Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.35s
Appendix F — City of Santa Clarita, California v. Los Angeles County, California (No. 05-1462)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix F · 2006
The Federal Decisions Do Not Preempt CEQA orSMARA But Rather Mandate Ne Ss SA ile wea aise 8 8's The Federal Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act Mandate Compliance With NN eh Wie ees Ak 45700 4 $8 © … The Federal Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act Mandate Comp- liance With CEQA It is undisputed that the federal Clean Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., and federal Clean Water Act (“CWA”),
Amicus Curiae Brief — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Sierra Club, 463 U.S. 680, 684 (1983) (Clean Air Act). … Most recently, it was applied to this case arising under the Clean Water Act.
528 U.S. 167Amicus Curiae Brief — Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
Air Act and Clean Water Act (July 8, 1980), Env’t Rep. … Air Act.
484 U.S. 49Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2023
Circuit vacated the EPA’s Clean Air Interstate Rule regulating nitrogen oxide (NOx) and sulfur dioxide (SO2). … Assoc.’s Clean Air Project v. EPA, 891 F.3d 1041 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
Opposition — Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Williams
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978
Section 110(a) (1) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C., Section 7410(a) (1) required that these regulations be adopted after notice and public hearing. … EPA under Section 110 of the Clean Air Act and CEI appealed that approval to the Court of Ap- peals. Buckeye Power, Inc. v. EPA, 481 F.2d 162 (6th Cir. 1973).
439 U.S. 865Reply Brief — Mont. Power Co. v. U.S.E.P.A.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1977
Subse- quent to the filing of petitioners’ briefs on the merits on or before May 19, 1977, amendments to the Clean Air Act were enacted. Pub. … Whether regulations promulgated by the En- vironmental Protection Agency to prevent the significant deterioration of air quality are au- thorized by the Clean Air Act. 2.
430 U.S. 953Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Malot v. Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996
The process involves applying a vacuum to the top of one or more well casings to the zone of the earth to be cleaned; the vacuum must be capable of drawing air through that zone and of converting the … Concentrations of vapors from the pilot well began to increase over this period of time.
516 U.S. 1117Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Atlas Corp. v. United States, 111 S. Ct. 46 (1990) (No. 89-1705)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990
For instance, the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. $ 7401, et seq., provides for national standards on the level of air pollutants. The act provides penalties for noncompliance. 42 U.S.C. § 7413. … ee a Tee 4la clear’s theory, those required to comply with the Clean Air Act standards would have to be compensated for a constitutional taking because the costs of compliance may be high."
Reply Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. Coalition for Clean Air
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1993
COALITION FoR CLEAN AIR, ET AL. … As we explain in the petition (Pet. 16-17), the court of appeals’ interpretation of the Clean Air Act is illogical.
507 U.S. 950Transcript of Record — United States v. Idaho
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1936
We have compressed air in the mine. It is then the intention to clean up the caves on the Progressive, south. … I want to comment’ on the identity of this so-called 161 Progressive seam. The Horseshoe seam, as has been stated, has been said to be a clean seam of coal, without parting.
298 U.S. 105Opposition Brief — Communities, Inc. v. Busey
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1992
The comment period ended July 9, 1990. … This is being rejected as tco restrictive on air- port demands and capacity when it occurs during a peak traffic period.
506 U.S. 953Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2009
to specified federal actions under the Clean Water Act. 1 Leg. … Pozsgai, 999 F.2d 719, 729 (3d Cir. 1993) (giving deference to Army Corps of Engineers interpretation of Clean Water Act because, “[lJike the Clean Air Act in Chevron, the Clean Water Act addresses
Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Aug 16, 2024
App.518 APPENDIX G APPENDIX COMMENTS OF TALEN MONTANA, LLC ON THE PROPOSAL ON NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS: COAL- AND OIL-FIRED ELECTRIC UTILITY STEAM GENERATING UNITS REVIEW … See e.g., Utility Air Regulatory Group v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — CropLife America v. Baykeeper
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2010
In fact, this was exactly the error that this Court reversed in Chevron, rejecting an appellate court's attempt to invoke the general “purpose of the (Clean Air Act} permit program ... to improve air … the Clean Water Act and the FIFRA.
559 U.S. 936Amicus Curiae Brief — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Romero-Barcelo, 456 U.S. 305 (1982).......11 STATUTES Clean Air Act, Pub. L. No. 91-604, 84 Stat. 1676 (1970), as amended by Act of Nov 15, 1990, Pub. L. … "In stressing that the Clean Air Act was the model for the citizen suit 17 once, Sea Middlesex, 453 U.S. at 17-18 n.27; Gwaltney, 484 U.S. at 62, the citizen suit provision of the Clean Water Act
528 U.S. 167Amicus Curiae Brief — Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
EPA, 659 F.2d 1349, 1370 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 822 (1982) (strictly enforcing similar sixty (60) day judicial review provision in Clean Air Act). … Resource Con- servation and Recovery Act, as well as the Clean Water Act.
479 U.S. 1084Appendix — Leavitt v. Tennessee Valley Authority
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2004
Air Act and Clean Water Act are not ‘final’ under the APA.” … those found in the Clean Air Act.
541 U.S. 1030Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 30, 2021
Auto Innovators’ members rely on the regulatory certainty provided by the Clean Air Act to implement routine, model-wide updates to vehicles in production and in the field. … The Clean Air Act (“CAA”) gives EPA exclusive authority to regulate these updates.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Section 307(e) provides that nothing in the Clean Air Act authorizes judicial review of EPA regulations or orders, except as provided in §307. 42 U.S.C. §7607(e). … The Clean Air Act expressly exempts enumerated regulations and other final agency action from the APA, 42 U.S.C. §7607(d)(1) (“provisions of section 553 through 557 and section 706 of title 5 shall
549 U.S. 561Amicus Curiae Brief — Soundboard Association, Petitioner v. Federal Trade Commission
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 2, 2019
An agency “acts” when it implements, interprets, or prescribes law or policy. Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. EPA, 801 F.2d 430, 435 (D.C. Cir. 1986) (citing Nat’l Automatic Laundry & Cleaning Council v. … The rule, promulgated after a period of notice and comment, “purport[ed] to give an authoritative interpretation of a statutory provision that [had] a direct effect on the day to day business of [the regulated
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.