Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.38s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Comments on 77 Fed. Reg. 30,473 (May 23, 2012), Docket ID No. … Since the inception of the Clean Water Act (““CWA” or “Act”), the U.S.
568 U.S. 1118Reply Brief — Alaska v. Southeast Alaska Alaska Conservation Council (No. 07-990)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2009
Be Bec Ce icecsiniiiainsessehcttassindineendapenaciaivd passim Hearing on Clean Water Act Definition of Fill Before the Subcomm. on Clean Air, Wetlands, and Climate Change of the S. … Water Act Definition of Fill Before the Subcomm. on Clean Air, Wetlands, and Climate Change of the S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — PUD No. 1 of Jefferson Cty. v. Washington Dept. of Ecology
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Air Act. … EPA —conducts environmental reviews of FERC’s hydropower licenses pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) of NEPA and Sec- tion 309 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
511 U.S. 700Opposition Brief — CropLife America v. Baykeeper
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2010
The case involves a straightforward issue of federal statutory construction the meaning of “discharge of a pollutant” under the Clean Water Act (“CWA” or “the Act”) and whether this phrase clearly … Similarly, pesticides may be regu- lated by EPA under both FIFRA and the Clean Air Act. See 58 Fed. Reg. 28,094 (May 12, 1993).
559 U.S. 936Joint Appendix — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 2013
Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1365, for the Clean Water Act violations described herein. … fl. | CLEAN WATER ACT VIOLATIONS. A.
568 U.S. 1118Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 4, 2024
Cir. 2008) (cleaned up). … Trans Air, Inc., 14 F.3d 342, 349 (7th Cir. 1994)).
Opposition Brief — Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. California Labor Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1997
Clean III are organized into two crews of six. n3 Each crew works seven day "hitches" at sea, alternating with seven day rest periods on shore. … While at sea, Clean Seas employees typically work 12 hour shifts, alternating with 12 hour rest periods. Mr.
520 U.S. 1248Brief for the Petitioner — United New York & New Jersey Sandy Hook Pilots Ass'n v. Halecki
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Petitioner · 1959
Act, : Spee 9-10 Viet. … - ing a generator and, as cleaning propulsion ma- _ chinery i is a kind of work a seaman would normally _ 52 do, cleaning a generator is seamen’s work and those who do it are entitled to a warranty
358 U.S. 613Opposition Brief — Ohio, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Sep 9, 2024
Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. … Congress enacted the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., “to protect and enhance the quality of the Nation’s air resources so as to promote the public health and welfare and the productive
Opposition — Train v. District of Columbia
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1976
Train, No. 75-1050. 3The Clean Air Act Amendments, 42 U.S.C. 1857h(d) provides that the District is a “state.” 4The pertinent regulatory requirements challenged are set forth in full in the Appendix … In view of the prolonged delays that have ayisen in the implementation of the clean air program nationally, it is 5 District of Columbia v. Train, —— US. App. D.C. ——, 521 F.2d at 904. 6 Art.
426 U.S. 904Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 11, 2025
. § 52.2270(e) (incorporating Texas Clean Air Act (Article 4477-5), Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes, as amended by S.B. 48 of 1969). … Yet as both parties acknowledge, the Clean Air Act was amended in 1990 to authorize citizen suits against any person “who is alleged to have violated” the Act. 42 U.S.C. § 7604(a)(1) (emphasis added).
Opposition Brief — Chevron Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. City of Hoboken, New Jersey, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Mar 31, 2023
Air Act. … Air Act viability of state-law claims.”
Opposition Brief — Hudson v. Reno
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998
Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546 (1986) .............ccceccseseeee 1» Pierce v. Underwood, 487 U.S. 552 (1988) ............. 17. 18 Reynolds v. … In a context similar to this one, this Court rejected a broad construction of a fee provision in the Clean Air Act because the statute “affects fee awards against the United States, as well as against
525 U.S. 822Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Carpenter Technology Corp. v. Agere Systems, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2010
Sites Cleanup Act, 35 Pa. … (Seibel N.T. 53:6-54:5) The air stripper bubbled air through the water, causing the volatile organic compounds to exit the water into the air.
562 U.S. 1062Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
Air Act); id. § 6912(a)(1) (same, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act); 33 U.S.C. § 1361(a) (Clean Water Act); see generally James L. … gional Administrator approves New Mexico's State Implementa- tion Plan, pursuant to Federal Clean Air Act). 1© See, e.g., Notice of Regulatory Waiver Requests Granted for the Second Quarter of Calendar
Petitioners Brief — American Textile Mfrs. Institute, Inc. v. Donovan
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1981
More recently, under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7412 (Supp. … Air Act Amendments of 1977.
452 U.S. 490Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 3, 2026
The Clean Air Act Does Not Preempt Respondents’ Causes of Action...................... 13 ii II. … Petitioners broadly resist any application of state law to their activities, first asserting that the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 22, 2023
There, Congress had empowered the EPA to enforce the Clean Air Act by limiting modifications to “stationary sources” that increased emissions. Chevron, 467 U.S. at 840. … The case dealt (in part) with a portion of the Clean Air Act called the “Prevention of Significant Deterioration” (PSD) program.
Record and brief — Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982
(6) The coated blanks were then passed through an in- frared drying oven maintained at an interior air temperature of 425° F for a period of 20 seconds to remove the water and form a dry film on the … Linde Air Products Co., 339 U.S. 605, 608 (1950). 2.
456 U.S. 990Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Dayless Manufacturing Co. v. Artmoore Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1954
Linde Air Products Co., Mais vdiks a0 ils eee dtionbaeaw swede 8,10 Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. … Linde Air Products Co., 336 U.S. 271, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. vy. Ray-O-Vac Co., 321 U. 8. 275, and many other cases.
347 U.S. 920
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.