Documents

Motion — National Solid Waste Management Ass'n v. Williams

Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1998

For example, air emissions from MSWLFs are regulated under stringent guidelines established pursuant to the Clean Air Act. 40C.F.R. Part 60. … Leachate produced by MSWLFs must be treated or utilized according to Part258 or Clean Water Act regulations.

Brief for the Petitioner — Railway Clerks v. Association for Benefit of Noncontract Employees

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Petitioner · 1965

—_——— growth of the airline industry during this period, as. f? … For a brief period after it was created, the Mediation Board followed the same policy. Adiinis- ".: Gration of the Railway Labor Act by the National Mediation Board, 1934-1957 (1958), p. 16.

Reply Brief — Beame v. Friends of the Earth

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1977

AIR, INC., COMMITTEE FOR BETTER TRANSIT, INC., HARLEM VALLEY TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION, INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, NYC CLEAN AIR CAMPAIGN, NEW YORK STATE TRANS- PORTATION COUNCIL, NORTH … Air Act (42 U.S.C. §1857c-5) provides that "“[e]ach State shall...submit to the Administrator ¥On August 5, 1977, Mr.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Village of Los Ranchos de Albuquerque v. Stone

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992

Throughout the comment period, the plaintiffs repeatedly requested that the Corps take the position that the FEIS developed by the FHWA was inad- equate and additionally requested that a new or supple … Because of this, they are speci- fically protected by § 404 of the Clean Water Act.

Reply Brief — Ohio, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Sep 23, 2024

Circuit is likely the only court that will confront the Question Presented as applied to the Clean Air Act, the Court should grant review now. Pet.34. … Ohio believes that the Clean Air Act’s favoring California lets California enforce its voters’ preferences about balancing environmental and economic values—not Ohioan’s.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

Auth., A Ee ee 14, 15 RULES AND STATUTES Clean Water Act, A Seen eee 14 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 ch. 676, § 2, 52 Stat. 1060 (1938) ..............cccccccesseeeeceeeeees 16 Fair Labor … Nov. 4, 1986) (Clean Air case removing economic benefits of non-compliance); Chesapeake Bay Found. v. Gwaltney, 611 F. Supp. 1542, 1558 (E.D. Va. 1985) (same, under Clean Water Act).

Opposition — Bossard v. Exxon Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978

Ariz. rSEsy- 10 Thus, as one commentator has recent- ly noted: The Act, as amended, takes care to impose primary responsibility for the safe conduct of the work upon the stevedore-employer, preserve … Seaboard Air Line R.R. Co., 222 F.2d 57, 59 (4th Cir. 1955).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 4, 2020

., the Clean Air Act spoke directly “to emissions of carbon dioxide from the defendants’ plants.” … It stated that those “foreign emissions are outside of the EPA and Clean Air Acts’ reach.” Id.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Union Oil Co. of California

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

Environmental Protection Agency, THE BENEFITS AND COSTS OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT, 1970T0 1990 ....6 U.S. … A typical clean-air environmental regulation which provides that only x grams per mile of nitrogen oxides (a precursor to smog formation), see, e.g., Clean Air Act § 202 Table G, 42 U.S.C. § 7521 Table

Reply Brief of Petitioner — Presser v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief of Petitioner · 1963

Reibesell over a ‘ period of tme (R 94a). He had no specific knowledge of. the production of documents by Jomt Council 41 (R. 46a). … The Petitioner's main defense was that he was nut guilty of any of the acts chargé against him.

Amicus Curiae Brief — United Haulers Ass'n v. Oneida-Herkimer

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

Spurred by the need to respond to the periodic epidemics; aided by the emergence of vital statistics as a public health tool which demonstrated that dirt, congestion and bad air shortened lives; sensitized … In New York State, the Solid Waste Management Act of 1988 (1988 Act) established requirements for local government planning units to prepare long term (a minimum ten-year planning period) solid waste

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Adis Kovac, et al., Petitioners v. Kash Patel, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 19, 2024

At one point, the Court discussed the “numerous small sources not previously regulated” under the Clean Air Act, such as “large office and residential buildings, hotels, large retail establishments, and … At one point, the Court discussed the “numerous small sources not previously regulated” under the Clean Air Act, such as “large office and residential buildings, hotels, large retail establishments, and

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Peat v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002

No comments were received; but after the public comment period had expired, the State asked Michigan Peat to put its application on hold and develop an environmental site assessment (“ESA”). … Ford Motor Company, 814 F.2d 1099 (6th Cir. 1987) (Refusing to bind the EPA to state court judgment in Clean Air Act case where the EPA was not a party to the state action).

Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 25, 2022

In Whitman, for example, the Court held that plain language of the Clean Air Act did not permit EPA to consider cost in setting ambient air quality standards. See 531 U.S. at 465. … Air Act.

Respondents Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. New York, 127 S. Ct. 2127 (2007) (No. 06-736)

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2007

Air Act’s New Source Review provisions apply. … Air Act emission limitation to which the source is subject.

Amicus Curiae Brief — U.S. Army Corp of Eng'rs v. Hawkes Co., 136 S. Ct. 615 (2015) (No. 15-290)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

Congress did not include any similar limitation in the Clean Water Act. … The Clean Water Act offers no “meaningful” review of Jurisdictional Determinations.

Reply Brief — Gustafson v. City of Lake Angelus

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1996

Lockheed Air Terminal, 411 U.S. 624 (1973) (See Petition at Pages 18, 19). … the air space above all inland waters.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Honeywell International Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Mexichem Fluor Inc., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 26, 2018

The Court Below Disregarded the Plain Text of the Clean Air Act............................................... 17 A. … The Court Below Disregarded the Plain Text of the Clean Air Act.

Appendix — Building & Construction Trades Department v. Martin

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1992

The proposed regulations regarding programs under the National Apprenticeship Act are still under review in the administration, after an extensive public comment period. … Spades; Chipping Hammers; Air Tamp- ers; Vibrators; Power Buggy; Concrete Saw; Power Saw; Sandblaster; Acetylene Burners; Panel Cleaning Machine Ops.; Power Driven Tools; Air Pump; Air Blow Pipe;

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kelli Smith, Petitioner v. United Parcel Service, Incorporated

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 23, 2025

She also testified that other people made sexual or derogatory comments, but she could not recall who made the comments, when or how they were made, or whether they were directed at her. … Dep’t of U.S, Air Force, 512 F.3d 184, 186 (5th Cir. 2007) (citation omitted). 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). 3 Holtzclaw v.