Documents

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dakota Access, LLC, Petitioner v. Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 20, 2021

Quality 3.12.1.1 Affected Environment The Clean Air Act (CAA) of 1970 requires that states adopt ambient air quality standards. … , National Environmental Policy Act, Clean Water Act, and the Rivers and Harbors Act.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Adis Kovac, et al., Petitioners v. Kash Patel, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 19, 2024

(cleaned up). Then, the agency must “point to a clear congressional authorization permitting its action.” Id. (cleaned up). … In West Virginia, the government relied on a combination of broader regulatory purpose and ancillary provisions to argue that the Clean Air Act conferred the power to issue a rule that functionally eliminates

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Memorial Day Day Weekend Salute to Veterans Corp. v. Wickersham (No. 07-142)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007

Furthermore, the City still operates normal commercial air-traffic during the Air Show period and, of course, the tower is in operation for the Air Show. Boston Dep. at 21:6-21. … The tarmac is not open to any members of the public except for the two-day time period of the Air Show. Boston Dep. at 112: 1-20.

Opposition Brief — Agrashell, Inc. v. Hammons Products Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1973

The Perry patent covered ‘‘pelletized nutshells . . . with the hardness of black walnut shells” ‘‘for use in air blasts for cleaning metal’’ (IV App. 3); the exclusive-dealing commit- ments secured … See RESTATEMENT - ees eT eeeee PINAR TRO SE I de 14 (2d) or AcENoy, §14J, Comment b(6) and (7). See also United States v.

Joint Appendix — National Ass'n v. Defenders of Wildlife

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 2007

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: The public comment period on the State’s request for approval to administer the proposed AZPDES program is currently open and will end September 16, 2002. … received during the public comment period on EPA’s proposed approval of the AZPDES program.

Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — King v. Palmer

Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1992

Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7604(d). … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 106 S.

Petition — Standard Alliance Industries, Inc. v. Black Clawson Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979

Comment Four, supra; Eckstein v. Cummins, 41 Ohio App. 2d 1, 321 N. E. 2d 897, 901 (1974). … Tried the tape about 6:15 P.M. and then the un- A46 loading swing arm was not acting properly.

Respondents Brief — Western Oil & Gas Association v. California

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1983

"See, e.g., Clean Air Act, § 110, 42 U.S.C, § 7410 (Supp. … See, eg., Clean Air Act §118, 42 U.S.C. §7415 (Supp. V 1951); Resource Conservation and Recovery Act § 6001, 42 U.S.C. § 6961 (1976 & Supp.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Chevron Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. San Mateo County, California, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 22, 2022

Air Act. … Air Act.”

Opposition Brief — Accinanto, Ltd. v. A/S J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1953

The Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (quoted, R. 30) should be construed in the same way. … By that Act, the term “ear- riage of Goods” covers the period from the time when the goods are loaded on to the time when they are discharged from the ship, 46 U. S. C. 1301(e).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mead Corp. v. Beazer East, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995

As we have already explained, its argument that these words merely reflect an intent to protect the seller during a transition period immediately following the transfer of assets to the buyer fails … In accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.

Appendix C — City of Tampa v. Voyeur Dorm, L. C.

Supreme Court brief · Appendix C · 2002

Keep the premises clean and sanitary. ii. Remove all garbage in a clean and sanitary manner. iii. Keep all plumbing fixtures clean and sani- tary. iv. … App. 41 This Restrictive Covenant is a reasonable and neces- sary restraint of trade and does not violate the Sher- man Antitrust Act, the Florida Antitrust Act, or the common law; it is supported

Amicus Curiae Brief — PUD No. 1 of Jefferson Cty. v. Washington Dept. of Ecology

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

The Washington Supreme Court’s Decision Misinterprets State Authority Under § 401 Of The Clean Water Act... 7 1. … The Washington Supreme Court’s Decision Mis- interprets State Authority Under § 401 Of The Clean Water Act.

Reply Brief — West Virginia Univ. Hospitals, Inc. v. Casey

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1991

of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7604(d). … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air that costs "crucial" to the enforcement of the Clean Air Act are compensable under the Clean Air Act’s similarly-worded fee shifting provision.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — LPP v. Continental Airlines, 216 B.R. 1049 (1998) (No. 97-1030)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998

or acts sought to be restrained. ... … In the final days of the period, Eastern was approached by a potential suitor, the Texas Air Corporation, Eastern seri- ously considered accepting Texas Air’s offer if it could not resuscitate itself

Petitioners Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2009

American Trucking Ass’ns, 531 U.S. 457 (2001), which considered EPA’s authority to consider costs under §109(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7409(b)(1). … ‘To the contrary, this Court distinguished several court of appeals decisions finding “authority for the EPA to consider costs” under other provisions of the Clean Air Act, even though those provisions

Opposition Brief — Laguna Gatuna, Inc. v. Browner

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1996

1] Clean Air Amendments of 1970, Pub. … Clean Air Amendments of 1970, Pub. L. No. 91-604, § 4(a), 84 Stat. 1686-1687. The similar provisions of the CWA were adopted in 1972. Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, Pub.

Appendix — Air Pollution Variance Bd. of Colo. v. Western Alfalfa Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1974

air pollution control act? … I am going to hand you a copy of the 1970 air pollution control act and ask you to point out to me the statement you just made. A. This is the enabling act.

Application — Wendy Gish, et al., Applicants v. Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Application · Jan 7, 2021

• Establish frequent cleaning and disinfection of personal work areas such as desks and cubicles and supply the necessary cleaning products. … Clean meeting areas between each use as described in this guidance.

Petition — Cotton Warehouse Ass'n v. Marshall

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

At the close of the comment period, OSHA conducted hearings in three cities for a total of 14 days.** The comments and exhibits received before the hearings, the written and oral testimony of the hearing … In the Clean Air Act, for example, Congress required the Environmental Protec- tion Agency to perform a “cost benefit analysis” before prohibiting the manufacture or sale of a fuel or fuel additive