Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.75s
Reply Brief — United States Department of Energy v. Ohio
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1991
Although ongress intended generally “to conform” the CWA provision “with a comparable pro- vision in the Clean Air Act,” H.R. Conf. Rep. … No. 830, 95th Cong., Ist Sess. 93 (1977), the language of the Clean Air Act amendment was not adopted intact, as we noted in our opening brief. See Br. 23.
500 U.S. 951Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hollingsworth v. Lane Community College
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001
air, clean water, child care, toxins, pesticides, and stream walks. … By aiming to gut the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air act, and many other health reforms (not to mention student loans and welfare assistance), the “Contract” leaves students
532 U.S. 941Petition for Writ of Certiorari — American Airlines Group Inc., Petitioner v. United States, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 27, 2025
A slot is authorization from the FAA to land or take off during a particular period of time. Slot control enables the FAA to regulate air traffic in certain congested, high-demand areas. … The Clean Team did not run that alternative through American’s proprietary tool.
Appendix — Christopher v. North Carolina State University (No. 08-834)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2008
CAMPUS VISIT AND TOUR Interview Comments Mission. … When she returned with her father, he opened the air conditioning unit and attempted to clean the green growth inside.
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · May 22, 2026
The agency must “consider substantive comments timely submitted during the public comment period” and respond to these comments in the final EIS. Id. § 1503.4(a); see also id. § 1502.9(c). … During the public comment period, Guam EPA received significant comments that warrant this Agency to address before making a final decision on the completeness and technical aspects of the permit renewal
Reply Brief — Nat'l Ass'n of Mfrs. v. Dep't of Def., 137 S. Ct. 811 (2017) (No. 16-299)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2017
PPG Industries, 446 U.S. 578 (1980), which addressed the Clean Air Act’s jurisdictional provi- sion. U.S. Br. 49. … Section 1369(b)(1), however, is far narrower than the Clean Air Act’s similar provi- sion. Whether it reaches the Rule is—at the least— debatable.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1980
Acme Tank Cleaning Process Corp., 86 F.2d 727 (2d Cir. 1936) (“[t]o let the Ta 7. … changes have been fully processed under the Act’s mandatory procedures through the thirty day “cool- ing-off” period?
Opposition — Train v. District of Columbia
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1976
Train, No. 75-1050. 3The Clean Air Act Amendments, 42 U.S.C. 1857h(d) provides that the District is a “state.” 4The pertinent regulatory requirements challenged are set forth in full in the Appendix … In view of the prolonged delays that have ayisen in the implementation of the clean air program nationally, it is 5 District of Columbia v. Train, —— US. App. D.C. ——, 521 F.2d at 904. 6 Art.
426 U.S. 904Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2003
This room shall be provided with at least 10 air changes per hour with all air continuously exhausted to the outside. A-118 . … The area shall be arranged to prevent cross traffic of clean and dirty material. Air flow in this area shall be from the “clean” area toward the “dirty” area. .
538 U.S. 1008Amicus Curiae Brief — Bennett v. Spear
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1344; issuance of other permits under the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§1251-1387; and the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§7401-7671q; and, the provision of federal flood insurance. … The Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§1251-1387, Clean Air Act 42 U.S.C. §§7401-7671(q), and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §§6901-6992(k), all contain broadly worded citi- zen suit provisions
520 U.S. 154Petitioners Brief — States Marine Corp. v. Aaby
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1950
Comment is also made on the fact that the shaft was scrapped. … The oil tank was also cleaned (Hertzberg R. 61).
340 U.S. 829Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Schneider v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995
period. … On 1/5/90, clean mastoid bowl, healing well, 20% perforation of the tympanic membrane.
513 U.S. 1077Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Gerke Excavating, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006
This is a 159-day period, 5% of which is 8 days. … See 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act provision mandating notice, comment and consideration in agency rule making). See also Reno v.
548 U.S. 901Amicus Brief — Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1984
In the Clean Air Act Amendments of that year Congress took pains to expressly empower states to regu- late airborne radiation. 42 U.S.C. §§ 18 7416, 7422(c). … The Clean Air Act and its legislative his- tory expressly state that state power to regulate airborne radioactive pollutants is not to be preempted.
464 U.S. 238Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hercules Inc. Inc. v. United States (Nos. 06-865, 06-1014, 06-853)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006
Commentators have expressed the same view. … Comment b.
Amicus Curiae Brief — American Petroleum Institute, et al., Petitioners v. Minnesota
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 21, 2023
The federal judiciary has long understood the need for federal resolution of these cases—even before statutory interventions like the Clean Air Act of 1963. … Some courts have resisted this conclusion, reasoning that federal common law governing interstate emissions is “obsolete” after the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act.
Transcript of Record — Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Butte & Superior Mining Co.
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1919
the filter in a clean and dry state. … We treated during that period 22,536 tons. Q 41.
250 U.S. 336Amicus Curiae Brief — Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000-Coasta! … , Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 — Sierra Nevada-Cascade Mountain Region) § 5096.350 (West Supp. 2000.)
531 U.S. 159Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Chrysler v. Cotter Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2000
the Department projected the clean-up would not be completed until 2012.’ … of operation; and what period of time Cotter acted negligently toward each plaintiff.
531 U.S. 825Reply Brief — New York, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 2, 2018
See Utility Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 134 S. Ct. 2427, 2439 (2014). … Ct. 2699, 2707-08 (2015) (interpreting Clean Air Act provision as requiring EPA to consider economic costs).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.