Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersagency

922 results

0.57s

  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    On August 24, 1989, DeCastro wrote McWade requesting him to arrange for the Thompsons to receive the balance of their refund. … Commissioner, 114 T.C. 399 (2000), affd. 259 F.3d 881 (7th Cir. 2001), a majority of this Court upheld respondent’s contention that the taxpayers were chargeable with the receipt of gross income on the

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    On August 24, 1989, DeCastro wrote McWade requesting him to arrange for the Thompsons to receive the balance of their refund. … Commissioner, 114 T.C. 399 (2000), affd. 259 F.3d 881 (7th Cir. 2001), a majority of this Court upheld respondent’s contention that the taxpayers were chargeable with the receipt of gross income on the

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    On August 24, 1989, DeCastro wrote McWade requesting him to arrange for the Thompsons to receive the balance of their refund. … Commissioner, 114 T.C. 399 (2000), affd. 259 F.3d 881 (7th Cir. 2001), a majority of this Court upheld respondent’s contention that the taxpayers were chargeable with the receipt of gross income on the

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    On August 24, 1989, DeCastro wrote McWade requesting him to arrange for the Thompsons to receive the balance of their refund. … Commissioner, 114 T.C. 399 (2000), affd. 259 F.3d 881 (7th Cir. 2001), a majority of this Court upheld respondent’s contention that the taxpayers were chargeable with the receipt of gross income on the

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Memo. 1996-399 UNITED STATES TAX COURT PHILIPPE AND NADINE GRELSAMER, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent DAVID E. MORGAN, Petitioner v. … (continued...) 1 - 24 consolidated cases herein, raised issues regarding additions to tax for negligence and valuation overstatement.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Memo. 1996-399 UNITED STATES TAX COURT PHILIPPE AND NADINE GRELSAMER, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent DAVID E. MORGAN, Petitioner v. … (continued...) 1 - 24 consolidated cases herein, raised issues regarding additions to tax for negligence and valuation overstatement.

    United States Tax Court
  • Bulletin No. 2021–38

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    The plan may provide options as to whether some or all of the employees described in § 1.410(b)-6 are excluded, provided that Bulletin No. 2021–38 399 September 20, 2021 the criteria for excluding … SECTION 24.

    Internal Revenue Service
  • Click to navigate to a specific section (2017)

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    insurance and received payment primarily in On February 24, 2017, in Camden, New cash. … Apex Health & Wellness was shuttered on April 24, 2013.

    Internal Revenue Service
  • Conformed to Federal Register version

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    be clearly defined and understood and require firms to be accountable for allocating responsibilities in a way that supports effective oversight and execution, even where responsibilities are divided. 399 … Note: The staff’s analysis is based on 24 audit firms that disclosed their QC evaluation dates in their most recent EU transparency reports.

    Securities and Exchange Commission
  • Conformed to Federal Register version

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    -2; new Instruction 10 to Item 24 of amended Form N-2. … All financial statements omitted from Items 8.6 or 24. p.

    Securities and Exchange Commission
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    On January 24, 1981, Mr. … Sticht on June 24, 1996.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    On January 24, 1981, Mr. … Sticht on June 24, 1996.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    On January 24, 1981, Mr. … Sticht on June 24, 1996.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    On January 24, 1981, Mr. … Sticht on June 24, 1996.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    On January 24, 1981, Mr. … Sticht on June 24, 1996.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    On January 24, 1981, Mr. … Sticht on June 24, 1996.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    On January 24, 1981, Mr. … Sticht on June 24, 1996.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    On January 24, 1981, Mr. … Sticht on June 24, 1996.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    On January 24, 1981, Mr. … Sticht on June 24, 1996.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    On January 24, 1981, Mr. … Sticht on June 24, 1996.

    United States Tax Court

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.