Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.96s
Reply Brief — Virginia v. Browner
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1997
AIR ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1990, reprinted in 136 Cong. … Air Act (“CAA”) as ambiguous, EPA’s Brief should lay such concerns to rest.
519 U.S. 1090Amicus Curiae Brief — Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
EPA, 659 F.2d 1349, 1370 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 822 (1982) (strictly enforcing similar sixty (60) day judicial review provision in Clean Air Act). … Resource Con- servation and Recovery Act, as well as the Clean Water Act.
479 U.S. 1084Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Mar 24, 2021
JACOBI Attorneys Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 SupremeCtBriefs@usdoj.gov (202) 514-2217 QUESTION PRESENTED Under the renewable fuel standard program in the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C … III ............................................................... 10 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. ..................................... 3 42 U.S.C. 7545 .....................................
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1997
Water Act, the Clean Air Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. … Water Act, section 112 of the Clean Air Act and section 3001 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
521 U.S. 1103Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 20, 2026
EPA, 156 F.4th 523, 550 (5th Cir. 2025) (finding EPA’s interpretation of the Clean Air Act persuasive because it relied on “scientific knowledge about air pollution patterns and the practicalities of [ … Clean Air Act] enforcement”); United States v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 25, 2022
A key issue in this case is whether the Clean Air Act 5 (“Act”) authorizes regulators to take that approach. … In the debates over the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments, some had suggested that only site-specific “scrubbers” be used to control SO2, in lieu of the Acid Rain Program’s more flexible approach that allows
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 20, 2023
Conde & Michael Buschbacher, The Little Tucker Act’s Statute of Limitations Does Not Govern GardenVariety Pre-enforcement Suits Under the APA, Yale Notice & Comment (Sept. 26, 2023)... 5, 6, 7 John C. … (cleaned up)).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Edison Electric Institute v. Piedmont Environmental Council (No. 09-343)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
Air Act, 74 Fed. … Air Act, 74 Fed.
Amicus Curiae Brief — American Mining Congress v. Thomas
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
. §§ 551 et seq. (1982) ..passim I os eceamnaioesnen 5 SR Nee 5 Clean Water Act, Pub. L. … ” of comments received during the public comment period.
479 U.S. 814Amicus Curiae Brief — Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 703 (2014) (No. 14-49)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
Under the Clean Air Act, Congress intended to focus regulation on the most serious air pollution problems. … Circuit, which had held that the “Good Neighbor Provision” of the Clean Air Act did not allow for consideration of costs.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-46)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
Under the Clean Air Act, Congress intended to focus regulation on the most serious air pollution problems. … Circuit, which had held that the “Good Neighbor Provision” of the Clean Air Act did not allow for consideration of costs.
Transcript of Record — United States v. Idaho
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1936
We have compressed air in the mine. It is then the intention to clean up the caves on the Progressive, south. … I want to comment’ on the identity of this so-called 161 Progressive seam. The Horseshoe seam, as has been stated, has been said to be a clean seam of coal, without parting.
298 U.S. 105Opposition — Town of Orangetown v. Ruckelshaus
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1984
5 U.S.C. §706(2) (A) 22 Clean Water Act 33 U.S.C. §§1251 et seq. 4 33 U.S.C. §1283 20 33 U.S.C. §1284 20 (v) National Bank Act 12 GomeGe National Environmental Policy Act 42 U.S.C … The court cited language from the National Bank Act, which in fact used Similar language to that of the Clean Water Act in referring to the agency decisionmaking.
465 U.S. 1099Reply Brief — Mont. Power Co. v. U.S.E.P.A.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1977
Subse- quent to the filing of petitioners’ briefs on the merits on or before May 19, 1977, amendments to the Clean Air Act were enacted. Pub. … Whether regulations promulgated by the En- vironmental Protection Agency to prevent the significant deterioration of air quality are au- thorized by the Clean Air Act. 2.
430 U.S. 953Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2008
The Alaska Rule states that the frost-free period based on a “28 degree air temperature” best fits the “observed growing season in most parts of [Alaska].” … Whitman, 336 F.3d 1236, 1255-57 (11th Cir. 2003) (reasoning that Clean Air Act complhiance orders have status of law because statute “undeniably authorizes[s} ... penalties based solely upon noncompliance
Respondents Brief — Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-46)
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2014
History of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (Cong. Research Serv. 1993) (“Leg. … The Clean Air Act as a Whole Confirms That EPA’s Interpretation is Reasonable.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2014
History of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (Cong. Research Serv. 1993) (“Leg. … The Clean Air Act as a Whole Confirms That EPA’s Interpretation is Reasonable.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Engine Mfrs. Assn. v. South Coast Air Quality Management Dist.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Congress passed the Clean Air Act (Act) to encourage local efforts to protect public health in this manner. … That observation applies fully to the Clean Air Act.
541 U.S. 246Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
Under the Clean Air Act, Congress intended to focus regulation on the most serious air pollution problems. … Circuit, which had held that the “Good Neighbor Provision” of the Clean Air Act did not allow for consideration of costs.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 28, 2026
This approach is consistent with the requirements of the provisions of the Clean Air Act related to the review of NAAQS and with how the EPA and the courts have historically interpreted the Act. … This approach is consistent with the requirements of the provisions of the Clean Air Act related to the review of NAAQS and with how the EPA and the courts have historically interpreted the Act.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.