Documents

Opposition Brief — Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994

Many commentators have suggested an economic model for a fair use privilege. … Air Pirates, 581 F.2d 751 (9th Cir. 1978); Rogers v. Koons, 960 F.2d 301 (2d Cir. 1992).

Petition — Riegel Textile Corp. v. Gryc ex rel. Gryc

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

See Swartz, Product Liahility: The Torch Cases, 76 Case & Comment, No. 1, p. 3 (1971); Comment, Dressed to Kill: The Flammable Fabrics Act of 1953, 4 Cum.-Sam. L. … Overbooking had been discussed in period- icals of general circulation."

Petition — Shell Oil Co. v. West Michigan Environmental Action Council, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979

Now, in regard to air or its proposed pollution, it is not clear, first of all, whether noise or noise pollution is pro- hibited by the Michigan Environmental Protection Act as it relates to air as … To keep him occupied, I had him clean the blackboard there. He did a pretty good job, but he aso put some gook on that table.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Joslyn Manufacturing Co. v. James

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

errr ror rrr Terre rr Te Tee 3 Statutes: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7601 ef seq. ......... 15 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compen- sation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601 ef BR gc cn Chix … Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7601 ef seq. 16 conflict among the courts of appeals, (2) the possibility that the issue may have limited importance in many cases, and (3) the fact-specific nature of the inquiry

Respondents Brief — Learning Resources, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Oct 20, 2025

Air Regul. Grp. v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 324 (2014) (cleaned up); see also Ala. … And it assumed that the Clean Air Act permits some “system of emission reduction” beyond those governing individual sources, but not a cap-and-trade system. West Virginia, 597 U.S. at 734–35 & n.5.

Petition — Tug Ocean Prince, Inc. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979

A-22 The Clean Water Restoration Act of 1966 (33 U.S.C, §466) amended the Oil Pollution Act of 1924. … Transcontinental & Western Air, supra.

Opposition Brief — Are Acquisitions, LLC v. Hanna (No. 07-890)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2007

Suburban Hosp., Inc., 385 Md. 677, 870 A.2d 592 (2005); Bennett Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. … Petitioner cannot demonstrate that the Maryland Court of Appeals lacked an adequate procedural basis on which to deny the Motion for Reconsideration, which that court did quickly, without comment,

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Worthington Corp. v. Lease Management, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1966

But there was no evidence to link these two separate and distinct acts. … Linde Air Products Co., 336 U.S. 271, 275 (1949). Thus the question is not one of power, but propriety.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of the Air Force, et al., Petitioners v. Prutehi Guahan, fka Prutehi Litekyan

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 27, 2026

Dep’t of the Air Force, 128 F. 4th 1089 (9th Cir. 2025), cert. granted sub nom. Dep’t of the Air Force v. Prutehi Guahan, 146 S. … Beginning in 1987, the Department of Energy (DOE) and the EPA worked with Washington State to start cleaning up the Hanford Site.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kay Ellison, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 24, 2025

The Card Processor, acting on behalf of Bank #2, also periodically received and reviewed financial statements that contained information regarding Direct Air’s purported financial performance and health … Direct Air periodically offered a promotion called the “Family Ties” program, which allowed passengers to purchase vouchers redeemable for future flights.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 7, 2024

The Clean Air Act authorizes EPA to waive preemption only if California “needs” its own standards to address a “compelling and extraordinary” problem in California. … Fish and Wildlife Service under the Endangered Species Act. 520 U.S. at 158-59.

Amicus Brief — County Board of Arlington County v. Richards

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1977

Under Section 110 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1857c-5, the states and District of Columbia are required to submit to the En- vironmental Protection Agency plans for meeting EPA's national ambient … Air Act.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Genendo Pharmaceutical v. United States (No. 07-477)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007

In Massachusetts, this Court interpreted § 202(a){1) of the Clean Air Act which provides that EPA “shall by regulation prescribe . . . standards applicable to the emission of any air pollutant of any … First, the Court’s interpretation of the phrase “any air pollutant” was guided by the Clean Air Act’s “sweeping definition of ‘air pollutant,” a definition that embraced “all airborne compounds of whatever

Respondents Brief — American Textile Mfrs. Institute, Inc. v. Donovan

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1981

Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, as amended, 42 U.S.C. $7401 Ob 809. ......-..--.-....-00-nie--eccsenene--<- 3b & 7545 (c) (2) (A) --..--.---. … Another statute which requires cost-benefit evaluations for some regulations but not for others is the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., which were passed the same

Appendix — Mainstream Marketing Services, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2004

The comment period ended June 28, 2002. … commenters suggested various time periods to limit the exemption.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc. v. Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991

. § 11046; Section 7002 of the Resource Conser- vation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6972; Section 20 of the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2619(a)(1); and Section 304 of the Clean Air Act … , 42 U.S.C. § 7604 (as amended by Section 707 of the Clean Air Act Amend- ments of 1990, P.L. 101-549).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995

Second Session e p.18: The Committee drew on the similar provisions of the Clean Air Act of 1970 and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. … As discussed, supra, the history makes clear that the RCRA citizen suit provision is based upon the comparable 30 provisions of the Clean Air Act.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Joslyn Manufacturing Co. v. James

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991

whose stock was owned by Harvard, qualified for the PSD exemption in the Clean Air Act as a nonprofit health or education institution. … Comment, 38 Mercer L.Rev. at 685. If T.L.

Record and brief — Chesapeake & Ohio R. Co. v. Schwalb

Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1989

JA-97 A For the same period of time, for that same period of time, it would still— Court: You say you don’t know. I don’t think you can ask him what somebody else said. Mr. … I believe there was on period that he worked in the maintenance gang for a short period. Q But primarily he’s worked at the piers? A Primarily at the piers, yes. Q Okay.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus — Vey, In re: (No. 98-17)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Mandamus · 1998

Vey detected this during a 13-year period of submissions of her Pri- ma Facie Habeas Corpus, without rebuttal evidence , and her Federal Crime Detection Reports in both litigation and letter form to … In all the above and more, know that officials are responsible for acts omitted Johnson v. Duffy (1978) 588 F2d 740 acts through training, supervi- Sion and discipline Hill v.