Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Burlington v. Dague

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

Case Co., 793 F.2d 909 oe | re 15 Statutes: Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VT ........... 18 Clean Air Act § 304(d), 42 U.S.C. § 7604(d) .. 2... 2... 7 - h. ££. wevrerecrr: 3 33 U.S.C. § 1365 … (RCRA) and the Clean Water Act, respec- tively.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

Congress responded in a highly detailed manner to the potential problems created by the warranties mandated by the Clean Air Act . … Congress also established a requirement in the 1990 amend- ments to the Clean Air Act that motor vehicles be equipped with electronic diagnostic devices.

Petition — Clean Land Air Water Corp. v. Waste Systems, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

B-78-526-CA ) CLEAN LAND AIR WATER ) CORPORATION AND ROLLINS ) ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ) ORDER On this date came on for consideration the Motion by Defendants, Clean Land Air Water Corporation … Steger 19 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 80-1459 In Re: CLEAN LAND AIR WATER CORPORATION, Petitioner.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

Alaska, 540 U.S. at 485 n.12 (discussing similar Clean Air Act provisions); David M. … This Court has implicitly held that Congress made such value choices in the Clean Air Act and the Endangered Species Act. See TVA v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Michael Sackett, et ux., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 17, 2022

Applying this standard, this Court has upheld challenged delegations made pursuant to the Clean Air Act, see Whitman v. Am. … Id. at 325. 11 Building on this reasoning in the context of the Clean Air Act, in American Electric Power Co. v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hercules Inc. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995

June 9, 1988) (§ 707 immunity does not apply to liability under the Clean Air Act). … Costs to clean up environmexal contamina- tion caused in prior years will generally be period costs.

Petition — California v. Trombetta

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984

In the prescribed opera- tion of the device, clean air is first tested, then the breath of the subject. … After each test, the chamber is purged with clean air and then checked for a reading of zero alcohol. (See People v. Miller (1975) 52 Cal.App.3d 666, 668-669.)

Record and brief — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center

Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 2013

In applying what the State calls the “near- identical” provision of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. … Delaware Valley Citizens Council for Clean Air v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Pozsgai v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

SCM Corp., 667 F.Supp. 1110, 1128 (D.Md. 1987) (assessing sequential Clean Air Act violations at $10,000 per day). … Insofar as many Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act discharge violations involve dozens or even hundreds of days of effluent or air emis- sion releases, increase of the penalty will be applicable in

Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. Campaign Clean Water, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975

States and local governments had strongly pro- tested against the congressional imposition upon them of rigorous air quality standards under the Clean Air Act and Amendments of 1970 because the federal … Lockheed Air Terminal, 411 U.S. 624, 637 (1973).

Opposition Brief — Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Sep 9, 2024

Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. … Congress enacted the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., “to protect and enhance the quality of the Nation’s air resources so as to promote the public health and welfare and the productive

Petitioners Reply Brief — Save The Valley, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1983

Petitioner was forced to raise its clean air complaints in the Clean Water Act con- text because of the government’s concededly improper at- tempt to impose air pollution controls in an environmental … Air Act.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — W.R. Grace & Co. v. United States (No. 05-1363)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006

See id. at 496-97 (applying arbitrary and capricious review to the EPA’s taken actions under the Clean Air Act); see also 5 U.S.C. § 706(2) (applying arbitrary and capricious review to agency conclusions … Conservation, 540 U.S. at 485-88 (EPA “rationally construed” Clean Air Act in internal guidance memoranda, which construction deserved “respect and approbation” but not Chevron deference).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 27, 2018

The DOH says that, after receiving comments from Plaintiffs’ counsel, the County, and the EPA, it will revise the draft permit if appropriate and proceed to notice and a thirty-day public comment period … Plaintiffs ask this court to determine the maximum possible number of the County’s violations of the Clean Water Act by counting the number of days within the limitations period that effluent from each

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — VGS Corp. v. United States Department of Energy

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987

During this period, DOE proposed, and thereafter adopted, regulations calling for an additional “clean-up” entitlements notice implementing exception or- ders relating to the pre-decontrol period. 10 … Army and Air Force Exchange Service, 619 F.2d 1132 (5th Cir. 1980). There is no doubt that Southland has a clear right to the relief requested and that DOE has a clear duty to act.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Telegraph Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987

by the agency, had truly been substan- tial and had furthered the goals of the Clean Air Act. 103 S.Ct. at 3290. … Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7607(f), involved in Ruckelshaus.

Reply Brief — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2007

As part of its activities, NPCA is a plaintiff in two Clean Air Act citizen suits against the Tennessee Valley Authority alleging the same type of violations at issue in this case. Nat’! Parks v. … (a precursor to fine particle pollution),’ OCE has joined NPCA as a plaintiff in the Clean Air Act citizen suit in Tennessee. Nat'l Parks v. TVA, Case No. 05-6329 (6" Cir.) (currently pending).

Petitioners Reply Brief — Union Carbide Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1984

SE Oe ae eta 3 Statutes and Rules: Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 551 et EEE Es Se ER eT irc te ER a ED Me 8 Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7626: Section 807 (b) (1), 42 U.S.C … Section 807(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7607 (b) (1). ® The dissent by Judge Wilkey more faithfully reflects this Court’s prior rulings in System Federation No. 91 v.

Appellants Brief — Exxon Corp. v. Hunt

Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1986

. § 4661 et seq. 2 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1321 3 Airport Development Acceleration Act of 1973, 49 U.S.C. § 1513 (a) 19 New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act, N.J.S.A. 58 :10-23.11 et … Delta Air Lines, Inc., supra, 463 U.S. at 95.

Appendix — National-Southwire Aluminum Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1988

Approval Criteria for New Emission Limit Under §111{d) of the Clean Air Act and Subpart B of 40 CFR Part 60, states are required to develop plans for controlling designated pollutants from designated … Because €111(d) of the Clean Air Act does not establish any ambient standards, the 61a modeling performed by NSA is legally irrelevant.