Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.64s
Reply Brief — Util. Air Regulatory Grp. v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-47)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2014
EPA, 529 F.3d 1077 ESS eee eee 10, 12 Statutes: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§7401, et seq. … Reg. 38,044 (Sept. 14, 1989) 0000. 12 INTRODUCTION Section §112(n)(1)(A) of the Clean Air Act (“CAA” or “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §7412(m)(1)(A), requires the U.S.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Texas v. United States Department of Energy
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1985
PPG Industries, Inc., 446 U.S. 578, 586-92 (1980), in which judicial review provision of the Clean Air Act was construed in light of the act’s statutory scheme and legislative history, not of the APA … PPG Industries, Inc., supra (Court did not undertake ripeness analysis in administrative challenge governed by judicial review provisions of Clean Air Act); see also Western Oil and Gas Association
474 U.S. 1008Supplemental Appendix — Faulkner v. Wellman
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Appendix · 1984
air (1910.1000), (1910.133). … The heating systems were changed and designed to provide air movement of 100 cubic feet of air per minute, thus providing a complete air change in a cell in less than four minutes.
468 U.S. 1217Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 29, 2022
Secretary of Air Force, 944 F.2d 1477 (9th Cir. 1991), to argue otherwise is unpersuasive. … However, given the language of the comment, it is not clear that this single footnote creates a mandatory duty to warn.
Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Davis v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1974
One phase of the overhaul called for dismantling and cleaning the ship’s generators with carbon tetrachloride. … It is scarcely more helpful to indulge in the euphemism that the decedent was ‘cleaning’ part of the ship, and to say that it is a traditional duty of seamen to keep their ship clean.
415 U.S. 920Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tsuji v. Hawaii
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999
Imminent Danger 29 C.F.R. 1910.94(vi) Clean air 29 C.F.R. 1630.4 (b), (e), (i) Discrimination Prohibited 29 C.F.R. 1630.9 Not making reasonable accommodations 29 C.F.R. 1630.12 (a), (b) Retaliation … The Respondents exemplify the greatest level of evil, for such an extended period.
526 U.S. 1099Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2008
Air Act (“CAA”) citizen suits threatens the entire electric utility industry by turning over to private parties the function of enforcing the environmental laws. … Instead, respondent asserts that petitioners are merely arguing “for repeal of the Clean Air Act’s citizen-suit provision.” Opp. at 16. This argument is wide of the mark.
Opposition Brief — Quivira Mining Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986
The same conclusion was reached in civil enforcement proceedings under the Clean Water Act. United States v. … '2The court in Ashland cited the Senate Report on the 1972 amend- ments to the Clean Water Act, which stated (S.
474 U.S. 1055Reply Brief — Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers, 138 S. Ct. 43 (2017) (No. 16-1276)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2017
So too in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, 134 S. Ct. 2427 (2014). There, the Court construed the Clean Air Act, which required major emitters of “air pollutants” to acquire certain permits. … The Act defined “air pollutant” as “any air pollution agent or combination of such agents, including any * * * substance or matter which is emitted into or otherwise enters the ambient air.” 42 U.S.C
Opposition Brief — American Mining Mining Congress Congress v. Thomas (Nos. 85-1280, 85-1279)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985
under the Act (No. 85-1279). 2. … The amount of radon gas released into the air remains constant for many thousands of years—essentially indefinitely.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
in headwaters streams and thus potentially affected by restrictions on Clean Water Act jurisdiction). … If Adopted, Petitioners’ Arguments Threaten to Disrupt the Clean Water Act’s Coopera- tive Federalism Scheme and Unduly Burden the States. | The Clean Water Act, as originally drafted and subse- quently
546 U.S. 932Opposition Brief — Chevron Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. City of Hoboken, New Jersey, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Mar 31, 2023
Air Act. … Air Act viability of state-law claims.”
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — James G. Connell, III, Petitioner v. Central Intelligence Agency
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 4, 2024
Dep’t of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 361 (1976) (quotation marks omitted). … (cleaned up)).
Record and brief — Merchants Refrigerating Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982
Once the grain is dried, it is cooled and cleaned. Even after the grain has been through these stages, it must still be aerated periodically. … Merchants' comment that the labels may be exchanged goes to its fungibility argument but does not address the bulk requirement of section 38.
456 U.S. 973Respondents Brief — Smith v. Hall
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1937
Sec. 5403, Act of March 4, 1909. ’ Certainly, that violation was not of advantage to any one but Petitioner, as against the general pubiic. … - JUDGE MANTON’S COMMENT.
301 U.S. 216Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · May 1, 2024
Does the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., or the defunct federal common law that it displaced, or national foreign policy, or the Constitution’s structure generally, preempt state common-law causes … The Clean Air Act Does Not Preempt Respondents’ Claims............................. 24 C.
Respondents Brief — Sunoco LP, et al., Petitioners v. City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · May 1, 2024
Does the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., or the defunct federal common law that it displaced, or national foreign policy, or the Constitution’s structure generally, preempt state common-law causes … The Clean Air Act Does Not Preempt Respondents’ Claims............................. 24 C.
Supreme Court brief · Brief in Opposition to Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1967
Unfair University Cleaning’ Company is an unfair cleaner. University Cleaning Company .does not meet the union standards. Ae Lewis Shepard Products Inc. … (ii) to threaten, coerce, or - restrain any person engaged 15 a ‘Guia to vidkcit and by picketing United Air- lines (United) and the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company (A ’& P), with an object
389 U.S. 856Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Pozsgai v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990
U.S.C. §§ 7413(c)1XC), 7412 (ch 1)(B) and 7412(e)(5)) and of 40 CFR § 61.146, and Fabiani with two counts of same Clean Air Act violations. 11/4/85: Vileisis pled guilty to one count superseding … information filed same date charg- ing failure to remove asbestos prior to com- mencement of demolition in violation of Clean Air Act, Secs. 113(c)1)(C), 112(c)1)(B) and 112(e(5) [42 U.S.C. §§ 7413
498 U.S. 812Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 10, 2026
The California statute imposed higher clean up standards and costs on the government than the clean-up standards and costs imposed by federal law. … both heating and air conditioning equipment that can be adjusted by room or area.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.