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 2020) ................................ 8, 9, 12, 13 United States v. … Appx. 919, 923-24 (6th Cir. 2020); United States v. Benamor, 937 F.3d 1182, 1188-89 (9th Cir. 2019).
Prologue — American Jewish Congress v. Corporation for National & Community Service
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2006
Kendrick, i So) 20, 22, 23, 24 Comm. for Pub. Educ. & Rel. Liberty v. Nyquist, Lt yf : EER HEE 10, 22, 24 Comm. for Pub. Educ. & Rel. Liberty v. Regan, oo SEER eae S 11,24 Eulitt v. … A) reversing the District Court is reported at 399 F.3d 351. The District Court’s opinion (Pet. App. B) granting summary judgment to AJC is reported at 323 F. Supp. 2d 44.
546 U.S. 1130Brief for the United States — United States v. Atkinson
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1936
.--- 16 * Statutes: ' War Risk Insurance Act, as amended: , ' Sec. 13 (Oct. 6, 1917, c. 105, sec. 2, 40 Stat. 398, 399) . 18 Sec. 18 (Dec. 24, 1919, c. 16, 41 Stat. 371, 376) _____- 13, 19 , Sec. … [December 24, 1919, c. 16, 41 Stat. 371, 376. ] Sec. 400.
297 U.S. 157Opposition — Edwards v. Arizona
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981
(R.T. of Mar. 4, 7, 11, 1977, at 24-25, 40, 51.) … (R.T. of Mar. 24, 28, 1977, at 4-19 to 4-24, 4-34; R.T. of Apr. 21, 1977, at 93, 191; R.T. of Apr. 22, 1977, at 3-10 to 3-12, 3-16 to 3-17.)
451 U.S. 477Record and brief — Amer. Express Co. v. US Horse Shoe Co.
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1917
PUTNAM INVESTMENT COMPANY, 10 24 LAY ET AL. Vv. LAY ETAL. 633 26 STATE OF GEORGIA V. … REDERIAKTIEBOLAGET BORE, CLAIMANT. 745 1 AIRS MS LOR re RINE HE ie NA, BEN SUPREME COURT RECORDS & BRIEFS 1918 FULL OPINIONS __ CITATION TITLES CASE#4 248 U.S, 399 FINK ET AL.., TRUSTEES &C., V
244 U.S. 58Reply Brief — Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Southern California Rapid Transit District
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1992
(Peti- tion for Review at 24.) … App. 3d 399, 409 (1981)], or on ripeness grounds. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365, 386, 47 S. Ct. 114, 71 L. Ed. 303, 310 (1926); Agins v.
505 U.S. 1220Per Curiam — Duncan v. Tennessee
Supreme Court brief · Per Curiam · 1972
W. 24 491, certiorari dismissed as improvidently 2 for petitioner. © A: 4 Everett H. Falk, Assistant a0 General.of ‘Ton nessee, argued the cause for respondent. … Winsett, 217 Tenn. 564, 399 8. W. 2d 741 (1965), the Tennessee Supreme Court a “Stated the following with regard to the state robbery statute, supra, 8 21 8.
405 U.S. 127Amicus Curiae Brief — Charles G. Moore, et ux., Petitioners v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 6, 2023
Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). … , Gallup (May 24, 2023), http://bit.ly/3yvPrvr.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1968
Findings of Fact and Conclusions “ of Law .. pices Sol Appendix I. ieeieik seth | secccee “24 - o : TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CITED — American’ Communication Association. Ve: Douds, .339- Uz. … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399; Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360; American Communication Association v.
392 U.S. 905Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Democratic Organization of Cook County v. Shakman
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1971
The case, as previously stated, is also brought on behalf of classes of present and future candidates and voters as well as taxpayers [24, 28]. See Brockington v, Rhodes, 396 U. 8S. 41 (1969). … Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party of Minnesota, 399 F. 2d 119 (8th Cir. 1968).
402 U.S. 909Motion to Affirm — Millis v. High Drive Water District
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Affirm · 1978
Kolodziejski, 399 U.S. 204 (1970); Cipriano v. City of Houma, 395 U.S. 701 (1969). … Appellants’ Jurisdictional Statement, Appendix A at Page 24."
439 U.S. 802Opposition Brief — Rye v. Seattle Times Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1984
Cowles Publishing Co., 76 Wash.2d 707, 459 P.2d 8 (1969), cert. denied, 399 U.S. 927 (1970)... … Rye petitioned the state Supreme Court for discretionary review, which petition was denied on July 24, 1984. Pet. App. at A-i. Rye then filed this petition for certiorari.
469 U.S. 1087
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.