Documents

Petitioners Brief — United States Gypsum Co. v. Galeota

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1942

Statement of Case The plaintiff’s proof as to defendant’s negligence was limited by the application of the New York State Statute of Limitations (New York Civil Practice Act, Section 49) to a period … The plaintiff’s proof of the defendant’s negligence was limited by the New York Statute of Limitations (Civil Practice Act, Section 49) to a period of three years prior to the bringing of this action

Petitioners Brief — Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1998

1 Clean Water Act, BD BG. © BeBe ccccccccccccccccccsnes 15, 19, 22, 31 Resource Conservation and Recov Act, GB He © Getic ccc cccccccccceccescces 15, 19, 26, 29 Clean Air Act, GB BR © Pie O ccc … The Clean Air Act citizen suit provision is not intended to be a windfall for plaintiffs. Rather it is intended to encourage and enforce compliance with environmental regulations.”

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — CropLife America v. Baykeeper

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2010

Clean Water Act and the FIFRA. … Respond to comments and develop Administrative record At the close of the comment period on the proposed general permit, the work group must review the comments to determine whether appropriate changes

Opposition — Selco Supply Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981

II) 7607(b) (60-day period under the Clean Air Act); 33 U.S.C. 1369 (90-day period under the Clean Water Act). … In interpreting the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, the courts uniformly have held that the time limit bars late filings. Sun Enterprises Ltd. v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bragdon v. Abbott

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

Agency Comments GAO did not obtain official agency comments on this report. … ~ Lares handpieces were brush-scrubbed in running water, rinsed, dried, and cleaned and lubricated from the base with Lares Handpiece Conditioner. They were run 60 seconds with air and water.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. Campaign Clean Water, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975

CAMPAIGN CLEAN WATER, INC AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF THE STATES OF TEXAS. … But the true magnitude of the damage cannot be assessed until what has been withheld is contrasted with what the States really need to meet the clean water goals of the Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. City of New York

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975

vs. “ CAMPAIGN CLEAN WATER, INC. … But the true magnitude of the damage cannot be assessed until what has been withheld is contrasted with what the States really need to meet the clean water goals of the Act.

Joint Appendix — Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1983

, Office of Legislation Walter Barber, Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards The inquiries will be limited to (1) the identity of partici- pants in post-comment period conversations … Cf. §307(d)(8) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7607(d)(8) (“the court may invalidate the rule only if the errors were so serious and related to matters of such central relevance to the rule that there

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — MPM Contractors, Inc. v. Department of Health & Environment of Kansas

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990

Not less than 24 hours after this cleanup, an air stream from a high speed leaf blower or equivalent device shall be swept across all clean surfaces for a period of not less than five minutes for each … a lower air pressure than the air outside of the bag.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Action League League v. Department of Transportation (No. 06-988)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006

CLEAN WATER ACT 34. … ” under the Clean Air Act. 66 Fed.

Emergency Application — North Dakota, et al., Applicants v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Aug 16, 2024

As proposed, the Proposed Rule plainly exceeds EPA’s authority under the Clean Air Act. … Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducted in accordance with section 112(d)(6) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) to identify developments in practices, processes, and control technologies applicable to

Reply Brief — American Lung Ass'n v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1999

Garland Independent School District, 489 U.S. 782 (1989) ..............66. 7 STATUTES: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 ef seq.: & TiXs), 42 USC. & FO ie ee 8 § SO/(G), 42 U.S.C. | FOR Ss vigss … The decisionmaking scheme enacted for setting NAAQS under the Clean Air Act is no different.

Amicus Curiae Brief — U.S. Army Corp of Eng'rs v. Hawkes Co., 136 S. Ct. 615 (2015) (No. 15-290)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

§ 6928(d), (g) (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act); 42 U.S.C. § 7413(b(c) (Clean Air Act); 42 U.S.C. §§ 9603(b), 9609(c) (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compen- sation, and Liability Act … and preliminary construction of the facility, and this depended on interpeting Section 111(a)(2) of the Clean Air Act as it applied to the particular facts.

Amicus Brief — Alabama Power Co. v. Sierra Club

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1984

Introduction Section 123 of the Clean Air Act“ requires the states to use good engineering practice (GEP) stack height assump- tions when establishing emissions limitations under Section 110 of the … Air Act.

Amicus Brief — Train v. City of New York

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1975

Failure to comply with the sixty-day limit in the Clean Air Act was the subject of Riverside v. Ruckelshaus, 4 ERC 1728 (C. D. … Air Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al., Petitioners v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026

Agency, Clean Air Act Requirements and History, https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-actoverview/clean-air-act-requirements-and-history (last visited May 20, 2026) ..................................... 9 U.S. … Agency, Clean Air Act Requirements and History, https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/cleanair-act-requirements-and-history (last visited May 20, 2026). 10 II.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

GER Bees cccccocectecesosnennel 14 United States Constitution BUDE ccovcceceeseeesscssnnnne 7 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(d).............. a Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1365.............. 9 — Page … Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(d), and in the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1365.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Burlington v. Dague

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

Delaware Valley Citizens Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 562 n.6 (1986) (Delaware Valley I). … . ®* These statutes include, inter alia, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(k); the Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. 1988: the Clean Air Act, 42

Reply Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 17, 2022

Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S. … For North Dakota, charged by its own laws and the Clean Air Act to regulate air emissions from existing sources, the D.C. Circuit’s decision was anything but “hypothetical.” Id. at 447.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

. § 1314 (D)(2) ooo. cece cceececcecescececceneceueeees ) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4332(B) ..000..00 00. cece. 10 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7411(a)Q1) ooo. iS) 1 A Legislative … American Trucking Ass’ns, 531 U.S. 457, 467 (2001) (Clean Air Act of 1970 prohibits weighing costs against benefits in promulgation of national ambient air quality standards): Tenn.