Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

1.25s

  • Petitioners Brief — Hallstrom v. Tillamook County

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1989

    34 Clean Air Amendments of 1970, § 304 (a) and (b), 84 Stat. 1706, 42 U.S.C. § 7604(a) and (b) (1982 GRAD chcducedecacnéeeeseséetsceese 5, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18 Comprehensive Environmental Response, … Carey, 535 F2d 165, 172 (2d Cir. 1976), the Second Circuit said: In enacting § 304 of the 1970 Amendments [to the Clean Air Act], Congress made clear that citizen groups are not to be treated as

    489 U.S. 1077
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Util. Air Regulatory Grp. v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-47)

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2014

    INC. — (202) 789-0086 — WasHincTON, D.C. 20002 QUESTION PRESENTED Emissions from electric utility steam generating units (EGUs) were extensively regulated before the Clean Air Act Amendments in 1990 … on behalf of its members col- lectively in administrative proceedings under the Clean Air Act, and in litigation arising from those proceedings, that affect electric generators.

  • Petitioners Reply Brief — Lead Industries Ass'n v. Environmental Protection Agency

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1980

    Air Act. 1. … Air Act Amendments quoted at pages 15-16 of LIA’s petition (national primary stan- dards ‘‘are not clean air standards’?

    449 U.S. 1042
  • Reply Brief — West Virginia, et al., Applicants v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Aug 23, 2024

    EPA claims nearly absolute discretion for itself in implementing the Clean Air Act. It thinks its discretion is especially broad when a case involves technical questions. … Air] Act expressly recognizes.”

  • Opposition Brief — Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985

    IV, § 1 (Full Faith Oh Ce EE ib. bo % sk 6 nS 05.0 6s Ssdcvivees 8 Anti-Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. 2283 ............ 9 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, 42 U.S.C. … The Commonwealth failed to meet 'The Clean Air Act was amended and recodified in 1977. See Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seg.

    474 U.S. 819
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska v. Southeast Alaska Alaska Conservation Council (No. 07-990)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

    of thousands of miles of streams in the US.5> Discharges from modern mines are regulated by the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, and state solid waste disposal regulations. … Clean Water Act policy.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Erik Leckner, Petitioner v. General Dynamics Information Technology, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 23, 2022

    ii, 6 42 U.S.C. § 7622, Clean Air Act............................................... … 5851; the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (“FWPCA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1367; the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C. § 7622; the Toxic Substances Control Act (“TSCA”), 15 U.S.C. § 2622; the Solid Waste Disposal

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

    The government filed comments objecting to certain terms of the Decree. … In any however, the Decree ra tt : ; He : lk Private citizen suits under the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts were intended to supplement and encourage federal and state enforcement efforts.

    484 U.S. 49
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 25, 2022

    The Clean Air Act authorizes EPA to regulate greenhouse gases as air pollutants as defined under the Act, Massachusetts v. … The Clean Air Act empowers EPA to take regulatory action to protect the public from adverse health effects due to climate change.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Gisbrecht v. Barnhart

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

    Sullivan, 907 F.2d 367 (2d Cir. 1990)..............cceeee0e 7 STATUTES | Pk ELT TRENTON 5 & passim Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1988)4 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7604(d)..... … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 565 (1986) (Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7604(d)). See also Venegas v.

    535 U.S. 789
  • Amicus Brief — Lead Industries Ass'n v. Environmental Protection Agency

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1980

    This goes beyond the intent of the Clean Air Act. I. … This recognition is contained in Section 160 of the Clean Air Act as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 7470.

    449 U.S. 1042
  • Reply Brief — Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2001

    Cir. 1987) (en STATUTES SWI SI iii scciireckacineensnins The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7671q (1994 & Supp. … See Pet. 13, 18 (discussing Clean Air Act §110(k)(5), 42 U.S.C.

    532 U.S. 903
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Work v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991

    . § 82-209, 220, the Arkansas Water and Air Pollution Control Act, the Arkansas Solid Waste Water Act, Ark. Stat. Ann. § 82-1901 and Ark. Stat. … - tory No. 2, that the defendant, Tyson Foods, Inc., violated the Clean Water Act, together with its response to Instruction No. 23, the jury determined that there were 43 violations within the period

    502 U.S. 956
  • Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Sittner v. City of Seattle

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1964

    Such scrap metal is desired by the foundries only if it is thoroughly cleaned. As the metal is cleaned by the burning process, smoke is emitted into the air. … As the metal is cleaned by the burning process, smoke is emitted into the air. a - Ordinance No. 90000 ; is entitled: ‘AN ORDINANCE relating to air pollution, ereat-— ing an air Pollution Control

    377 U.S. 906
  • Joint Appendix — Air & Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVries, 139 S. Ct. 986 (2019) (No. 17-1104)

    Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 2019

    “The cleaning of one’s clothes with com- pressed air is prohibited.” “Compressed Air. … — particularly when compressed air or dry brushing is used to clean out the wear dust from old asbestos brakes.?

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

    Properly interpreted, section 109 of the Clean Air Act is clearly constitutional. … Sunstein, /s The Clean Air Act Unconstitutional? , 98 Mich. L. Rev. 303, 308 (1999).

    531 U.S. 457
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Engine Mfrs. Assn. v. South Coast Air Quality Management Dist.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

    The Clean Air Act Gives States a Pri- mary Role in Controlling Motor Vehicle a, C. … The Clean Air Act (“CAA” or “Act”) places the primary responsibility for meeting the health-based national ambient air quality standards squarely on the States, and imposes heavy penalties if States

    541 U.S. 246
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — SL Service, Inc. v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001

    After consideration of any comments received, the Secretary shall publish a final ruling or decision in the Customs Bulletin within 30 days after the closing of the comment period. … After consideration of any comments received, the Secretary shall publish a final ruling or decision in the Customs Bulletin within 30 days after the closing of the comment period.

    533 U.S. 931
  • Opposition — Davis v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1984

    V) 2671 et seq., for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. (& Supp. V) 1251 et seq., by the United States Air Force at Langley Air Force Base in Virginia. … ” provision in Section 505 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1365.

    466 U.S. 950
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ohio, ex rel. Dave Yost, Attorney General of Ohio, Petitioner v. Rover Pipeline, LLC, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 25, 2025

    That initiates a thirty-day comment period. Id. Ohio then sets hearings for any project for which comments reveal a “significant public interest.” Id. at §6111.30(D). … Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.); or (3) [the Clean Water Act] (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) 15 U.S.C. §717b(d).

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.