Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.17s
Amicus Brief — Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981
See, e.g., Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U. S. C. §§ 7401-7642; Clean Water Act Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U. S. … air and clean water held in common by all people.
453 U.S. 609Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 28, 2024
The Clean Air Act displaced any federal common law relating to greenhouse gas emissions. … Although the court concludes the Clean Air Act replaces federal common law, this does not help Defendants.
Petitioners Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Dec 13, 2021
Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S. … This result cannot be squared with the text of the Clean Air Act and, accordingly, the D.C.
Amicus Curiae Brief — American Petroleum Institute, et al., Petitioners v. Minnesota
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 21, 2023
Because Congress displaced federal common law with the Clean Air Act, see Am. Elec. Power Co. v. … This case is not about the Clean Air Act’s preemptive scope.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-46)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
As an alternative, Congress provided Section 111 of the Clean Air Act. … Either EPA is an expert in the Clean Air Act or not. EPA cannot have it both ways.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Wills v. Department of the Navy
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990
By retiring two days prior to being fired, WILLS had a right to a clean record. Sole purpose of Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 is to make it easy to get employee out of job. … Knowledge was imparted to agency that WILLS wanted to preserve his clean record by his act of submitting retirement papers two days prior to effective day for removal.
493 U.S. 1023Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
We also work to ensure that courts re- main faithful to the text, structure, and purpose of key federal statutes like the Clean Air Act and, in turn, protect the authority of the elected branches to … plants, referred to in the Clean Air Act ‘Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 37.6, amicus curiae states that no counsel for a party authored this brief in whole or in part, and no party or counsel for
Amicus Curiae Brief — Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 703 (2014) (No. 14-49)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
We also work to ensure that courts re- main faithful to the text, structure, and purpose of key federal statutes like the Clean Air Act and, in turn, protect the authority of the elected branches to … plants, referred to in the Clean Air Act 1Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 37.6, amicus curiae states that no counsel for a party authored this brief in whole or in part, and no party or counsel for
Joint Appendix — Loveday v. Federal Communications Commission
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1983
- > wiwk DPA Analysis of Funding o ‘ne gn to Defeat f 197 "Clean Indoor Air Act ye Proposition 5 (continued dl p.91 Shiffert's Wholesale, Inc. $ 250. … "Clean Indoor Air Act of 1 Proposition 5 (continued) : p.10 Wittners (same as Hans Wittner, Tobacconist) $___100 di $ 11,400 5. p.4 of statement for period ending 6/30/79 (Exhibit © ) Glaser Brothers
464 U.S. 1008Reply Brief — American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Browner
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2000
EPA, RSE IRE EE ORR ee ne Serge 7 Statutes: Clean Air Act § 108(a)(2), ER a ees ee 7 Clean Air Act § 109(b)(1), I ie ln 2,3 Clean Air Act § 110(a)(2), Ee one eee 7 Clean Air Act § 110(aX(2 … Yet, it cannot sustain EPA’s interpretation of the Clean Air Act (“CAA” or “Act”), or the regulations based on it, without considering Lead Industries and holding that it was correctly decided.
530 U.S. 1202Opposition Brief — United States v. Finley Coal Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1974
ee wer +) ae eee eltel OR ae oh 14 ‘Interested persons were afforded a period of 30 days from the date of publication of the notice in which to submit written comments, suggestions, or objections … The period for sub- mitting written comments, suggestions or objee- tions was subsequently extended to September 30, 1970, by a notice published in the Feperat Recister for September 5, 1970 (35 F.R
419 U.S. 1089Petitioners Reply Brief — Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. NRDC
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1983
AEC, 499 F.2d 1069 (D.C, Cir, 1974) ....... ' STATUTES: Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 551, et seq. (1976) Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401, et seg. (Supp. … Clean Air Act, §§ 109, 112, 211, 42 U.S.C. $§ 7409, 7412, 7545 (Supp. IV 1980) ; see Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1, 24-29 (D.C. Cir. 1976); Amoco Oil Co. v. EPA, 501 F.2d 722, 740-41 (D.C.
462 U.S. 87Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. Defenders of Wildlife
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Another example of a statute that could be affected by the Ninth Circuit’s ruling is the federal Clean Air Act (“CAA”) (42 U.S.C. §§ 7401, et seq.). … ” ° To date, 16 Clean Air Act programs have been fully approved by EPA, and the remaining 34 state programs have been approved on an interim basis.
549 U.S. 1105Amicus Curiae Brief — National Ass'n v. Defenders of Wildlife
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Another example of a statute that could be affected by the Ninth Circuit’s ruling is the federal Clean Air Act (“CAA”) (42 U.S.C. §§ 7401, et seg.). … ” * To date, 16 Clean Air Act programs have been fully approved by EPA, and the remaining 34 state programs have been approved on an interim basis.
551 U.S. 644Reply Brief — Texas, et al., Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 22, 2021
Ass’n’s Clean Air Project v. E.P.A., 752 F.3d 999 (D.C. Cir. 2014) ................................. 9, 10 S. Pac. Transp. Co. v. … For example, in National Environmental Development Ass’n’s Clean Air Project v. E.P.A., the D.C.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tidewater Marine Service, Inc. v. Aubry
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991
A-6 typically work 12 hour shifts, alternating with 12 hour rest periods. Mr. Clean III crew members are transported to the vessel by helicopter from the Santa Barbara Air- port. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 96 n.14 (1983).
502 U.S. 1002Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Maine People's Alliance (No. 06-1540)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007
of a 90-day waiting period. … (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941, 96 S.Ct. 2662, 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976)(construing the term “will en- danger” as used in the Clean Air Act); Reserve Mining Company v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026
Code § 21080.44(b)(1)(A) .................................................14 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7671q...............4, 22 U.S. Const. art. … The Clean Air Act’s war on smog stands as proof that environmental protection and economic opportunity for communities of color need not be in conflict.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Andrew U. D. Straw, Petitioner v. United States, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 30, 2017
The court is not persuaded by these comments as the Plaintiffs did not pursue any recourse with the court during the period of discovery on the Feres doctrine and the discretionary function exception. … No. [70]. 149 Id. at4a(3). 150 The Plaintiffs specifically disavow any reliance on the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation Recovery Act ("RCRA") or Suggested No Adverse Response Levels ("SNARLS
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 22, 2020
Clean Air Task Force & NAACP, Fumes Across the FenceLine 4 (Nov. 2017) (hereinafter, “Fumes Across the Fence-Line”). … In one recent study, the Clean Air Task Force and NAACP found that “[p]eople of color and low-income communities are disproportionately affected by exposure to air pollution” and that “African Americans
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.