Documents

Respondents Brief — Nat'l Ass'n of Mfrs. v. Dep't of Def., 137 S. Ct. 811 (2017) (No. 16-299)

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2017

... 5 Pe i sinnecntinciineenienenscinenanetameininniianieneseinimmimmenpnenes 5 Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 42 U.S.C. 2011 et seg. ............ 37 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 e€ 8€@. ..........c0. … See Harrison, 446 U.S. at 592 n.9 (re- jecting parallel argument for narrow construction of the provision for review of agency action in the courts of ap- peals in the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401

Petitioners Brief — American Textile Mfrs. Institute, Inc. v. Donovan

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1981

More recently, under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7412 (Supp. … Air Act Amendments of 1977.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Carpenter Technology Corp. v. Agere Systems, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2010

Sites Cleanup Act, 35 Pa. … (Seibel N.T. 53:6-54:5) The air stripper bubbled air through the water, causing the volatile organic compounds to exit the water into the air.

Appendix Vol II — Burlington v. Dague

Supreme Court brief · Appendix Vol II · 1992

Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711 (1987). … (“the Clean Water Act”). 2.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

The regulations also potentially impair the ability of these states to comply with their federally required air quality plans under the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). … Chronic exposure to elevated ambient PM levels over a long period has been associated with de- creased lung function in certain groups of people, includ- ing children and teenagers. David E.

Appendix — City of Cincinnati v. Miller

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2011

An area designated as a nonattainment area for ozone or carbon monoxide under the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) … Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.)

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Joe Holbert, Petitioner v. Thompson Industrial Service, L.L.C., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 16, 2026

The Thompson and Clean Harbors entities were my employers, joint employers and/or acted as an integrated enterprise. … He made sexual comments suggesting that he wanted to see my Perns because Of stereotype that Black men have large penises.

Motion for divided argument — Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Motion for divided argument · Mar 19, 2025

In 2022, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reinstated a waiver that EPA had granted to California in 2013 under Section 209(b) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7543(b), to allow California to enforce … Section 209(b) directs EPA to waive federal preemption under the Clean Air Act of California emissions standards under specified circumstances.

Respondents Brief — Territory of Guam, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Mar 24, 2021

The definition section alone refers to the “Safe Drinking Water Act,” “Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act,” “Solid Waste Disposal Act,” “Clean Air Act,” “Clean Water Act,” “Toxic … under section 307(a) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act [33 U.S.C. 1317(a)], (E) any hazardous air pollutant listed under section 112 of the Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7412], and (F) any imminently

Amicus Curiae Brief — Levine v. United Healthcare Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

As noted by one commentator: 12 .. . … Levine, supra, at 171. 18 While this Court made a “clean break" with the components of the prior savings clause test, it still preserved the preservationist theme of the McCarran- Ferguson Act.

Joint Appendix — Shell Oil Co. v. United States (Nos. 07-1607, 07-1601)

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 2009

JA-552 NOTE: Bulk shipments of D-D which exceed 500 gallons contain a Hazardous Substance (dichloropropene-dichloropropane mixture) as defined by the Clean Water Act (40 CFR Parts 116 and 117). … Divisibility Introductory Comment.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

The Court has before it precise facts which the Parties argue demonstrate that “Section 109 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 momen in setting revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for … Air Act Amendments of 1990, Pub.

Respondents Brief — Milwaukee v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1981

General Motors Corp., 406 U.S. 109 (1972) has not been preempted by either the Clean Air Act or the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (P.L. 92- 500) and Congress has not changed … General Motors Corp., supra, (post 1970 Amendments to the Clean Air Act); Vermont v. New York, supra, (post 1972 Amendments to the FWPCA).

Petitioners Brief — Burlington v. Dague

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1992

Section 6972(e), or Section 505 of the Fed- eral Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act), 33 U.S.C. … Delaware Valley Citizens Counsel for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 562-64 (1986) (“Delaware Valley I).

Appendices — Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Cae-Link Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Appendices · 1993

denied, ——— US. 101 S.Ct. 2031, 68 L.Ed.2d 334 (1981) (upholding authority of EPA under Clean Air Act to require a state to deny registration to vehicles which have not passed mandatory inspection); … Train was an EPA trans- portation control plan under the Clean Air Act for the National Capital Region.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Epic Sys. Corp. v. Lewis, 138 S. Ct. 42 (2017) (No. 16-285)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also issued a directive adhering to a judicially-invalidated interpretation of the Clean Air Act. Natl Enuvti. Dev. Ass'n’s Clean Air Project v. … Ass’n’s Clean Air Project, 752 F.3d at 1003. The D.C. Circuit found “no merit in EPA’s arguments” and struck down the directive to ignore Summit.

Response to application from respondents Phil Murphy, et al. — Kevin Robinson, et al., Applicants v. Phil Murphy, Governor of New Jersey, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Response to application from respondents Phil Murphy, et al. · Dec 3, 2020

And how quickly they will act. … Clues From 1918 Independent experts said these projections were critically important to act on, and act on quickly.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jake's Fireworks, Inc., Petitioner v. Consumer Product Safety Commission, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 24, 2024

U.S. at 601 (cleaned up). … EPA, the court considered letters from EPA’s Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation. 912 F.2d 1525, 1531-32 (D.C. Cir. 1990).

Appendix — Greenville Women's Clinic v. Bryant

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2001

Some of the suggestions made during this public comment period resulted in changes to Regulation 61-12, including some suggestions made by Planned Parenthood and the plaintiffs in this case. … The area shall be arranged to prevent cross traffic of clean and dirty material. Air flow in this area shall be from the “clean” area toward the “dirty” area. .

Respondents Brief — Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. Sierra Club, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Sep 16, 2020

Water Act, Clean Air Act, and Endangered Species Act. 84 Fed. … The Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act are cooperative federalism programs that typically require federal agencies to adhere to state regulatory 10 standards and processes.