Documents

Reply Brief — United States Department of Energy v. Ohio

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1991

Although Congress intended generally ‘“‘to conform” the CWA provision “with a comparable pro- vision in the Clean Air Act,” H.R. Conf. Rep. … No. 830, 95th Cong., Ist Sess. 93 (1977), the language of the Clean Air Act amendment was not adopted intact, as we noted in our opening brief. See Br. 23.

Opposition — Butler v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980

Petitioner also contends that his innocence is establish- ed by the fact that both Boyd and Cuevas testified that he was clean shaven on the day of the robbery. whereas he “was never clean shaven in … The Assimilative Crimes Act was incorrectly cited as 18 U.S.C. 3 instead of 18 U.S.C. 13.

Appendix — Peabody Coal Co. v. Watt

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1981

Cir. 18 Section 301(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7601 (a) (1) (Supp. … Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.), the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), and other applicable air and water quality laws and reg- ulations and health and safety standards

Transcript of Record — Wisconsin v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1930

This was known as the “Pegged Levy Act”. … There is an element of time in the period of aeration, as well as the amount of air. 1648 The use of more air without an additional aeration period would not do much good.

Petition — Daugherty v. City of Long Beach

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

or we RE RIT Ure goin eens: SE RE tw cleaned the beach going as close as one or two feet of any house. … However, the argument or contention that the crucial period is that five-year period immeidately prior to suit has no merit.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013

National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Comments on 77 Fed. Reg. 30,473 (May 23, 2012), Docket ID No. … Since the inception of the Clean Water Act (““CWA” or “Act”), the U.S.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Eugenia Woodard, Petitioner v. Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 30, 2024

While Woodard was cleaning the men’s restroom at CAPP Electric, an unknown employee allegedly pushed the cleaning cart that Woodard was using to carry cleaning supplies. … PHI Air Med., 610 S.W.3d at 843; SeaBright Ins., 465 S.W.3d at 642 (“The Act ultimately struck a bargain that allows employees to receive a lower, but more certain, recovery than would have been possible

Reply Brief — Alaska v. Southeast Alaska Alaska Conservation Council (No. 07-990)

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2009

Be Bec Ce icecsiniiiainsessehcttassindineendapenaciaivd passim Hearing on Clean Water Act Definition of Fill Before the Subcomm. on Clean Air, Wetlands, and Climate Change of the S. … Water Act Definition of Fill Before the Subcomm. on Clean Air, Wetlands, and Climate Change of the S.

Petitioners Brief — Marek v. Chesny

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1985

enacted July 14, 1955; no amendments B-3 CLEAN AIR ACT, 42 U.S.C. § 7604(d) The court, in issuing any final order in any action brought pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, may award costs of … CLEAN AIR ACT AMENDMENT OF 1970, 42 U.S.C.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Chevron Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. City of Hoboken, New Jersey, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 27, 2023

The Second Circuit rejected the plaintiff ’s argument that the Clean Air Act’s displacement of any remedy under federal common law could “give birth to new state-law claims.” … Although the Clean Air Act displaces any remedy under federal common law, it does not displace the entire source of law altogether. See id. at 95 & n.7; accord United States v. Swiss Am.

Appendix — LaFayette Place Associates v. City of Boston

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1999

See U.C.C. § 2-209, comment 2 (1989). … If within such period (the "Option Period") the Developer shall notify the City that it desires to purchase the rights hereby made available to it then the City shall sell the same (without air rights

Joint Abstract of Record — Wisconsin v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Joint Abstract of Record · 1940

This was known as the “Pegged Levy Act”. … There is an element of time in the period of aeration, as well as the amount of air. 1648 The use of more air without an additional aeration period would not do much good.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dee v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991

Sec. 7602(e) (Clean Air Act) ("person" includes "any agency, department, or instrumentality of the United States and any officer, agent, or employee thereof"), and 42 U.S.C. … Train, 426 U.S. 167 (1976), concerning similar provisions of the 38 a | Clean Air Act, did not require a more expansive reading of RCRA Sec. 6961.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. Campaign Clean Water, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975

CAMPAIGN CLEAN WATER, INC. … The Act Manifests Clear Congressional Intent to Attain Clean Water. The Act is a comprehensive and far-reaching law designed to clean up the Nation’s waters.

Amicus Brief — Atkins v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1978

For example, an amendment proposed this year to the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act would have provided for legis- lative veto provisions over proposed executive branch actions but these provisions … Immigration and Naturalization Service, NO. 77-1702, (th Cir), may not be decided for a lengthy period.

Appendix — Fuhrman & Forster Co. v. Commissioner

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1941

The marketing vear for each com- modity shall be ascertained and prescribed (11) DIB MWE ON ITS FLY AIRS PROT, 2a Cet SA mane Sale ot VES EN Re TS EN NS ela ie PEE NA GEE Bit Hie Uo LRAT Sag Ma … than the average margin was during the period before and after the tax.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Virginia v. Maryland

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1288(f)................0.. 5 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1288(h) .................. 5 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1288(i)................... 5 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C … . § 131 McK 2MA)......... 5,6 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1313(d)(2)............... 5,6 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1313(d4)(B) ......... 6 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. $1313) ..........cc0e. : 6 Clean

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Waste Conversion, Inc. v. Pennsylvania

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990

The people have a right to clean air, pure water, and to the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic and esthetic values of the environment. … The peo- ple have a right to clean air, pure water, and to the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic and asthetic values of the environment.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

Congress intended that citizen suits should supplement, not supplant, duplicate, or disrupt federal or state agency enforcement of the permits under the Clean Water Act. … Whether a citizen suit seeking civil penalties under Section 505 of the Clean Water Act is constitutionally moot under Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment, 118 S.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1973

Linde Air Products, 336 . EEN a alla 16, 17 Hamtlton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Bros. & Co., 240 rr eanae ieee 14 Linde Air Products v. Graver Tank & Mfg. … (6) The coated blanks were then passed through an infrared drying oven maintained at an interior air tempera- ture of 425° F for a period of 20 sec- onds to remove the water and form a dry film