Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.29s
Amicus Brief — Train v. City of New York
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1975
Failure to comply with the sixty-day limit in the Clean Air Act was the subject of Riverside v. Ruckelshaus, 4 ERC 1728 (C. D. … Air Act.
420 U.S. 35Amicus Curiae Brief — Air Pollution Variance Bd. of Colo. v. Western Alfalfa Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974
Supp.) ........ 17 OTHER AUTHORITIES Air Pollution Control Act of the State of Colorado... 6 Federal Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. … The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.
416 U.S. 861Amicus Curiae Brief — Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
GER Bees cccccocectecesosnennel 14 United States Constitution BUDE ccovcceceeseeesscssnnnne 7 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(d).............. a Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1365.............. 9 — Page … Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(d), and in the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1365.
497 U.S. 871Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Aug 23, 2024
Understandably so, for that theory was at war with the Clean Air Act’s text (the statute permits only “achievable” standards based on technology that “has been adequately demontrated”), its structure ( … Yet this point was made both during the comment period (which is why EPA addressed it), and in the D.C.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Burlington v. Dague
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Delaware Valley Citizens Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 562 n.6 (1986) (Delaware Valley I). … . ®* These statutes include, inter alia, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(k); the Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. 1988: the Clean Air Act, 42
505 U.S. 557Reply Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 17, 2022
Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S. … For North Dakota, charged by its own laws and the Clean Air Act to regulate air emissions from existing sources, the D.C. Circuit’s decision was anything but “hypothetical.” Id. at 447.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
. § 1314 (D)(2) ooo. cece cceececcecescececceneceueeees ) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4332(B) ..000..00 00. cece. 10 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7411(a)Q1) ooo. iS) 1 A Legislative … American Trucking Ass’ns, 531 U.S. 457, 467 (2001) (Clean Air Act of 1970 prohibits weighing costs against benefits in promulgation of national ambient air quality standards): Tenn.
556 U.S. 208Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
UE aR, SE UIE... © GRBIED .nccc cscs ceneccccessccsscccecesce 10 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7411 (a)Q1) ooo. eee ) 1 A Legislative History of the Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of Re es … American Trucking Ass‘ns, 531 U.S. 457, 467 (2001) (Clean Air Act of 1970 prohibits weighing costs against benefits in promulgation of national ambient air quality standards); Tenn.
Brief for the US in Opposition — White v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the US in Opposition · 1958
On the’ dress.in-the package was a cleaning . ticket marked “Fiel” and followed by some numbers (R. 51). … The court noted’ - (239 F. 2d at 823) that: “Provision has, since this Act, been maue.for air parcel-post service, 62 Stat. 1097, 39 U.S.C.A: $ 475, but this was done by sepa- rate Act, making the
358 U.S. 829Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 13, 2018
In one instance, the air conditioning stopped working fully for a period of up to two days. App. 20a. It was August—in Florida—and Saunders’s cell had eight inmates crammed inside. … Wilson, 311 F.3d 1340, 1346 (11th Cir. 2002).2 2 Defendants were acting within their discretionary authority during the relevant time period as employees of the Jail. 51a Once a defendant shows that
Amicus Curiae Brief — Oklahoma, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 24, 2025
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Clean Air Act. … See Administrative Conference of the United States, Recommendation 76-4: Judicial Review Under the Clean Air Act and Federal Water Pollution Control Act (1976), in Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977: Hr’
Appellees Brief — Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1981
quality control requirements under the Clean Air Act, were in violation of the principles of feder- alism embodied in the Tenth Amendment. … As has been seen, there are currently in effect various federal programs for dealing with air and water quality under the Clean Air Act and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972.
452 U.S. 264Brief for Respondent — Air Pollution Variance Bd. of Colo. v. Western Alfalfa Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1974
Contemporaneous notice as found in the Clean Air Act would hcwever permit Re- spondent and others in its position to observe simultane- ously with the inspector or immediately thereafter. … pollution statutes Other than the Clean Air Act.
416 U.S. 861Petition for Writ of Certiorari — The Tungus v. Skovgaard
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1959
It must be _ noted, however, that the Sixth Circuit commented that the Tennessee Act allowed recovery only for. negligence.. _ To the extent that Graham v. A.. Lusi, Limited, 206 F. 2d: 223 (C. … Besides this, an open — door and an open skylight led to the air.
358 U.S. 588Supreme Court brief · Application · Oct 17, 2019
,” i.e., the Clean Air Act spoke directly “to emissions of carbon dioxide from the defendants’ plants.” … It stated that those “foreign emissions are outside of the EPA and Clean Air Acts’ reach.” Id.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Goodner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993
Goodner, Jr., for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 to 1387, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901 to 6991i, and the Compre- hensive Environmental … App. 11 The court may change the conditions of probation, reduce or extend the period of probation, and at any time during the probation period or within the maximum probation period of 5 years permitted
506 U.S. 1049Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 11, 2021
Holding that the Clean Air Act displaces the federal common law that would otherwise govern respondents’ claims would only strengthen the case for federal jurisdiction. … In so holding, the Ninth Circuit concluded that the Clean Air Act displaced federal public nuisance claims based on emissions contributing to global warming. Pet. App. 13a.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
(Energy Policy and RR Oe ees x 42 U.S.C. § 7604(d) (Clean Air Act Amendments ere a ate eR ta. 42 U.S.C. § 7607(f) (Clean Air Act Amendments ae 4, eee baa S81 ee ee ee & 42 U.S.C. § 8435 (Powerplant … § 1988") (applying the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C.
510 U.S. 517Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Mar 27, 2019
Water Act’s requirements by failing to act “within a reasonable period of time (which shall not exceed one year).” 33 U.S.C. § 1341(a)(1). … McCarthy, 1 The other two statutes are the Coastal Zone Management Act and the Clean Air Act. See 15 U.S.C. § 717b(d). 2 525 F.3d 141, 143-44 (2d Cir. 2008); 15 U.S.C. § 717b(d)(3).
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Nov 10, 2025
The EPA recognized that this could significantly affect the preemption arguments raised in this case, soliciting “comment on the continued preemptive effect of the [Clean Air Act] in the event that the … The Clean Air Act Does Not Preempt Respondents’ Claims.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.