Documents

Opposition Brief — Bragg v. West Virginia Coal Ass'n

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2002

VI, Cl. 2 (Supremacy Clause) 22 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7604 23 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1865 20.0... ...ccscssssscssssssesesssvsssosesees 23 Education of the oe Act, 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq. 23 … Kean, 871 F.2d 319, 322-325 (3d Cir. 1989) (holding that, under citizen suit provision of Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7604, district court has jurisdiction over citizen suit to compel state offi- cials

Amicus Curiae Brief — Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995

Second Session at p.18: “ The Committee drew on the similar provisions of the Clean Air Act of 1970 and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 20 Amendments of 1972. … As discussed, supra, the history makes 24 clear that the RCRA citizen suit provision is based upon the comparable provision of the Clean Air Act.

Amicus Brief — Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1978

To the same effect are: the Clean Air Act (“any party“), “ discussed in Delaware Citizens for Clean Air, Inc. v. Stauffer Chemical Co., 62 F.R.D. 353 (D. … Del. 1974); the Noise Pollution Control Act (“any party“), “ patterned after the Clean Air Act; the Voting Rights Act Extension of 1975 (“prevailing party“) “; the Toxic Substances Control Act (“in

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kisor v. Wilkie, 139 S. Ct. 657 (2018) (No. 18-15)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

Under the Clean Air Act, a company must obtain a permit to operate a stationary source of air pollution. The permitting process has been assigned to the States. … abusive telemarketing acts or practices.” 15 U.S.C. § 6102(a)(1).

Reply Brief — Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, et al., Petitioners v. Ohio, ex rel. Dave Yost, Attorney General

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Oct 26, 2021

Air Act (“CAA”) restricts states from even “attempt[ing] to enforce” tampering laws against manufacturers’ nationwide conduct, allowing this case to proceed would itself violate the very right petitioners … Air Act proscribes” ignores the numerous post-sale enforcement mechanisms the CAA directs EPA to employ—such as in-use testing, defect reporting, warranty compliance, recalls, and the CAA’s antitampering

Opinion — Askew v. American Waterways Operators, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1973

and $1161 of the Federal Act when it comes to damages ‘to property interests, for the Federal Act reaches only costs of cleaning up. … While the Federal Act is concerned only with actual clean-up costs incurred by the Federal Government, the State of Florida is concerned with its own clean-up costs.

Appendix — City of New York, New York v. Catskill Mountain Chapter of Trout Unlimited (No. 06-729)

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2006

under the Clean Water Act). . … Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. Ii. Background Water transfers occur routinely and in many different contexts across the United States.

Appendix — Walker Towing Corp. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1989

The entry states that the crew was ‘‘[w]ashing ice through main locks cleaning snow from lock walls and steps. Cleaning pusherboat off and breaking ice in aux locks.’? … Clean Coal Terminals.

Appendix — Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. Public Service Commission

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1980

Moreover, Con Edison argues that nuclear power is a proven technology, that it is safe, economical and clean. … Clean—Although sophisticated equipment is used to minimize air pollution at fossil-fueled plants, even the most modern oil or coal plants can’t match nuclear plants for cleanliness.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Nazarian v. PPL Energyplus, LLC, 135 S. Ct. 1582 (2015) (No. 14-614)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2015

See id. at 594-96 (explaining that federal amendments to the Clean Air Act "meant the end of the salad days for high-sulfur coal-producing states such as Illinois"). … Alliance for Clean Coal v.

Appendix — Polakow's Realty Experts, Inc. v. Alabama

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1943

State, 185 A. 93, the Superior Court of Delaware declared a dry cleaning law unconstitutional. … It could only act through an agent.

Opposition — Hartigan v. General Electric Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983

Spellman, 684 F. 2d 627 (9th Cir. 1982) 12, 16 Statutes and Regulations Atomic Energy Act, 42 U.S. C. § 2021(k) .............. 5 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. L. … Thus, the Clean Air Act was irrelevant and the Spent Fuel Statute fell squarely within the Atomic Energy Act's preemption of state regulation of radiological hazards.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Spawr Optical Research, Inc. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993

Air or gas compressors, n.e.s.! Air heaters, portable, fuel, fired, n.e.s. … Steam cleaning Steam generating power boilers, engines, and turbines, n.e.s.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2010

After consideration of the comments received in the sixty day comment period, the commission may adopt the rule in an open meeting. … The Act’s matching funds provisions function slightly differently during the general election period than durnng the primary election period.

Amicus Curiae Brief — James L. Kisor, Petitioner v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 31, 2019

Under the Clean Air Act, a company must obtain a permit to operate a stationary source of air pollution. The permitting process has been assigned to the States. … In 1998, however, the EPA issued a memorandum entitled “Periodic Monitoring Guidance.”

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Eastman Kodak Co. v. Thomas

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2000

of the act, that triggers the limitations period. … In United Air Lines v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mizani v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996

On App. 2 November 29, 1994, Mizani, with three co-defendants, was indicted by a grand jury and charged in a four-count indictment with violations of the Clean Air Act arising from Mizani’s attempts … The defendant agreed to plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to violate the Clean Air Act in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, to pay a special assessment of $50 at the time of sen- tencing, and to

Reply Brief — Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2004

FMCSA was not required to conduct a con- formity review under the Clean Air Act 16 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases: Appalachian Power Co. v. EPA, 251 F.3d 1026 (D.C. … Catholic Action of Haw., 454 U.S. 189 (1981) 13 Statutes and regulations: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.: 42 U.S.C. 75060601) 1, 16 42 U.S.C. 7521 et seg. . . 10 42 U.S.C. 7522) (1) 10

Transcript of Record — Parker v. Brown

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1943

In fhe case of 25-pound bags, yes, air. … Yes.“ — } aya) aire Pa ether : ; - KE...

Amicus Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. Brown

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1977

(Clean Air Act): ee ide cbeeneeeneeden 9 Section 113 (42 U.S.C. §1857ce-8) ................2... 12 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States OcTOBER TERM, 1976 Nos. 75-909, 75-960, 75-1050 and 75 … Title 42, United States Code, Section 1857e-5(c), con- fers upon the Administrator the power to promulgate a state implementation plan; but the Administrator has no power under the Clean Air Act to